S
Seed Buyer
- 665
- 63
RG420- are you not going to give the Canna Boost a shot?
RG420- are you not going to give the Canna Boost a shot?
Yep. Even quality buffered coco coir releases alot.of plant usable potassium during a grow. Especially long veg in final pot. Cocotek is decent. But why the high K...is beyond me. Besides higher calcium and bumped up magnesium. ..i think a good coco specific base should have dtpa and eddha chelated iron...much lower K and added fulvic..yucca and aminos. The closest ibe found to really have it all is Nutrifield Coco nutrient. Its even got a little kelp and added silicaThe thing with GH is all their lines are pretty much the same thing. They all have the same ingredients and similar NPKs. I suppose the flora nova series does have added humics though.
----------------------------------------------------------------N ---- P---- K ----Ca -- Mg
Their original flora series 16 ml bloom / 8 ml micro = 130 - 106 - 183 - 130 - 73
Their Flora Nova Series ------- 8 ml bloom -----------=125 - 109 - 182 - 125 - 63
Their CocoTek Series ----------15 ml bloom ----------=136 - 102 - 231 - 180 -70
Their Maxi Bloom Series ------ 8 gm bloom ----------=106 - 138 - 246 - 106 - 74
There is their 3 lines @ recommended dose for bloom and showing the NPK. You can see they are pretty much the same. The higher Ca with cocotek is understandable, but the higher K is not (since coir has 2.5% K by weight). I suppose the P in the maxi series is notably higher than the others.
I know many have run the original flora series and I've run the nova and maxversions quite a bit. I would expect a similar result from the cocotek, since it's mostly the same. Maybe some others have experience that could be shared, as this is all I can help with.
Cocotek at 15 ml of each part would fry tue fuk out of my plants. Well over 2.0 ec. Hell...at one tsp per.gallon of tap its 1.0. Cocotek is a little more concentrated than the other brands out there. Canna is much less and Sensi Grow for coco is even more diluted.The thing with GH is all their lines are pretty much the same thing. They all have the same ingredients and similar NPKs. I suppose the flora nova series does have added humics though.
----------------------------------------------------------------N ---- P---- K ----Ca -- Mg
Their original flora series 16 ml bloom / 8 ml micro = 130 - 106 - 183 - 130 - 73
Their Flora Nova Series ------- 8 ml bloom -----------=125 - 109 - 182 - 125 - 63
Their CocoTek Series ----------15 ml bloom ----------=136 - 102 - 231 - 180 -70
Their Maxi Bloom Series ------ 8 gm bloom ----------=106 - 138 - 246 - 106 - 74
There is their 3 lines @ recommended dose for bloom and showing the NPK. You can see they are pretty much the same. The higher Ca with cocotek is understandable, but the higher K is not (since coir has 2.5% K by weight). I suppose the P in the maxi series is notably higher than the others.
I know many have run the original flora series and I've run the nova and maxi versions quite a bit. I would expect a similar result from the cocotek, since it's mostly the same. Maybe some others have experience that could be shared, as this is all I can help with.