Aqua Man
- 26,480
- 638
Emmiters will only help if you have a deficiency or inadequate gas exchange. I dont think using airstone and adequate surface agitation from airstones would fall into that category.But bacteria do better in warmer environments from my understanding. Obviously there is a point of diminishing returns. I'm really just thinking out loud if these new emmiters will allow you to keep the DO high enough to promote beneficial bacteria and not increase the risk of let's say pythium?
The other study got double the yield from 68 to 74. Ofcourse there must be an increased factor of getting root rot or the like but if you can create an environment that combats that even with higher temps, would that not be worth it?
Yes you can increase temps to a point to speed up growth but you also increase your potential and reproduction rate of most bacteria. Its doable but at a risk. Exactly how much risk I can't tell you. By all means if you have no worries about losing a crop give it a try. Remember each system is different so what works for one may not work for another and so are the variables like ph, genetics, o2, co2, temp, medium, equipment, bb supplements, nutrients. I can't tell you how far you can push it in your system with the genetics your are growing. All I can say is I myself have always tried to minimize the risks of bad bacteria in my aquatic tanks because I have seen the consequences. And in all my peer studies atomizers have more consequences than benefits but that is with living things involved. I really encourage you to look at the aquarium hobby. There is a shot ton more knowledge that pertains to hydroponics than on hydro sites. I mean it's not even comparable especially when it comes to nutrients.