MIMedGrower
- 17,190
- 438
As I’ve stated in the original post this isn’t a referendum on any breeder or strain. Just what we’ve ran that didn’t turn out how we had hoped. We’ve already had a few that have grown one strain and had bad luck and someone else grew it and thought it was awesome.
It’s not about the genetics themselves but what we had in mind as far as expectations and how it actually turned out in our unique growing environments. I can run a strain and have great luck and my neighbor could run it and have bad luck. It’s nothing to do with the genetics but rather the combination of factors that lead us to conclude what we do.
I agree with all this but I am saying if we are disappointed even after growing a pack of something we don’t really know the results on the first try.
Just like you are saying one had good results and another not so good.
I am saying that with any decent genetics the second or later results could be much better and different.
I think in most cases the responsibility of outcome is Grower-Environment-genetics. I realize this is an unpopular opinion among the seed hunters and pollen chuckers.