B
B00P
- 38
- 0
Great thread.
government subsudised raidoactive fertilizer
this is what is giving people cancer it all propagtes the
Monsanto money machine we pay to get sick and then we pay to get medication that they tell us we need to get better its all about money
think of the way to make the most money and you can bet your ass thats how they are doing it .......and anytime that anybody says "they" this company is who is being referd too or "the man" = monsanto:hi
So i'm interrested as i'm sure everyone is on how to get dense buds? Is it a strain dependant thing,a light thing or a fertalizer thing lol?I only have about 2 grows (complete,from seed to chop)under my belt so limited experience as of now but those 2 grows the bud was good but came out after the dry stringy ,light and u can definately see thru and see the stem .How do i corect this i would love to have the beatiful full swollen dense buds that i have grown to love and see on here that makes my mouth water lol Please this winter grow coming up i would love to be all around happy with my efforts.Please can yall experienced growers school me a little :sign0065:
ty yall
Tobacco doesn't give you cancer the shit they add to the cigarettes gives you cancer ie cyanide ,tar etc etcAre you kidding me,who told you the only reason to flush is for color.I have smoked bud both ways and smoking flushed buds is 100% better taste better burns clean
tobacco farmers dont flush but thats the least of your worries when smoking tobacco why flush when there giving you cancer anyway
Some Fully organic mixes as well as some nutrients (SkunkwerksRx) don't require any flushing .... A lot of growers are organic medical growers, slightly different goal then a recreational grower... So I would say take with a grain of salt ... All setups are diff I don't flush when I use SkunkwerksRx and get a perfect end result but when I use fxfm or ghp etc I always do a 14 day flush , but yes flushing does affect the end weight slightly it more affects the left over nutrients in the leaves and stems buds etc but most organic or organic like feeds only let the plant uptake what's needed never anymore i.e.; nutrient burn (not possible w organic or SkunkswerksRx) so Bering no extra nutrition in the bud there's no need to flush .... But the buds should stay rock hard and the amount of weight they lose is almost unmeasurable unless growing thousands of plants.agreed I call bullshit on the #2 as well my bud is rock hard and i always give my plants a 14 day flush
so you say mother nature never flushes ??what might you call a rainstorm??id say at least in my neck of the woods mother nature flushes frequentlySo we've got indica strain, proper feeding, and sufficient light. I have to agree with those. To which I'll add some more. First, on the light component, it must be intense, well reflected, and with as full a spectrum as possible with an emphasis on the red/orange portion. More on proper feeding coming right up.
Next, an article in CC magazine that I found to be very helpful when learning to grow bigger denser buds indoors.
Also, big healthy green leaves are crucial to making big dense buds.
1. Never remove a leaf from the plant, unless the leaf is already about to fall off on it's own due to over-maturity(or accidental/premature death). Pruning shade leaves to increase light reaching lower buds is not a wise choice. You will never make up for the loss of production to the top of the plant from whatever may be gained on the lower part. The answer to that is to provide sufficient lighting to the lower buds, optimal reflectivity is the best way to get more light to the lower parts of the plant. Or just remove them from the plant(why you would is another argument really, so I won't be addressing it here, but I don't recommend it either). Light loses intensity/strength based on distance from the source. So you gain relatively little from doing anything except moving the source closer to the plant, or vise versa. Leaves serve a very important purpose in maintaining plant health and vigor. Buds are not going to efficiently feed themselves without them. LEAVES ARE BUD FEEDERS, NOT BUD FOOD!
2. Never flush. Pre-harvest flushing is such a fat dense bud killer it's not even funny. Just in the hopes of getting a better flavored smoking material. Which you won't. It may actually worsen the flavor, density, smokability, and/or potency of the buds. MINIMALLY you will lose harvested/dried weight. You're essentially starving the plant to death. When you should be feeding it what it needs to grow the BIGGEST DENSEST buds at the point in it's life cycle when that's exactly what it wants to do. Yes, I know the article mentions it, but I don't see that as a recommendation. Just how to incorporate the method, if desired. Which you should desire not, trust me. Much foolishness. Mother Nature, the best grower in the universe, doesn't flush her plants, and nor should you. AND IT WILL ACTUALLY INCREASE INTERNODE LENGTH/STRETCH, GUARANTEED!!!
Lastly, stems. Bigger, denser, heavier buds also need bigger thicker stems to pipe in all the nutritional building blocks used to make them, and to help support their weight. While controlling internode length is very effective at improving density, providing a simulated breeze of adequate strength is THE ONLY non-nutritional way to build a larger-diameter/sturdier stem structure. When the plant grows to resist the forces of wind it will naturally respond to it by thickening it's stems/branches. This benefits the buds come flowering time by allowing them to grow much larger and/or faster. In this sense you can force the plant to grow as if it were older, taller, and/or heavier than it really is. You also will have less need to support the plant by manual methods(stakes, strings, cages, etc.)
I know this is super old but dude......you are so correct if no one is in the forest then the forest is not there!power of thought
just like the old saying .........if you want it bad enough you will get it
Prayer , spells ,self help shit ,etc .it all goes to quantum physics your thoughts are your reality what you precive is your reality
and this one
If a tree falls and no one is their to witness it does it make a sound
well if no one is their......their is no tree or forest
sorry proly confused the issue
very well spoken Ganja :bow:bow:bow
agreed I call bullshit on the #2 as well my bud is rock hard and i always give my plants a 14 day flush
Hasn’t been here since 2015can you message me I just have a couple questions if you don’t mind
There's actually controlled tests that prove there is no positive benefits from flushing on any part of what might be desired in your final product. There are also blind studies out there where all participants preferred the unflushed product over the flushed. Here are the documents...This, especially the second one, contradicts what I've always have been told.
Are these from research or experience?
Why would people flush if it was harmful and unnecessary?
It's not likely that the plant blew up because of the leaving falling off or being removed. The difference is in strain, phenotypes of that strain, and the possibility that the plant had nutrient lock and once it started to heal it was able to push everything it had processed during the lockout to the buds producing a quick swell. If your leaves did not fall off you will have the same results if not a larger yield but strain and phenotype still come into playI dont belive the deleafing part being a no no either....my last crop I had a ph problem while i was away and had my bro takin care....damm near every fan leaf died off (realisticly probly 50-70%).
I yeilded 4lbs of casey of 2 - 1k's.....the bud swelled more then the previous grow....I thought maybe it forced the plants to absorb most of the light through the buds thus exploding the buds.
I'm not saying this is the way to do it, Or thats what happens....its just a completly uneducated geuss.
But when I see people say shit like flushing does nothing and thats a fact, or dont ever pluck any green leafs its hard to know how biased there other facts are. Its all opinions.
There's actually controlled tests that prove there is no positive benefits from flushing on any part of what might be desired in your final product. There are also blind studies out there where all participants preferred the unflushed product over the flushed. Here are the documents...
New Research Shows Flushing Plants Before Harvest May Be Unnecessary
In a blind taste test, researchers have found that many prefer cannabis that has not been flushed before harvest.hightimes.com
I honestly have never flushed in 16 years of growing and my first year i had 375 ladies to take care of as well.
Seems it just comes down to what you're use to then and depending on the type of grow, medium, and nutrient type and amount being used. Not saying you're methods aren't correct but just showing the proof in the pudding with actual control tests that show results. There's actual dozens of these control tests that have been done around the world with the same or similar results. This one is from AU and the other is obviously high times. I read through dozens, just search it up. Proof is always in the pudding and results. Flushing didn't show any improvementI've always used plain water the last week or two for over 20 years of growing. For the last 3 crops I experimented with not flushing at the end because of some of this stuff coming out about it, and just tapered the feed way back the last couple weeks instead. I have to say I'm going back to water only at the end. The difference is noticable for me and everyone who has smoked my pot.
The same reason that folks used to keep their plants nearly dead from dehydration... it supposedly makes the buds stronger. Most of it comes from urban legend... when I started growing, nobody ever mentioned flushing, it was unheard of. Years later, someone decided that their buds were better if you flushed the nutrients out of the soil... supposedly it would cleanse the buds, like a herbal cleanse sweetens somebody's bowels. It started off two or three days and has eveolved to 2 weeks in some circles. It's not really based on anything other than someone's idea of how they think plants react to stuff. Stress doesn't equate with potency, it often causes herming. UV light stress might improve potency, but that is a different topic altogether.This, especially the second one, contradicts what I've always have been told.
Are these from research or experience?
Why would people flush if it was harmful and unnecessary?