Search results for query: *

The real problem could be promoting the idea that stores sell 90% fake, missrepresented or bordering on FRAUDULENT products and this site is run by a store that sells hydroponic merchandise

let's test your weed ....I will pay .. put your weed were your mouth is . do you make money here? why would you possibly want to believe things that are not true?. unless it's financially beneficial for u or you are afraid it may shatter your beliefs and make you rethink a thing or 2 . I WILL...

I did . domt be rude ..do you make money from this site ? the first bastion is criticism and name calling when the science runs out. you obviously believe what you believe over anything else. I 100% DO NOT SEE WHAT YIU ARE REFERRING TOO . COPY AND PASTE THE EXACT PHRASE OR PARAGRAPH I AM...

look that's rude . I am not exactly sure what you are pointing at . 1) I read the study...the only one you provided. It stated it MAY help . 2) the site FRONTIER is listed as NON peer reviewed and MIXED factual references. 3) the "peer" reviewed studies on frontier 4) wiki article ALSO has...

AND I went back and just read the supporting studies....ALL from FRONTIERS which got a MIXED factual rating from media bias as it is OPEN SOURCE publishing OR PAY TO PLAY as it is referred meaning if you pay to publish it , they will publish it .

OK WHO WANTS A FREE LIGHT? I WILL PAY FOR AN EXPERIMENT BETWEEN A 400 OR 600 W HPS AMD A 400 OR 600 LED .( just like I offered for the thc test) I will simply pay to test . I have been doing this a long time. as I said my company TIBBITS AIR put out the first carbon filter for hydroponic in...

Did you ?

you have just one study? that one is not rated credible but I still read it and there is no conclusion that puts it above anything else .just copy and paste the part I am missing

again I will be happy to put my money were my mouth is . who has a 400 watt or 600 watt led ? and lives in Toronto? I WILL GIVE YOU A 600w hps to use NO COST . the same thing I did for the THC level. I will pay for a thc test to show the math . I will also PAY FOR A 600W HPS TO RUN SIDE BY SIDE...

rinse the same on wiki. j see it saying MAY BE . I do not see anything concise that says a higher PAR spectrum will outpace led over hps. remember hps also has par rating. they both have . it's part of light .

or post data

I search and read 3veh day.it is why I post backup data. if 5ou dont like it lost other data and let's look at it ..which is sying it ? what is their motivation? what do data sites say about it .

yes ...so I means as much as wiki . no one is trying to pull a fast one .wiki is right on light. it's not faked or anything. that is normal light data. if you post something back it up .anecdotal stories are the fodder or charlatans. the entire weed bus reinvents science and pretends it's new...

post it . I say 4be opposite. its lime s post it .it is like shrodengurs cat . you don't know till you open the box.

mercury vapour is significantly less efficient in lumens per watt .that is the difference. put the same FOOTCANDLE reading on a plant as a LED and you will get similar growth. the difference will be the wattage taken to supply the FC light intensity required.

i would imagine both articles about weed and light are fairly factual . there is discrepancy in a lot of article but I think the factual rating of the cannabis article is probably as factual as the light article. I also don't see anything seriously wrong with the article you posted but it...

AMD since we are talking proper science FRONTIERS IN PLANT BIOLOGY IS not a properly peer reviewed journal only gi3vn a MIXED FACTUAL RATING by media bias check https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/frontiers/

UH OH THE ENTIRE BUSINESS OF MARIJUANNA has just proved to be fake ! ( because it's on wiki which is not allowed in school .I meant real science) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_(drug)

so they fake the documents to fight light power? lol

and after reading 4he article it says just that ...IT MAY have an increase but that has not be shown conclusively and not by a great amount .