B
bosshog
- 5
- 0
First off, congrats to Dunit for a great journal and awsome results.
I am seriously considering 357's but am trying to confirm distributer claims.
The main claims are:
1. They have a number of growers yeilding 1 gram a watt base on total light wattage not used wattage ie 357 watts = 350 + grams. not base on the 180 watts, the amout of power the lights really use.
2. The lights will cover a 3x3 ft area with the lights 16 inches above the plants growing shorter plant while getting good penetration.
I should say that i am impressed with the light based on Dunits journal. I am simply trying to get as many 357 users to jump in and refute or confirm manufacterer claims.
thanks
BH
I am seriously considering 357's but am trying to confirm distributer claims.
The main claims are:
1. They have a number of growers yeilding 1 gram a watt base on total light wattage not used wattage ie 357 watts = 350 + grams. not base on the 180 watts, the amout of power the lights really use.
2. The lights will cover a 3x3 ft area with the lights 16 inches above the plants growing shorter plant while getting good penetration.
I should say that i am impressed with the light based on Dunits journal. I am simply trying to get as many 357 users to jump in and refute or confirm manufacterer claims.
thanks
BH
