Cpurola's Outdoor grow in Southeast Michigan 2025

  • Thread starter cpurola
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
Thatoneguyyouknow_

Thatoneguyyouknow_

6,225
313
Autoflowering is a recessive trait. If you cross it with a homozygous photo period period plant the resulting offspring will all be photo periods not autos. This has has been observed and recorded a million times over. You don't get any autos until the second generation. You only see first gen autos when the photo plant also carries the recessive auto gene.


in my experience that hasnt been how the autoflower thing works in well over a decade, more like 20 years.. the ruderalis thing jumps ship to a dominant trait through excessive inbreeding just like hermaphrodism can and does. A truly genetically bound herm,ie isnt just a dominant trait, it can actually replace most if bnot all of the males in a species on its own, within a couple gens in a natural population, and thats why 9/10 annuals now a days are all hermaphrodites, evolutionarily designed, in the wild. things like amaranth and cannabis are outliers there. And whether its truly a dominant trait or not is actually irrelevcant to me, because it behaves as one now, and retail market breeders routinely lie about whether their fast photos have reduralis in them or not as well.

Theres a reason im so noisy about the hermaphrodite and reduralis thing these days, they do not behave as recessive traits in many of our lineages anymore, theres been way too much repetitive inbreeding in the genotypes. because of this, it is my opinion that every auto should be treated as if its holding a dominant gebnotype in a first generation cross. CPU's little he she there is a perfect example of what im talking about too. That is exactly what happened on her photoperiod that got pollenated by an auto. that is literally the plant in her photo. If you want to go look at what i was responding to, its the single best example of what im talking about ive ever seen happen, actually. That is a genetically bound hermaphrodite autoflower born from a *stable* photoperiod plant at a single generation. it is quite literally a genetic abomination, and everything i worry about the future of cannabis genetics becoming.

There's only one of only two things that could have happened to make that plant she posted the picture of, both equally troublesome, a breeder lied to her about her photo, or the auto that made pollen had been inbred WAY to excessively without paying attention to the recessive traits at all. Either one can cause a generation of plants like that. They both had the genetically bound recessive hermie trait stacked too, quite obviously lol.

All recessive, That was the case with straight ruderalis genes like 25 years ago and before quite literally half the seedbank photos had ruderalis somewhere in their history.. Hasnt been for over a decade with most of them now and we have entered *very* evolutionarily dangerous waters with the autos, especially considering breeders are lying about long veg autos and calling them fast photos and ruining entire gene pools with their dna


If you hit a photo with the modern stabilized autos you get 1/2 to 3/4 autos and the reulting generation with many (MOST actually) modern photos.

As of today, in my personal experience, it takes a generation or two to remove a stabilized rederalis trait because in most plants it behaves as a dominant trait now. So as far as im concerned it IS a dominant trait. As of right now, with 9/10 stablized autos, if you let them hit a photo, the bulk of your offspring will be autos that start to flower from anywhere from 1 month, to 18 months in.

the longer ones just slowly moreph into non revertable reveg growth itf you keep them around long enough. And they dont even fully revert under 20/4 or 24hrs light



The only safe way forward is to assume ruderalis to be a dominant trait. And thats the only way to easily and quickly educate new growers about a rapidly growing issue in cannabis genetics imho. So thats what i do. As with most things this issue is nuanced and complicated, i simplify it as much as i can tbh. You never have any idea now a days when youre going to have a ruined generation of seed because of how much the genetically bound hermie and ruderalis thing is floating around stacked through inbreeding unless youve been with your lineages from the beginning. And even then, bringing in new DNA can be quite sketchy these days. You truly never know when a generation of genetic hermies or half autos is gonna pop out anymore when working with seedbank genetics from retail market breeders with a bottom line above all else. I generally wont touch seedbank plants to bring into my own lineages unless theres a couple generations of non inbred reg crosses made with known lineages, then ill hunt out and select a male to bring the DNA into my lineages, Its the only way ive found over the last decade or so to make sure i dont have random autos and genetically bound hermies make their way into my lineages from the seedbanks.
 
Last edited:
Grownsince95

Grownsince95

🤘😆👍
Supporter
3,124
263
in my experience that hasnt been how the autoflower thing works in well over a decade, more like 20 years.. the ruderalis thing jumps ship to a dominant trait through excessive inbreeding just like hermaphrodism can and does. A truly genetically bound herm,ie isnt just a dominant trait, it can actually replace most if bnot all of the males in a species on its own, within a couple gens in a natural population, and thats why 9/10 annuals now a days are all hermaphrodites, evolutionarily designed, in the wild. things like amaranth and cannabis are outliers there

Theres a reason im so noisy about the hermaphrodite and reduralis thing these days, they do not behave as recessive traits in many of our lineages anymore, theres been way too much repetitive inbreeding in the genotypes

Nor is that what happened on her photoperiod that got pollenated by an auto that is literally the plant in the photo. If you want to go look at what i was responding to, its the single best example of what im talking about ive ever seen happen, actually. That is a genetically bound hermaphrodite autoflower born from a *stable* photoperiod plant at a single generation. it is quite literally a genetic abomination, and everything i worry about the future of cannabis genetics becoming.

That was the case with straight ruderalis genes like 25 years ago. Hasnt been for over a decade with most of them now and we have entered *very* evolutionarily dangerous waters with the autos, especially considering breeders are lying about long veg autos and calling them fast photos and ruining entire gene pools with their dna


If you hit a photo with the modern stabilized autos you get 1/2 to 3/4 autos and the reulting generation with many (MOST actually) modern photos.



As of today, in my personal experience, it takes a generation or two to remove a stabilized rederalis trait because in most plants it behaves as a dominant trait now. So as far as im concerned it IS a dominant trait. As of right now, with 9/10 stablized autos, if you let them hit a photo, the bulk of your offspring will be autos that start to flower from anywhere from 1 month, to 18 months in.



the longer ones just slowly moreph into non revertable reveg growth itf you keep them around long enough. And they dont even fully revert under 20/4 or 24hrs light
You can imagine your own laws of genetics all you want but it "behaves" dominant to you because any autoflower is homozygous for that trait and carries both recessive genes. Your claim that hitting any photo with an auto will result in first gen autos assumes that most photos plants carry a recessive auto gene and this is just not the case. It's a wild claim and a simple Google search and years of info breeding autos will show you just that.

There's no "dangerous" genetic auto evolution happening. Just a lot of irresponsible breeders and a lot of bad information being passed around as fact.
 
Leste

Leste

181
93
I'm glad too. And yes we did have one of those radios but our county is huge and it was going off all the time so we unplugged it. The news says the weather service is still surveying what and how damage happened, but no houses or people were hurt. Thank goodness.
I was in Missouri once at a party, the tv was on with tornado warnings flashing. I was freaked out, nobody else paid it any mind. I guess if you have warnings all the time you get used to it.
 
Thatoneguyyouknow_

Thatoneguyyouknow_

6,225
313
You can imagine your own laws of genetics all you want but it "behaves" dominant to you because any autoflower is homozygous for that trait and carries both recessive genes. Your claim that hitting any photo with an auto will result in first gen autos assumes that most photos plants carry a recessive auto gene and this is just not the case. It's a wild claim and a simple Google search and years of info breeding autos will show you just that.

There's no "dangerous" genetic auto evolution happening. Just a lot of irresponsible breeders and a lot of bad information being passed around as fact.
im not trying to argue here, or be an ass, but you are literally claiming this plant in the photo is impossible lol..

Heres CPU's genetically bound hermaphrodite autoflower born in a single generation from a photoperiod plant exactly as i had predicted would be the case with the usual modern version of such a cross lol. This is not a one off, or rare occurrence with this kind of cross today either, not at all. its become a "more often then not" then when a modern seedbank sold auto hits a modern seedbank sold photo. The genetics are literally mush lol.

Frostberry 1




With all due respect, im watching this happen all over the place right in front of me across a lot of different gardens on a couple different forums right now. And im doing my best to come up with explanations, because what gets quoted and passed around about ruderalis and the multi-generation thing is the only thing that cant explain this.


ive seen it happen plenty with photos breeders lie ingabout being true photos, and with genetically bound hermaphrodite auto plants hitting photos. Repeatedly, over and over again. This is just how that works. Idc what happens when you cross a wild ruderalis male with a stable photoperiod reg female plant in 1997 lol.

its become a common enough occurrence i dont even work with seedbank DNA anymore because too many breeders lie about their plants.


Idc if a google AI or some old breeder's forum post says this isnt possible, when i stare directly at the result repeatedly with my own eyes. It happens, frequently, stop saying its impossible and start trying to come up with explanations for it. because obviously its possible and its happening, and now a days, for one reason or another, this kind of cross results this way more often then not with seedbank plants. You are going to get very few generations of seed that do what you should be able to expect them to do. I built my own lineages over the years entirely because of the state of modern seedbank cannabis DNA lol.



again not to be dick, im just calling it likes i see's it, and will keep doing that. With genetics theres a limited number of explanations for any given outcome. It is not random, but it is also not set in stone either. If you go about breeding your own plants and making your own seeds, assuming autoflowering is a strictly dominant trait, now a days, your are very likely in for an unfortunate surprise if youre starting from modern seedbank DNA exclusively. However, results become much more predictable now a days if you treat autoflowering as a dominant trait. You get less surprises that way now a days 🤷‍♂️.



Grab a highly inbred fem seed from a seedbank, then force hermie a modern auto and hit that seedbank photo and grow the resulting generation lol. Go for it. You will quite literally be revolted at the results. The result of such a cross is pictured at the top of this post.



Also with all due (and genuine) respect to you, Im not quoting google, im quoting my own hands on, direct, breeding experiences. And i dont personally take a google search as evidence to the contrary when breeders spout disinformation and lie all the time already. And when 99% of the AI results for cannabis are just sourced directly from forum echo chamber posts anyway,.
 
Last edited:
cpurola

cpurola

2,089
263
Update:
Pics of some of the photos. They're outside now and will stay unless frost is predicted, then it's into the greenhouse for the night. Oh, and if a thunderstorm or tornado is predicted.

Beldia Mountain Landrace
Beldia Mountain


Freak
Freak


Iranian Landrace
Iranian


PB2 X Haymeadow
PB2 x Haymeadow


Pbb X Cinderellaman
Pbb x Cinderellaman


Pbb X Okie
Pbb x okie


Psychedelic Banjo
Psychedelic Banjo


Sunshine Daydream
Sunshine Daydream


Turkish Landrace
Turkish
 
EternalSun

EternalSun

564
243
Update:
Pics of some of the photos. They're outside now and will stay unless frost is predicted, then it's into the greenhouse for the night. Oh, and if a thunderstorm or tornado is predicted.

Beldia Mountain Landrace
View attachment 2437120

Freak
View attachment 2437121

Iranian Landrace
View attachment 2437122

PB2 X Haymeadow
View attachment 2437123

Pbb X Cinderellaman
View attachment 2437124

Pbb X Okie
View attachment 2437125

Psychedelic Banjo
View attachment 2437126

Sunshine Daydream
View attachment 2437127

Turkish Landrace
View attachment 2437128
Beautiful! Going to get into the 30’s tonight
 
Galgrows

Galgrows

3,172
263
Good looking starts there 😉 i have to buy more soil for my outdoor pots. I've used a bunch for some container veggies. I'll post my seedling pics in a couple days, they grow slowly with my little germination station lights. I've got 3 decent clones and i'm giving away the 4th clone. I think 6 plants is enough to handle for me LOL. Gawwwd this stiffness i'm feeling from weed wacking doesn't let me work for long.
 
cpurola

cpurola

2,089
263
Well, the survivors so far are:
Humboldt Dream
Afghan
Pineapple OG
Grandaddy Purple
All Gas
Headband
Chunkadelic
Northern Big bud
Alaskan Purple
Northern Lights

Had some of them for years and didn't know if they were viable.
Will be doing some experimenting with them.
Thanks for the inspiration @cbrians 😉
 
Bobcat.Branch

Bobcat.Branch

1,170
263
im not trying to argue here, or be an ass, but you are literally claiming this plant in the photo is impossible lol..

Heres CPU's genetically bound hermaphrodite autoflower born in a single generation from a photoperiod plant exactly as i had predicted would be the case with the usual modern version of such a cross lol. This is not a one off, or rare occurrence with this kind of cross today either, not at all. its become a "more often then not" then when a modern seedbank sold auto hits a modern seedbank sold photo. The genetics are literally mush lol.

View attachment 2434892



With all due respect, im watching this happen all over the place right in front of me across a lot of different gardens on a couple different forums right now. And im doing my best to come up with explanations, because what gets quoted and passed around about ruderalis and the multi-generation thing is the only thing that cant explain this.


ive seen it happen plenty with photos breeders lie ingabout being true photos, and with genetically bound hermaphrodite auto plants hitting photos. Repeatedly, over and over again. This is just how that works. Idc what happens when you cross a wild ruderalis male with a stable photoperiod reg female plant in 1997 lol.

its become a common enough occurrence i dont even work with seedbank DNA anymore because too many breeders lie about their plants.


Idc if a google AI or some old breeder's forum post says this isnt possible, when i stare directly at the result repeatedly with my own eyes. It happens, frequently, stop saying its impossible and start trying to come up with explanations for it. because obviously its possible and its happening, and now a days, for one reason or another, this kind of cross results this way more often then not with seedbank plants. You are going to get very few generations of seed that do what you should be able to expect them to do. I built my own lineages over the years entirely because of the state of modern seedbank cannabis DNA lol.



again not to be dick, im just calling it likes i see's it, and will keep doing that. With genetics theres a limited number of explanations for any given outcome. It is not random, but it is also not set in stone either. If you go about breeding your own plants and making your own seeds, assuming autoflowering is a strictly dominant trait, now a days, your are very likely in for an unfortunate surprise if youre starting from modern seedbank DNA exclusively. However, results become much more predictable now a days if you treat autoflowering as a dominant trait. You get less surprises that way now a days 🤷‍♂️.



Grab a highly inbred fem seed from a seedbank, then force hermie a modern auto and hit that seedbank photo and grow the resulting generation lol. Go for it. You will quite literally be revolted at the results. The result of such a cross is pictured at the top of this post.



Also with all due (and genuine) respect to you, Im not quoting google, im quoting my own hands on, direct, breeding experiences. And i dont personally take a google search as evidence to the contrary when breeders spout disinformation and lie all the time already. And when 99% of the AI results for cannabis are just sourced directly from forum echo chamber posts anyway,.

You both have a healthy dose of correctness in your assertions, but it's not a simple story of Dominant vs. Recessive when pinning down origins or mechanisms, it seems. Fun reading:

Ruderalis Autoflowering evolution
 
cpurola

cpurola

2,089
263
Damn! The weather forcast is soooo shity.
40-60 degrees and spotty rain for the next week, day and night.
Should not have started the plants yet.
And the verticillium in the 12 boxes out back is going to take over. Again.
Thinkin' I won't split the bottoms of the pots open before putting them out back.

Indoor growing is looking better all the time. sigh.
 
Grownsince95

Grownsince95

🤘😆👍
Supporter
3,124
263
Update:
Pics of some of the photos. They're outside now and will stay unless frost is predicted, then it's into the greenhouse for the night. Oh, and if a thunderstorm or tornado is predicted.

Beldia Mountain Landrace
View attachment 2437120

Freak
View attachment 2437121

Iranian Landrace
View attachment 2437122

PB2 X Haymeadow
View attachment 2437123

Pbb X Cinderellaman
View attachment 2437124

Pbb X Okie
View attachment 2437125

Psychedelic Banjo
View attachment 2437126

Sunshine Daydream
View attachment 2437127

Turkish Landrace
View attachment 2437128
I see a lot of bronzing of the new growth across many of your plants. This is an immobie nutrient issue and usually Iron is the culprit. It's most likely from the cold and wet conditions and temporary, but something I would keep an eye on.

Hang tight summer is on the way! 💚
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom