Yes. I guess it really depends on the medium and how it holds nutrient. I grow in soil so I like to pre-load. You're right. Liquid fertilizer is much more available initially than organic matter that needs to go through the entire process of breakdown to the molecular level where the roots can effectively take up the nutrient but liquid fertilizer still needs to catabolize into the smaller molecules that make it available to the plant. Is it faster in uptake? Sure. It doesn't need to break down as much but there is still a process that it needs to go through before it can be absorbed. That's why you see companies like
Advanced Nutrients chelate their products so that the ionic bonds are already in place for the plant to uptake.
Cultivar is also a factor when choosing how to effectively deploy your nutrient scheme. In my case, I'm growing a cultivar that matures within 8 - 10 weeks. This cultivar, GG4, because of its sativa lineage, naturally stretches in the flower process. By loading nitrogen into the flower stage I'm promoting more stretch which is what I'm trying to control. If I had a large grow room with high ceilings then I can see where continuing nitrogen input at that level would make sense but I'm limited in the space I have to work with. As flower approaches I typically up the PPM with a nitrogen rich solution before flip to keep enough nitrogen available to the plant. Along with the natural organic breakdown occurring at the same time I'm feeding there should be more than enough nitrogen in the soil to get the plant through its stretch phase while phosphorous is doing its thing in terms of flower formation. It's really a balancing and timing act where I'm trying to get enough nitrogen to the plant without promoting the characteristics that I want to control.
Essentially what I'm doing is lengthening the window where flower production is happening rather than more leaf and branch formation. High nitrogen in the soil when flip is in progress is going to slow that process down.
Of course, I could be totally wrong on ALL this and just burping out Broscience so if you have any links with empirical data that says otherwise I would love to review it.