chazbolin
- 162
- 43
Nice pics Hippy! You noted that the iGrow lamp is 6" longer than the IG. What your images tend to illustrate is that the longer lamp is not putting out the intensity of the shorter IG lamp. The other thing to consider is that the iGrow is using a painted reflector with very low reflectivity. The hood is larger which would imply greater surface reflectivity over a larger area but that is not the case since light doesn't bend. Keep in mind that 50% of the lamps surface is facing backwards into the reflector and as the lamps run parallel the light being emitted between the glass tubes needs to be directed towards the canopy. This is not being done with the iGrow and energy is being lost. The IG reflectors look like a mirror and you don't see the lamps reflection in any of these images. That is important. It means the lamps energy is making it to the canopy. If you were take the IG light down and stand in front of it, or lay under it and look up, only than would you see the lamps reflection. This is as a plant would see that energy at the canopy.
While the plants don't care what you paid for a light, your wallet/yield ratio will. iGrow charges $1,200 for that fixture and IG charges $795 for theirs. Let's see who out yields the other and you'll be able to determine which was the better value and perhaps more importantly, establish it for those who have yet to take the financial leap which you have done.
While the plants don't care what you paid for a light, your wallet/yield ratio will. iGrow charges $1,200 for that fixture and IG charges $795 for theirs. Let's see who out yields the other and you'll be able to determine which was the better value and perhaps more importantly, establish it for those who have yet to take the financial leap which you have done.