plumsmooth
- 295
- 63
By the way if someone believes there is another measurement parameter that I might be missing i.e. PAR micro moles not good enough for my conclusion please let me know!
When I bought this light I was worried it was overkill for a non co2 environment.
I run constant Ventilation to distribute the heat in my 2 bedroom home where one of the upstairs bedrooms houses my plants.
Realizing that my Foot Candle handheld Digital cheap Light Meter was not going to be sufficient to properly differentiate between useable light I figured I would just run it no closer than initially about 24 inches to avoid over saturation and subsequent bleaching etc...
Finally I downloaded the Photome application for my iphone and installed a diffuser as per the instructions.
I then selected the appropriate light source on the app and proceeded to compare the PPFD ūmol/m2s between my 315 CMH at a distance of about 12 inches -- which is about the maximum distance close I allow them to reach -- because of heat and spread.
Conclusion: The PAR output of one of the 6 Banks of led's on the board of the Scorpion Diablo directly underneath puts out almost IDENTICAL Par Reading.
That means I had the Scorpion Diablo at twice the distance necessary and what a waste of light. My plants have no problem -- with the exception of strain heat tolerance variability -- being right up no more than 12 Inches (I try to see it at 16) to my 315 CMH.
Therefore my plants should have no problem being the same distance from the Scorpion Diablo "without" CO2!
Intriguingly the difference here -- despite maybe some beam angle off to the side measurements -- is that the Scorpion Diablo is creating 6 areas of intense light directly under a similar foot print to the CMH's. In a way that strikes me as 6X the potential light with a different of less than 2x power consumption!
That said I noticed in-between the led 6 sections of the SD quite a drop off, but then again I also get a similar maybe less pronounced drop off off to the side of the CMH's
All in all being that I am currently running my first ever "only LED" flowering cycle on one of my Big Plants I will be interested to see the quality comparison.
CMH's provide a spectrum that produces very nice flowers and foliage.
I am not 100% convinced that LED's ultimately can match this yet?
I would love to hear form anyone that has managed to read this far into my Post.
Thanks for listening. I hope this helps someone as the info after reaching was insufficient to answer this question without direct measurement! A picture will follow...
When I bought this light I was worried it was overkill for a non co2 environment.
I run constant Ventilation to distribute the heat in my 2 bedroom home where one of the upstairs bedrooms houses my plants.
Realizing that my Foot Candle handheld Digital cheap Light Meter was not going to be sufficient to properly differentiate between useable light I figured I would just run it no closer than initially about 24 inches to avoid over saturation and subsequent bleaching etc...
Finally I downloaded the Photome application for my iphone and installed a diffuser as per the instructions.
I then selected the appropriate light source on the app and proceeded to compare the PPFD ūmol/m2s between my 315 CMH at a distance of about 12 inches -- which is about the maximum distance close I allow them to reach -- because of heat and spread.
Conclusion: The PAR output of one of the 6 Banks of led's on the board of the Scorpion Diablo directly underneath puts out almost IDENTICAL Par Reading.
That means I had the Scorpion Diablo at twice the distance necessary and what a waste of light. My plants have no problem -- with the exception of strain heat tolerance variability -- being right up no more than 12 Inches (I try to see it at 16) to my 315 CMH.
Therefore my plants should have no problem being the same distance from the Scorpion Diablo "without" CO2!
Intriguingly the difference here -- despite maybe some beam angle off to the side measurements -- is that the Scorpion Diablo is creating 6 areas of intense light directly under a similar foot print to the CMH's. In a way that strikes me as 6X the potential light with a different of less than 2x power consumption!
That said I noticed in-between the led 6 sections of the SD quite a drop off, but then again I also get a similar maybe less pronounced drop off off to the side of the CMH's
All in all being that I am currently running my first ever "only LED" flowering cycle on one of my Big Plants I will be interested to see the quality comparison.
CMH's provide a spectrum that produces very nice flowers and foliage.
I am not 100% convinced that LED's ultimately can match this yet?
I would love to hear form anyone that has managed to read this far into my Post.
Thanks for listening. I hope this helps someone as the info after reaching was insufficient to answer this question without direct measurement! A picture will follow...
Last edited: