Kansas couple: Indoor gardening prompted pot raid

  • Thread starter squarepusher
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
squarepusher

squarepusher

959
43
Kansas couple: Indoor gardening prompted pot raid

By HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH | Associated Press – 2 hrs 59 mins ago
  • 71f5c980be50910a2d0f6a7067005100.jpg

    View Photo
    Associated Press/Orlin Wagner - Bob Harte stands next to his now shut down indoor garden in the basement of his home in Leawood, Kan., Friday, March 29, 2013. Harte and his wife Adlynn, who are former CIA employees, …more
Related Content

  • 71927f78be51910a2d0f6a70670078a0.jpg

    Addie and Bob Harte share photos …
  • 11f8b3bfbe52910a2d0f6a7067001074.jpg

    Bob Harte demonstrates where police …
LEAWOOD, Kan. (AP) — Two former CIA employees whose Kansas home was fruitlessly searched for marijuana during a two-state drug sweep claim they were illegally targeted, possibly because they had bought indoor growing supplies to raise vegetables.
Adlynn and Robert Harte sued this week to get more information about why sheriff's deputies searched their home in the upscale Kansas City suburb of Leawood last April 20 as part of Operation Constant Gardener — a sweep conducted by agencies in Kansas and Missouri that netted marijuana plants, processed marijuana, guns, growing paraphernalia and cash from several other locations.
April 20 long has been used by marijuana enthusiasts to celebrate the illegal drug and more recently by law enforcement for raids and crackdowns. But the Hartes' attorney, Cheryl Pilate, said she suspects the couple's 1,825-square-foot split level was targeted because they had bought hydroponic equipment to grow a small number of tomatoes and squash plants in their basement.
"With little or no other evidence of any illegal activity, law enforcement officers make the assumption that shoppers at the store are potential marijuana growers, even though the stores are most commonly frequented by backyard gardeners who grow organically or start seedlings indoors," the couple's lawsuit says.
The couple filed the suit this week under the Kansas Open Records Act after Johnson County and Leawood denied their initial records requests, with Leawood saying it had no relevant records. The Hartes say the public has an interest in knowing whether the sheriff's department's participation in the raids was "based on a well-founded belief of marijuana use and cultivation at the targeted addresses, or whether the raids primarily served a publicity purpose."
"If this can happen to us and we are educated and have reasonable resources, how does somebody who maybe hasn't led a perfect life supposed to be free in this country?" Adlynn Harte said in an interview Friday.
The suit filed in Johnson County District Court said the couple and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 13-year-old son — were "shocked and frightened" when deputies armed with assault rifles and wearing bulletproof vests pounded on the door of their home around 7:30 a.m. last April 20.
"It was just like on the cops TV shows," Robert Harte told The Associated Press. "It was like 'Zero Dark Thirty' ready to storm the compound."
During the sweep, the court filing said, the Hartes were told they had been under surveillance for months, but the couple "know of no basis for conducting such surveillance nor do they believe such surveillance would have produced any facts supporting the issuance of a search warrant."
Harte said he built the hydroponic garden with his son a couple of years ago. He said they didn't use the powerful light bulbs that are sometimes used to grow marijuana and that the family's electricity usage didn't change dramatically. Changes in utility usage can sometimes lead authorities to such operations.
When law enforcement arrived, the family had just six plants — three tomato plants, one melon plant and two butternut squash plants — growing in the basement, Harte said.
The suit also said deputies "made rude comments" and implied their son was using marijuana. A drug-sniffing dog was brought in to help, but deputies ultimately left after providing a receipt stating, "No items taken."
Pilate said no one in the Harte family uses illegal drugs and no charges were filed. The lawsuit noted Adlynn Harte, who works for a financial planning firm, and Robert Harte, who cares for the couple's children, each were required to pass rigorous background checks for their previous jobs working for the CIA in Washington, D.C. Pilate said she couldn't provide any other details about their CIA employment.
Pilate said any details gleaned from the open records suit could be used in a future federal civil rights lawsuit.
"You can't go into people's homes and conduct searches without probable cause," Pilate said.
Leawood City Administrator Scott Lambers said Friday that he couldn't comment on pending litigation. The sheriff's office also had no comment.
"Obviously with an ongoing lawsuit we are not able to talk about any details of it until it's been played out in court," said Johnson County Deputy Tom Erickson.
 
SuperCan

SuperCan

63
18
LEAWOOD, Kan. (AP) — Two former CIA employees whose Kansas home was fruitlessly searched for marijuana during a two-state drug sweep claim they were illegally targeted, possibly because they had bought indoor growing supplies to raise vegetables.

Adlynn and Robert Harte sued this week to get more information about why sheriff's deputies searched their home in the upscale Kansas City suburb of Leawood last April 20 as part of Operation Constant Gardener — a sweep conducted by agencies in Kansas and Missouri that netted marijuana plants, processed marijuana, guns, growing paraphernalia and cash from several other locations.
April 20 long has been used by marijuana enthusiasts to celebrate the illegal drug and more recently by law enforcement for raids and crackdowns. But the Hartes' attorney, Cheryl Pilate, said she suspects the couple's 1,825-square-foot split level was targeted because they had bought hydroponic equipment to grow a small number of tomatoes and squash plants in their basement.

"With little or no other evidence of any illegal activity, law enforcement officers make the assumption that shoppers at the store are potential marijuana growers, even though the stores are most commonly frequented by backyard gardeners who grow organically or start seedlings indoors," the couple's lawsuit says.

The couple filed the suit this week under the Kansas Open Records Act after Johnson County and Leawood denied their initial records requests, with Leawood saying it had no relevant records. The Hartes say the public has an interest in knowing whether the sheriff's department's participation in the raids was "based on a well-founded belief of marijuana use and cultivation at the targeted addresses, or whether the raids primarily served a publicity purpose."
"If this can happen to us and we are educated and have reasonable resources, how does somebody who maybe hasn't led a perfect life supposed to be free in this country?" Adlynn Harte said in an interview Friday.

The suit filed in Johnson County District Court said the couple and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 13-year-old son — were "shocked and frightened" when deputies armed with assault rifles and wearing bulletproof vests pounded on the door of their home around 7:30 a.m. last April 20.

"It was just like on the cops TV shows," Robert Harte told The Associated Press. "It was like 'Zero Dark Thirty' ready to storm the compound."
During the sweep, the court filing said, the Hartes were told they had been under surveillance for months, but the couple "know of no basis for conducting such surveillance nor do they believe such surveillance would have produced any facts supporting the issuance of a search warrant."
Harte said he built the hydroponic garden with his son a couple of years ago. He said they didn't use the powerful light bulbs that are sometimes used to grow marijuana and that the family's electricity usage didn't change dramatically. Changes in utility usage can sometimes lead authorities to such operations.

When law enforcement arrived, the family had just six plants — three tomato plants, one melon plant and two butternut squash plants — growing in the basement, Harte said.
The suit also said deputies "made rude comments" and implied their son was using marijuana. A drug-sniffing dog was brought in to help, but deputies ultimately left after providing a receipt stating, "No items taken."

Pilate said no one in the Harte family uses illegal drugs and no charges were filed. The lawsuit noted Adlynn Harte, who works for a financial planning firm, and Robert Harte, who cares for the couple's children, each were required to pass rigorous background checks for their previous jobs working for the CIA in Washington, D.C. Pilate said she couldn't provide any other details about their CIA employment.

Pilate said any details gleaned from the open records suit could be used in a future federal civil rights lawsuit.

"You can't go into people's homes and conduct searches without probable cause," Pilate said.
Leawood City Administrator Scott Lambers said Friday that he couldn't comment on pending litigation. The sheriff's office also had no comment.

"Obviously with an ongoing lawsuit we are not able to talk about any details of it until it's been played out in court," said Johnson County Deputy Tom Erickson.



http://bigstory.ap.org/article/kansas-couple-indoor-gardening-prompted-pot-raid
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

6,892
313
Apparently it now takes former CIA employees to hold accountable? I think I know one small town sheriff who is about to get sued for blatant civil rights violations!

Remember, they are at their most desperate when they know they're losing the war.
 
Seamaiden

Seamaiden

Living dead girl
23,596
638
The more of their own are inadvertently caught up, the less they'll like this war they wage. ;)
 
SuperCan

SuperCan

63
18
So it now takes former CIA employees to hold of law enforcement accountable? Whatever it takes, I hope that jerkoff small town sheriff gets his ass handed to him.
I could not have said it better myself the thing I enjoyed most about it was that it was not one but two former CIA agents. What does it take to earn a little immunity from frivolous prosecution apparently dedicating your life and career to defending your country isn't enough.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

6,892
313
I want to see how this unfolds; Unfortunately, my bet is the sheriff will keep his job, in spite of a civil rights lawsuit costing the city millions.

Those agents are going to set an example heard 'round the country- not exactly the low profile life they were used to!
 
vaporedout

vaporedout

1,362
163
yeah hell probably keep his job and theyll play it off like "better safe than sorry".... i hope they go for the jugular.
 
SuperCan

SuperCan

63
18
yeah hell probably keep his job and theyll play it off like "better safe than sorry".... i hope they go for the jugular.
I am sure that they will. I do not have children but I know that if someone accused my sister's child of smoking marijuana while breaking and entering into her home she would go for the throat.
 
DemonPigeon

DemonPigeon

32
18
I'd feel more sympathetic if they weren't CIA affiliated...
 
B

Burned Haze

Guest
Sue them for all they got and now grow cannabis since The cops will fear to now lol
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

6,892
313
yeah I didn't catch that when I read the article. So ya know what? FUCK EM BOTH!

They both were CIA pigs.

No. This is wrongheaded, shortsighted and dangerous. Like it or not, the people who work in our government are citizens too, and thus deserving of all the protections we fight for.

Beware of lumping 'them' all together, lest they return the favor. We need to insist that our government serve us better, and reward those parts that do. Create incentive to root out the parts that don't and fix them.

Most of all, we must drive a wedge between corporate power and government influence. Without that, we will dance in the streets like the Occupy Wall Street group, but ultimately change nothing.
 
DemonPigeon

DemonPigeon

32
18
No. This is wrongheaded, shortsighted and dangerous. Like it or not, the people who work in our government are citizens too, and thus deserving of all the protections we fight for.

Beware of lumping 'them' all together, lest they return the favor. We need to insist that our government serve us better, and reward those parts that do. Create incentive to root out the parts that don't and fix them.

Most of all, we must drive a wedge between corporate power and government influence. Without that, we will dance in the streets like the Occupy Wall Street group, but ultimately change nothing.

I am pretty conflicted, I suppose it depends what thier role in the CIA was, former DEA officials and Narcotics officers I feel deeply suspicious of, because while government service and the police and both hugely important to protect and serve the people certain parts of it persecute medical patients, and they didn't have to become Narcs or DEA agents, that was thier choice to transfer to that department...

And over the years the CIA have been involved in many questionable things, such as extrodinary rendition and waterboarding.

I'm sure some are descent and lovely people but there's a lot of wankers too
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

6,892
313
I am pretty conflicted, I suppose it depends what thier role in the CIA was, former DEA officials and Narcotics officers I feel deeply suspicious of, because while government service and the police and both hugely important to protect and serve the people certain parts of it persecute medical patients, and they didn't have to become Narcs or DEA agents, that was thier choice to transfer to that department...

And over the years the CIA have been involved in many questionable things, such as extrodinary rendition and waterboarding.

I'm sure some are descent and lovely people but there's a lot of wankers too

I hear you. Hence, the incentive to root the bad out of our government- in fact, the paradigm to follow IS that 'it's OUR government, stop using it to harass US!"
 
Top Bottom