J
JamesVJ
- Posts
- 168
- Reactions
- 214
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2024
- Points
- 43
Here is the cover letter.
121,256 growers, practical cultivation threads, real grow diaries, and community advice.
Create account → Already a member? Log inFollow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s a study of the aviation industry in hopes of reducing their contrails - which have an effect on climate change. Not that there’s government spraying.I was sent info on X of Government Funded spraying.
I don't know why they would do this. But....
They are admitting to doing it. They've renamed clouds. I BELIVE what I see with my eyes.They are spraying us.It’s a study of the aviation industry in hopes of reducing their contrails - which have an effect on climate change. Not that there’s government spraying.
View attachment 2394332
Who is “they”? Clearly NASA, NOAA, & the FAA understand the science behind contrails. As would you if you read the Ascent site you posted. It actually contains a link to the Contrails Research Roadmap report that most certainly doesn’t say what you’re suggesting.They are admitting to doing it. They've renamed clouds. I BELIVE what I see with my eyes.They are spraying us.
Yes. They want more $ to study what they are in fact doing.Who is “they”? Clearly NASA, NOAA, & the FAA understand the science behind contrails. As would you if you read the Ascent site you posted. It actually contains a link to the Contrails Research Roadmap report that most certainly doesn’t say what you’re suggesting.
Contrails contribute to global warming. The IPCC report notes that contrails are responsible for about 35% of aviation's global warming impact. So it’s certainly understandable that scientists and the aviation industry would study ways to reduce this impact and why they’re issuing the report.
Contrails are indisputably clouds that form behind jet aircraft. To make a fantastical leap that NASA & NOAA are spraying chemicals for some nefarious secret large-scale atmospheric program is frankly, ridiculous.Yes. They want more $ to study what they are in fact doing.
I'm not basing my belief in just the info I found on X.Contrails are indisputably clouds that form behind jet aircraft. To make a fantastical leap that NASA & NOAA are spraying chemicals for some nefarious secret large-scale atmospheric program is frankly, ridiculous.
Why not just search on “Chemtrails” and then read the first 10 links - all which debunk the notion? Isn’t it easier to read reputable information, instead of searching out conspiracy post on x?
I don't think its intelligent to believe peer reviewed articles either. If you are not doing the tests yourself, then all you have is belief. Beliefs are not truth.I’m going with mancorn on this one. X and YouTube videos are not science. Posted peer reviewed papers are. Opinions are not facts
I agree. If you arent doing any scientific tests, all your conclusions which are beliefs, are garbled. That's just the age we live in. A fact is that there is plenty of peer reviewed science that is complete garbage. We simply dont know, any of us. To argue one I dont know against another I dont know is just an ego trying to feel superior.I’m not a scientist nor do I play one on tv.doing tests yourself on something you know nothing about only leads to garbled conclusions. Again, YouTube videos and X posts aren’t the answer.
In that case, every one of us will need to reinvent the wheel so we can know for certain it rolls. Until then, it's only a belief.I don't think its intelligent to believe peer reviewed articles either. If you are not doing the tests yourself, then all you have is belief. Beliefs are not truth.
Make sure you pre charge it so to speak or it will pull nutes out of the soil. It's basically a microbe hotelI made 500# or so of biochar yesterday. I had 3 pits running. It was smoky but it was kinda fun.
My animals all stood and watched me. It took several hours and it was worth it.
I charged the goods with super nasty fermented chicken goat cow donkey poo and tons of grass leaves etc. The mix has been fermenting since Sept.
I added 5 gallons to 500# of charcoal and pond water to slop it up. I'm going to pulverize the coal today and Chuck it in the garden.
The info I watched said this will really help with microbial growth. I'm hoping it helps.
If the Indians used this method I think this will work. Meaning I will bring in beneficial microbes etc.View attachment 2393842View attachment 2393842View attachment 2393833View attachment 2393834View attachment 2393835View attachment 2393836View attachment 2393837View attachment 2393838View attachment 2393839View attachment 2393840View attachment 2393841View attachment 2393834View attachment 2393833View attachment 2393834View attachment 2393835View attachment 2393836View attachment 2393837View attachment 2393838View attachment 2393840View attachment 2393840View attachment 2393841View attachment 2393835
Yes!Make sure you pre charge it so to speak or it will pull nutes out of the soil. It's basically a microbe hotel![]()
The purpose of peer review is to report results and allow other researchers to attempt to replicate findings. Replication of results is important. A research study could be "complete garbage" but why would any researcher want to embarrass their self in front of their peers by presenting garbage? Doing so could end their career. Results of a study can be incorrect or misleading, but verification is the reason for peer review. Peers are people who study the same subject and thus understand what they're seeing when they look at the research and the findings.A fact is that there is plenty of peer reviewed science that is complete garbage.
We can if we know how to think and reason critically.We simply don't know, any of us.
Moneybut why would any researcher want to embarrass their self in front of their peers by presenting garbag