Egzoset
- Posts
- 175
- Reactions
- 98
- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Points
- 28
Salutations,
While plenty of individuals hailed the recent Oval Office announcement as some "never seen before" progressive decree, others feel deeply critical about it and i'm among them. Make no mistake, staging a hollywoodian circus around lab coats opened no doors; at best this was much more like organizing a transfer from one cage to another that's still lined with dehumanizing bars.
As company we find nannies dancing at the rythm of puritan capitalism, which to me is just déjà‑vu reminiscent of Moscow's FCTC/COP6 (WHO) 2014 event where Nora Volkow's specter already seemed to be shaping the future of health-wise consumption methods (namely vaporizers, electronic cigarettes and water pipes). M'well from a distance because i doubt she was there at all, but somehow i get an impression that's one plausible link explaining her glowing smile confidently displayed as she stood only a few feet away from Donald Trump.
Trump signs executive order reclassifying cannabis | NBC News @ 14:43 ~ 15:48
[ https:// i.postimg.cc/267V9YxY/Trump-signs-executive-order-to-reclassify-cannabis-(2025-Dec-18)-640x600.png ]
All i can tell with certainty is that NIDA's director visit of 2016 at hotel Marriott of Montréal contributed a great deal to the CSAM/SMCA 1st symposium on addiction as guest, and hence the destruction of Québec's chances for true legalization. So, sorry kids but your adolescent brains will continue serving as her preferred battlefield pushing against recreational use reforms; in other words $pe¢iali$ts/expert$ won't stop talking about your broken brains and pathological addiction anytime soon, while remaining blind to the really severe co-morbidity of alcohol... Meanwhile such self-serving political lever also garantees plain job security, FYI Volkow herself been thriving on anti-cannabis bigotry since at least 2003.
What Schedule III does for cannabis consumers is to remove a 280E tax burden from the shoulders of those making a dime on it, who can now contemplate future niche opportunities. It's safe to bet that's all the headlines will care about as well, besides H.R. 5371 of November 2025 finally putting a stop to psychoactive hemp markets — a breach opened by Trump's Farm Bill of 2018, finally extended to cover isomers as part of his new regulatory framework.
Never mind honesty and respect, self‑esteem is bound to stay under a thick $i¢k ’n $ad shadow, by design! Quite like in my $a¢ifi¢ed canuck province except USA is back to 2001 compared to Canada.
While plenty of individuals hailed the recent Oval Office announcement as some "never seen before" progressive decree, others feel deeply critical about it and i'm among them. Make no mistake, staging a hollywoodian circus around lab coats opened no doors; at best this was much more like organizing a transfer from one cage to another that's still lined with dehumanizing bars.
As company we find nannies dancing at the rythm of puritan capitalism, which to me is just déjà‑vu reminiscent of Moscow's FCTC/COP6 (WHO) 2014 event where Nora Volkow's specter already seemed to be shaping the future of health-wise consumption methods (namely vaporizers, electronic cigarettes and water pipes). M'well from a distance because i doubt she was there at all, but somehow i get an impression that's one plausible link explaining her glowing smile confidently displayed as she stood only a few feet away from Donald Trump.
Trump signs executive order reclassifying cannabis | NBC News @ 14:43 ~ 15:48
[ https:// i.postimg.cc/267V9YxY/Trump-signs-executive-order-to-reclassify-cannabis-(2025-Dec-18)-640x600.png ]
« Uh I'm Nora Volkow. I'm director National Institute on Drug Abuse. And for us, the rescheduling opens the door to actually be able to accelerate the rate at which we can do research and discovery. And research is crucial in order for us to for example understand what may be and for whom the dangers of cannabis.
Yes, cannabis can be addictive. And certainly people adolescence and children may be the most vulnerable. But we cannot close our eyes to research and the opportunity that we are hearing from patients that for some of them cannabis can solve their problem. And so what we need to do is do research number one to understand what are those conditions. Number two, in order to be able to optimally learn how to use it and to understand number three, who is a danger and it is knowledge that will allow us to optimally benefit take the benefits that may be behind cannabis as research shows, but on the other hand also enable us better to do prevention interventions to protect those that are most vulnerable. »
All i can tell with certainty is that NIDA's director visit of 2016 at hotel Marriott of Montréal contributed a great deal to the CSAM/SMCA 1st symposium on addiction as guest, and hence the destruction of Québec's chances for true legalization. So, sorry kids but your adolescent brains will continue serving as her preferred battlefield pushing against recreational use reforms; in other words $pe¢iali$ts/expert$ won't stop talking about your broken brains and pathological addiction anytime soon, while remaining blind to the really severe co-morbidity of alcohol... Meanwhile such self-serving political lever also garantees plain job security, FYI Volkow herself been thriving on anti-cannabis bigotry since at least 2003.
What Schedule III does for cannabis consumers is to remove a 280E tax burden from the shoulders of those making a dime on it, who can now contemplate future niche opportunities. It's safe to bet that's all the headlines will care about as well, besides H.R. 5371 of November 2025 finally putting a stop to psychoactive hemp markets — a breach opened by Trump's Farm Bill of 2018, finally extended to cover isomers as part of his new regulatory framework.
Never mind honesty and respect, self‑esteem is bound to stay under a thick $i¢k ’n $ad shadow, by design! Quite like in my $a¢ifi¢ed canuck province except USA is back to 2001 compared to Canada.
Last edited:
