Sshfan
- 61
- 6
sshfan said:No offense but he sounds like I did when I was 20 something. Thought I knew everything and had very little sympathy for others. Thought I could never fuck up... Have a little sympathy for this guy what he was doing is harmless. Marijuana has never killed anyone. He does not deserve 60 years in prison for being stupid or breaking the "rules" of a corrupt and outdated system.
I'm curious if anyone who has attempted to bring up a medical defense in federal court, has brought up the fact that the federal government has it's own MMJ patients. Doesn't seem like the prosecutor could propose a valid argument against, if the same entity that pays him also in fact is guilty of the same accusations. Of course I can't remember the last time I witnessed the feds do something that was truly just and righteous.
I'm curious if anyone who has attempted to bring up a medical defense in federal court, has brought up the fact that the federal government has it's own MMJ patients. Doesn't seem like the prosecutor could propose a valid argument against, if the same entity that pays him also in fact is guilty of the same accusations. Of course I can't remember the last time I witnessed the feds do something that was truly just and righteous.
If it were actually a medical grow for actual med patients then I'd be all over that crap - but really - but if it were an actual medical grow under state law, the DEA would've found it too politically sensitive to bother with.
sshfan said:Sorry, I can't work within those limited constraints. People have been supplying me good herb for 20 years outside the medical system and they don't deserve jail either.
dizzle said:guys a real dumb fuck, a true ego maniac, but I have a feeling he will get a plea and serve 3-10yrs. my heart wont allow me to believe a prosecutor would want to jail someone for 60yrs for growing herb
dizzle said:wow, I just watched the video of this fucktard on the news. Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck him, he can do the whole bid for all I care, what a mutt.
There's something else most jurors aren't told about, and that's jury nullification.This is where the law is flakey and it is hard to have respect for law that is not fair and lets the defendant tell his side of the story. I always heard you should hear both sides of the story before making a "fair" decision. The fed have a history of cases like this in California of not allowing the defendant to bring up state medical laws. In other words, they don't allow the full side of the story to even be mentioned.
The judge will tell the jury the law is not up for interpretation so will the prosecutor. Its the "rules". This is where citizens need to make a stand and vote not guilty if the law is not fair and take this system back to what it was intended to be.
He could be the biggest idiot in the world, doesn't mean he should go to jail for any length of time. I don't remember any of his victims complaining (oh right, he didn't have any), no animals, wildlife or public property was harmed, so I'm not sure why anyone is considering putting him in jail....
strange how this simple truth keeps gettin passed by. right on Dorje
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?