UgrewWHAT
- Posts
- 366
- Reactions
- 727
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2015
- Points
- 93
Outdoor only, organic only.Was this mainly for outdoor grown?
Blaze, thank you! I just saw that the San Francisco Gate posted that Cherry Limeaide won but didn't disclose second or third place. Were you there too?1st place #373 Cherry Limeade
2nd place #371 Lemonhead OG
3rd place #13 Purple Candycane
You can view all the entries here:
http://contests.theemeraldcup.com/entries/2015/flower
They still have not released the list for the top 20 yet apparently.
I was about to say the same thing about the judges/ judging. That, Aficionado seems to be on a streak is one thing but you're absolutely correct. The same judges and their personal taste will very likely pre-empt the same results every time.It is supposed to be anonymous. The jars are given a serial number which matches the entry sheet submitted. So when the judges are smoking the entries they do not know what the strain is or who entered it, they just know it by its number. There were 12 judges this year, not sure how they were selected. It has been the same judges the last few years, and there was definitely grumblings this year that new people should be brought in, as the same few people with the same few strains keep winning the top couple spots every year. Not sure if it is really 'rigged' per say, but if you have the people judging every time, with the same personal preferences, the same strains will likely be the favorites every time.
The manner in which they are smoked is up to the individual judge. Samples are evaluated over several weeks (which is good, impossible to judge potency on 100+ strains in a day). Many samples are weeded out pretty quickly if they have for example a bad smell, etc. Over 100 entries were disqualified due to testing positive for pesticides and/or mold.
The cup was only for organic sun grown cannabis, no indoor was allowed.
Over 100 entries were disqualified due to testing positive for pesticides and/or mold.
We can't rule that out at all.That's fucking scary. I imagine if these douchebags are entering contests with this weed they are also selling it.
outwest
Blaze, thank you! I just saw that the San Francisco Gate posted that Cherry Limeaide won but didn't disclose second or third place. Were you there too?
That's fucking scary. I imagine if these douchebags are entering contests with this weed they are also selling it.
outwest
I agree with this 100%,what grows well at my old spot near san diego does not do so well in my new spot,4000 ft in elevation higher and a different micro climate completely.I do beleive you can acclimate an old strain to a new area but it takes awhile.I'll go out on a limb here to clarify what Blaze said with my own two cents put in:
Having personally tasted cannabis grown in San Diego, Los Angeles, the Central Coast, the Central Valley, Big Sur, the Bay Area, Mendocino, Redding and Shasta Trinity, Arcata... I can say that each of these have their own unique micro-climate, soil and surrounding vegetation.
No two are alike and therefore if one were to grow the same cut in each of the aforementioned locations no two will turn out identical. I've done this. I've grown the same IBL in San Diego, then later in LA and when living on the central coast grew it there. My central coast grow blew the other two out of the water.
If our judges are Mendocino native then chances are they will favor something flavoresque to their climate. This may be why Aficionado and their neighbors find themselves in the winners circle.
Any ideas?
I was, my Watermelon Rancher placed in the top 20. Not too bad for my first contest.
According to the rep I talked to at SC labs they have seen Eagle 20 show up even after 3 generations of clones.
Also I believe many of the judges were from out of area as well. Like I said, I don't think it was rigged, but new people, with different tastes would probably help mix up the results in the future.
I second that!Congrats on growing some top 20 Cali Outdoor. Win or not, that is an accomplishment worth recognizing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?