MIMedGrower
- 17,190
- 438
Well said. T
Well said.
Thanks. This is my first thread and am understanding the impact of misinformation. That is why i made sure to state that i had no data to back up whether a technique did or did not work. In the future, ill leave out and only share real results based on side by side or controlled experiments.
I do know that i have very likely experienced an increase in yield with the same amount of light and co2 but letting the rh stay within charts. My system is more efficient as a bonus cuz my dehuey doesnt run all day.
Gotta wait for drying to post g/w. Looking forward to reporting on quality as well.
Appreciate all the advice guys...
Thanks for saying alot in a few words. I never gave thought to the consistency/gradual transition of my grow vs. nominal values of temp and rh. Its hard to stay objective.
Well thanks for effin that up. Was i more successfull cuz of the humidity, or because i learned from previous mistakes and then applied what was learned? That dried papaya got me thinkin!
I totally know what u meant. Thats what sucks about this venue. Tone is not conveyed.Wait! I was saying that you got the point. I wasn't being sarcastic.
The consistency and steadiness of a hospitable environment is the main factor.
The numbers are suggested averages. All rooms can be different. But steady with low stress wins the race.
I totally know what u meant. Thats what sucks about this venue. Tone is not conveyed.
What i meant was, you have a very very valid point about consistency. I cant rule that out as my reason for doing better. Again, its hard to stay objective.
Were all buds here.
With small plant counts, small scale farmerls like myself can pick colas as they become ripe throughout the plant. larger ops dont always have that luxury.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?