• Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • General Indoor Growing
  • Help me decipher PPM readings, please.

Help me decipher PPM readings, please.

  • Thread starter Thread starter CannaDana
  • Start date Start date Mar 28, 2022
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Help me decipher PPM readings, please.

CannaDana Mar 28, 2022 13 Replies 2,456 Views
Page 1 of 1 · Replies 1–14 of 14
1

CannaDana

Posts
201
Reactions
546
Joined
Sep 13, 2021
Points
93
Mar 28, 2022
#1
Hi! I need your help.

Today for the first time I checked the PPM coming out of my plants. I have two strains, both in Fox Farms soil. They are in mid-flower. One strain's leaves are dying off, and I thought it was a little soon, so worried I might have a lockout. So I checked one plant from each variety. Here's what I found:

WATER GOING INTO PLANTS: 220 ppm
WATER COMING OUT OF KUSH MINTS (the "good" plants): 980 ppm
WATER COMING OUT OF GG4 (the "dying" plants): 630 ppm

What does this mean??? The plants I thought were fine are reading 2070. The plants I feared were locked out are reading 630 ppm. Both varieties get fed the same amount at the same times. So, questions:

1. What does this mean in terms of salt build-up in the soil?
2. How can the two strains be so completely different in runoff?
3. What do I need to do, if anything?

Here are photos.

GG4, the “dying” 630 ppm plants (the saggy leaves are more due to me letting them dry out to get the truest reading I could):


Kush Mints, the “good” 980 ppm plants:


What's the answer? Often, I think the best answer is "do nothing." I'm very confused by these results, though.

Thanks for your insights, you guys really help!
 
Last edited: Mar 28, 2022
Quote Reply

CannaDana

Posts
201
Reactions
546
Joined
Sep 13, 2021
Points
93
Mar 28, 2022
#2
My instincts tell me I should feed the GG4 more than I have been, and not feed the Kush Mints anything but plain water. Is this the right answer?

Does the fact that PPM is more coming out than going in mean anything important?
 
Last edited: Mar 28, 2022
Reactions: SmokinJo421, Maxwax and PK1
Quote Reply

Maxwax

Posts
335
Reactions
562
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Points
93
Mar 28, 2022
#3
Im new but I agree. That PPM is twice what it should be on the Kush and lower than it should be on the GG4. You can even see the nitrogen and probably potassium deficiency clearly. Since the GG is looking ok that hot I wouldnt flush....yet so yeah straight waterings. Are you positive those numbers are correct?
 
Reactions: steamroller
Quote Reply

CannaDana

Posts
201
Reactions
546
Joined
Sep 13, 2021
Points
93
Mar 28, 2022
#4
Maxwax said:
Im new but I agree. That PPM is twice what it should be on the Kush and lower than it should be on the GG4. You can even see the nitrogen and probably potassium deficiency clearly. Since the GG is looking ok that hot I wouldnt flush....yet so yeah straight waterings. Are you positive those numbers are correct?
Click to expand...

No, they were not correct. I was wrong about the Kush Mints. I retested and Kush Mints (bottom) were at 980 while GG4 (top) was still at 630. I have edited the original post to reflect the correct numbers.

I want to emphasize that these are numbers I'm getting when I put in plain water, which has 220 ppm. So, the Kush Mints runoff is more than 4 times the ppm of the water that went in, while the GG4 was around 3 times the ppm going in. I have no idea what significance that has, if any. I'm brand new to this.
 
Reactions: steamroller
Quote Reply

Maxwax

Posts
335
Reactions
562
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Points
93
Mar 28, 2022
#5
CannaDana said:
No, they were not correct. I was wrong about the Kush Mints. I retested and Kush Mints (bottom) were at 980 while GG4 (top) was still at 630. I have edited the original post to reflect the correct numbers.

I want to emphasize that these are numbers I'm getting when I put in plain water, which has 220 ppm. So, the Kush Mints runoff is more than 4 times the ppm of the water that went in, while the GG4 was around 3 times the ppm going in. I have no idea what significance that has, if any. I'm brand new to this.
Click to expand...
I dont either, thats interesting. Tighter packed soil? IDK.
 
Reactions: CannaDana
Quote Reply

phxazcraig

Posts
598
Reactions
712
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Points
93
Mar 28, 2022
#6
I wish I knew. I'm seeing weird PPM/EC runoff in my plants ever since they went into flower. Before then my runoff EC/PPM was lower than the input, indicating plants hungrily devouring all the nutes.
In flower my runoff PPM is much higher than input. Because I'm growing in coco, watering is different, but maybe it's like soil but faster. In that case I might give some useful data points. I tried flushing, mostly by just running 4x the usual watering at one event. I'm already watering/fertilizing 5x daily with more than 20% runoff, yet my PPM was still building up.

The 'flush' helped lower the runoff quite a bit, but it just kept rising 50ppm per watering. I next tried increasing the amount of water each event, from a 25-second watering to a 45-second one. My water/nutes use went through the roof, and I had about 75% runoff. Yet the PPM still rose.

Next I tried lowering the input PPM, a lot. That worked, so I'm continuing along that line. My guess is I have a lot of evaporation going on since I added a powered input fan blowing more-or-less on the pots. My thinking is that I may be putting in an input of X PPM and getting a runoff of 1.5x, so the roots must be seeing even higher than 1.5x. I'm seeing tip burn indicating that plants are seeing too much PPM even with a fairly tame input dose.

Being coco, I have tools you don't in soil, and one is increasing frequency of waterings. I'm now trying 7x daily waterings, with times cut to add to the old total of 5x. I want to see if I can balance out evaporation this way, if that's what is going on. In soil, I think the only good approach may be a long stretch of lower-dose waterings, possibly preceded by a bit of a flush if things were toxic. But your plants don't look too bad, so I'm thinking no flush. Why plants side-by-side react so different? No idea.
 
Reactions: CannaDana
Quote Reply

steamroller

Posts
1,814
Reactions
4,521
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Points
263
Mar 28, 2022
#7
I would feed the gg. I agree with Max on k being needed . I have plants doing the same now .
To really know what is excess run off you need to know what the water does through fresh soil.
Then you could have a base . Then you could know if either was high or low .
 
Reactions: Franimal, growsince79 and CannaDana
Quote Reply

growsince79

Posts
9,063
Reactions
15,608
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Points
313
Mar 28, 2022
#8
CannaDana said:
No, they were not correct. I was wrong about the Kush Mints. I retested and Kush Mints (bottom) were at 980 while GG4 (top) was still at 630. I have edited the original post to reflect the correct numbers.

I want to emphasize that these are numbers I'm getting when I put in plain water, which has 220 ppm. So, the Kush Mints runoff is more than 4 times the ppm of the water that went in, while the GG4 was around 3 times the ppm going in. I have no idea what significance that has, if any. I'm brand new to this.
Click to expand...
Check out the runoff of new ff soil. Mine varies from 2000-3000ppm.
 
Reactions: steamroller, Grapefruitroop and CannaDana
Quote Reply

Madbud

Posts
3,906
Reactions
7,416
Joined
Jul 15, 2017
Points
263
Mar 28, 2022
#9
I don’t like measuring runoff in soil, do a slurry test. Sounds like salts building up for a good flush.
 
Reactions: Grapefruitroop and CannaDana
Quote Reply

Grapefruitroop

Posts
510
Reactions
690
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Points
93
Mar 29, 2022
#10
Yeah , measuring PPM in soil is a waste of time.....
PPM readers, measure the level of dissolved solids ina liquid....is used in soilless medium to calculate the total amount of nutrient that you aim for....
In soil you have too many dissolved solid that arent nutrients so you arent calculating the amount of nutrients but them togheter with other unknown particles....like....mud.. etc...

Long story short....measuring runoff will be very decieving and confusing.....leave it for the hydro peeps

Another point to consider is that you are using a mix that have peat in it, that means you have a pretty good CEC level that will keep some nutrient bond to the soil and the water will be unable to flush em away.....another reason why analizyn the runoff of a soil grow is not helpful....
 
Reactions: Maxwax and CannaDana
Quote Reply

Grapefruitroop

Posts
510
Reactions
690
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Points
93
Mar 29, 2022
#11
BTW the plants looks good, normal fading to me.....maybe start to decrease nutrients in the ones that looks more dark greeen
 
Reactions: growsince79 and CannaDana
Quote Reply

Edinburgh

Posts
2,692
Reactions
3,831
Joined
Apr 2, 2019
Points
263
Mar 29, 2022
#12
You check your pH by the runoff, an electric pH meter will tell you your pH, mine is 6.2 but a cannabis plant can handle a pH of 5.8 to 7.00 but that is not optimal, in other words your meter is converting nute part per mill and converting it to a pH reading.
 
Reactions: CannaDana
Quote Reply

CannaDana

Posts
201
Reactions
546
Joined
Sep 13, 2021
Points
93
Mar 29, 2022
#13
Grapefruitroop said:
Yeah , measuring PPM in soil is a waste of time.....
PPM readers, measure the level of dissolved solids ina liquid....is used in soilless medium to calculate the total amount of nutrient that you aim for....
In soil you have too many dissolved solid that arent nutrients so you arent calculating the amount of nutrients but them togheter with other unknown particles....like....mud.. etc...

Long story short....measuring runoff will be very decieving and confusing.....leave it for the hydro peeps

Another point to consider is that you are using a mix that have peat in it, that means you have a pretty good CEC level that will keep some nutrient bond to the soil and the water will be unable to flush em away.....another reason why analizyn the runoff of a soil grow is not helpful....
Click to expand...

Thank you. This makes total sense to me. Not sure why someone here told me I needed to do this. I thought it might be a waste of time in soil, as what you said seems obvious.
 
Reactions: Edinburgh, steamroller and growsince79
Quote Reply

SmokinJo421

Posts
315
Reactions
207
Joined
Jun 18, 2022
Points
43
Jun 21, 2022
#14
CannaDana said:
My instincts tell me I should feed the GG4 more than I have been, and not feed the Kush Mints anything but plain water. Is this the right answer?

Does the fact that PPM is more coming out than going in mean anything important?
Click to expand...
Check out this video on YouTube
The channel is "grow your greens"
And I found it by searching that channel by 9/11 rule. They break it down in an understandable way.
 
Quote Reply
Page 1 of 1 · Replies 1–14 of 14
1

Thread info

Replies 13
Views 2,456
Started Mar 28, 2022
Latest post Jun 21, 2022
Starter CannaDana
Forum General Indoor Growing

Latest posts

  • OG Kush Bx first SOG grow!
    • Latest: jaygrowstew
    • 1 minute ago
    Grow Diaries
  • S
    MK-V by Hoku seeds-THCV weed!
    • Latest: screenager420
    • 26 minutes ago
    Organic Soil
  • Major THCFarmer Upgrades Are Rolling Out
    • Latest: Afterburner
    • 33 minutes ago
    Site Announcements
  • SHOW US WHAT YOUR BREEDING!
    • Latest: Afterburner
    • 42 minutes ago
    The Breeders Lab
  • Early Flowering on my outdoor grow
    • Latest: Thumbuddy
    • 52 minutes ago
    General Outdoor Growing
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • General Indoor Growing
  • Help me decipher PPM readings, please.
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2026 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Sign up

  • Home
  • News
  • Classifieds
  • Forums
    • What's new Featured content New posts New Articles New articles New products Latest activity
  • Social
  • Strains
  • Live
  • Learn
  • Brands
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?