F
Fotzenschlaeger
- Posts
- 29
- Reactions
- 43
- Joined
- May 23, 2025
- Points
- 13
It's Fruit Spirit and they are 5 weeks old. I topped the plant above 5th node and removed lower stems as I'm planning to do manifold. Its 240w LED at 80% intensity and it's about 47cm away from plants. Last time I did overwatering so I wanted to be more cautious this time. If it is underwatering how come only one plant looks like that and the second one seems to be normal? I will try to water more then, next watering I want to flush them with clean water only.What strain? How old are they? To me it looks under watered. Why did you take leaves off already? How strong is that light, how close is it from plants?
It's universal garden soil and yes, I've been watering only around the stem about every 3rd day. Next time I will soak the whole area, thank youDon't just water so close to the stem. Make a ring around the whole pot. Plants are individuals like people, some are more fit than others. Your fear of over watering is probably causing you to water less and more frequently which can be just as bad. I don't know what your medium is so it's hard to give advice. What I can say is: If it's soil, give it a good soaking and have the patience to let it dry back, if it's coco, that's a whole other story.
They are photoperiod. Do autoflowers require different style of watering? Sorry I'm no native English speaker so I hope that sentence makes senseYes bring the water out as far as the leaf ends. Auto or photoperiod? I lift the pot for water weight, lots use a meter.
They are photoperiod. Do autoflowers require different style of watering? Sorry I'm no native English speaker so I hope that sentence makes sensenext time I will soak the whole area, thank you.
Best luck with those plants, I'm glad they are photoperiods they are more tolerant to easy mistakes. Your plants will be fineThanks for advices everyoneI'm gonna let you know how it's going in few weeks
Too much light for early vegetation. 25% at 60 cm would be better. The Photone app for phones is helpful for setting the light level.Its 240w LED at 80% intensity and it's about 47cm away from plants.
I was following manufacturer info on the lamp. Isn't 25% too little? The lamp guide says 50% for germination 80% for vegetative phase and 100% for bloom phase. Also I hanged the lamp a bit higher as the manufacturer recommends. Lot of guides say the best is to follow instructions on the lamp. Wouldn't the light burn mean that the tips of the leaves are turning yellow? This isn't happening in my case.Too much light for early vegetation. 25% at 60 cm would be better. The Photone app for phones is helpful for setting the light level.
no, that level of light is intense especially when your plant is not thriving. so dial it back down to 40-50% at least.I was following manufacturer info on the lamp. Isn't 25% too little? The lamp guide says 50% for germination 80% for vegetative phase and 100% for bloom phase. Also I hanged the lamp a bit higher as the manufacturer recommends. Lot of guides say the best is to follow instructions on the lamp. Wouldn't the light burn mean that the tips of the leaves are turning yellow? This isn't happening in my case.
I have an empty tent. I have a 400 watt panel.Always keep your lights as bright as you can. 500 umols from 24" away is not the same as 500 umols at 48". It's all about the inverse square law. My lazy stoner brain didn't want to do too much typing this morning so I asked Gemini for help.
Let's look at your 12" tall plant under two different light setups, both dialed to hit exactly 500 umol at the top canopy.
Scenario A: Light at 24" (Dimmed or Lower Power)
Distance to Top: 24 inches (Intensity = 500\ \mu\text{mol})
Distance to Bottom: 36 inches (The 24" gap + the 12" height of the plant)
The Math: \left(\frac{24}{36}\right)^2 = (0.66)^2 \approx 0.44
Light at Bottom: 500 \times 0.44 = 222 umol
Scenario B: Light at 48" (Full Power)
Distance to Top: 48 inches (Intensity = 500\ \mu\text{mol})
Distance to Bottom: 60 inches (The 48" gap + the 12" height of the plant)
The Math: \left(\frac{48}{60}\right)^2 = (0.80)^2 = 0.64
Light at Bottom: 500 \times 0.64 = 320 umol
The Verdict: 44% More Light at the Bottom
By hanging the light higher and running it at a higher power (Scenario B), the bottom of your plant receives nearly 100 \mumols more light than it does in Scenario Aβeven though the "top" of the plant feels the exact same intensity in both cases.
You can save yourself the trouble of doing the math because it's a law of physics. It's the reason why the bottom of a 15' tall outdoor plant gets the "same" umols as the top. The distance to the source is 93 million miles. The last 15' is mathematically insignificant. Adjust those numbers to reflect our situation, going from 24" to 48" is a 50% difference. The math definitely checks out.I have an empty tent. I have a 400 watt panel.
I will verify this with a lux meter in the next few days.
Will do easy maf.
Both tops at 45000 lux. Panel at 50% and 100 %
Measure down 12 inches.
Will not take long but I am cleaning mode now.
Now I feel all sciencey......
the sun is no way in hell 93 million miles away, but anyhoo,..You can save yourself the trouble of doing the math because it's a law of physics. It's the reason why the bottom of a 15' tall outdoor plant gets the "same" umols as the top. The distance to the source is 93 million miles. The last 15' is mathematically insignificant. Adjust those numbers to reflect our situation, going from 24" to 48" is a 50% difference. The math definitely checks out.
Closer to 150 million miles, but I understand what you're saying, and it's correct.The distance to the source is 93 million miles.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?