bongzaway
- 316
- 93
Hadn't heard that.. a lot of guys I know are still running greenhouses including myselfFor those that don't know. Yep. NO more outdoor grows whether it be rec or MMJ. They are "illegal."
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think thatz that truth :puke2::badboy::crying2::drunk::sweating::mad:
How does a state legalize a plant then make it illegal to grow.For those that don't know. Yep. NO more outdoor grows whether it be rec or MMJ. They are "illegal."
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think thatz that truth :puke2::badboy::crying2::drunk::sweating::mad:
Got any sauce? Aka source?
Cool story bruhwell I'm in Cali and we are growing outdoors AGAIN. lol
Nope..it's pretty clear to me. No plants outdoors.Yea so greenhouse with cover should be fine we have never had the right to openly grow outdoors. Correct me if in wrong
Only you can do that! I am in the metro area and outdoors have always been a no-go for me, but I'm assuming this would have more of an effect outside the metro area in more rural areas. I assume the people in those areas will continue to do what they do. If they haven't had any issues before they probably won't have any as a result of this legislation, unless it encourages snitches or turns into a revenue stream via code enforcement or similar avenue.Yea so greenhouse with cover should be fine we have never had the right to openly grow outdoors. Correct me if in wrong
I think they want it that way. They'll let us grow, but they'll make us pay for it at every possible instance, and they know they are working with language that is open to interpretation. It makes everyone happy. Those who champion the anti-pot legislation can sleep better knowing pot isn't grown outdoors *snort*, and those who know the law and know their rights and have paid their retainer will continue to do what they do, knowing they can fight it if they have to.I can't edit my above post. Law says things must be locked and secure and not visable..that pertains to indoor. Then clearly then state "no plants can be outside." You can still get busted and fight out the interpetation in the courts.
I think we are in total agreement, but I don't really give a fuck what they put on a website. County prosecutors and LEO are not going to use this web page as evidence to enforce, they are going to go by the letter of the law. I believe the state is being intentionally misleading by saying no outdoor plants, because that's simply not the case. At the end of the day the argument is not outside or not outside, it's what is considered a locked, enclosed area. MMED doesn't want their precious tax dollars to go away, so they say what they want to say, since they can't write the law themselves. Or something.Having g things locked up, secured a not viable pertain to indoors. The CO webpage clearly states ...no plants can be outdoors.
A greenhouse with an end wall (door that locks) is cool with local authorities where I am.. fully enclosed and locked with poultry fence around itI can't edit my above post. Law says things must be locked and secure and not visable..that pertains to indoor. Then clearly then state "no plants can be outside." You can still get busted and fight out the interpetation in the courts.
A greenhouse with an end wall (door that locks) is cool with local authorities where I am.. fully enclosed and locked with poultry fence around it
SW CODid someone of "authority" from your county tell you that ? If yes, may I ask which county that was
SW CO
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?