Potfairy
- 45
- 18
If we just relied on true, proven science we'd be behind the times. You kind of have to fly by the seat of your pants and take a certain amount of anecdotal evidence into account before deciding what's best for you. Given the historical legal status, there's been very little high-grade studies. I get your point of view. I'm a neuroscientist by trade. I've found botany and horticulture to be much less stringent in their requirements than many fields. That said, I just don't think you're going to be satisfied if you want an A to Z of how cannabis cultivation exactly works. We're just not there yet. Also realize that a lot of botanical and horticultural work of high quality is proprietary work. I think most folks here on the farm try and keep information as accurate as possible and are held to that by the mods.I have grown weary of poor forum moderation, pothead “bro wisdom”, and the seemingly incessantly contradictory anecdotal reports. So, as I generally do, I turned to the science community for peripherally associated articles and studies involving aeroponics.
Every properly proctored and designed scientific study lists the methodologies and processes to a minute degree, so that the information may be peer reviewed and replicated. I have learned that by reading the Methods, or Methodology sections of published and peer reviewed scientific studies, pertaining possibly only peripherally to the subject matter I’m researching, can have very valuable information.
In those veins, I offer the following paper listing a common scientific methodology for aeroponic cannabis cultivation. Enjoy.
Yield, Characterization, and Possible Exploitation of Cannabis Sativa L. Roots Grown under Aeroponics Cultivation
Darling, Im a Botanist by trade, raising, practice, and education. I am very well aware of advancement for the sake of knowledge rather than progress for progress’ sake.If we just relied on true, proven science we'd be behind the times. You kind of have to fly by the seat of your pants and take a certain amount of anecdotal evidence into account before deciding what's best for you. Given the historical legal status, there's been very little high-grade studies. I get your point of view. I'm a neuroscientist by trade. I've found botany and horticulture to be much less stringent in their requirements than many fields. That said, I just don't think you're going to be satisfied if you want an A to Z of how cannabis cultivation exactly works. We're just not there yet. Also realize that a lot of botanical and horticultural work of high quality is proprietary work. I think most folks here on the farm try and keep information as accurate as possible and are held to that by the mods.
I can understand. This is how I normally speak. Im not fond of reducing my language to single syllables in order to accommodate willful ignorance. If you would like an honest suggest about forum moderation, push addressed subjects to the threads that are discussing them, and stop pushing the concept of “necrothread” and allowing new repetitive threads on the same subject. Proper moderation would do all the weed forums a healthy bit of good.Questioning information and sources is a good thing. Can you explain what in this study your referring to that corrects your issues with forum moderation, bro science.
Many very knowledgeable ppl here that provide some very relevant info. Is there something in particular we are supposed to be observing from this study? Oris it just to pass information along?
kinda seems like a shot at the forum members and staff using words that over complicate the message in an attempt to look more intelligent?
Maybe im reading that wrong but thats how it appears to me
wow seriously?Darling, Im a Botanist by trade, raising, practice, and education. I am very well aware of advancement for the sake of knowledge rather than progress for progress’ sake.
A proven baseline will always be useful to a a broad range of people and skill levels.
I understand many folks think they grow better, or the best, or know better. Its the scourge of the cannabis community. Fortunately I have empirical evidence I grow the some of, if not the, highest grade cleanest flower in Colorado, possibly the US. Aeroponic cloning is giving me hell, but considering Im using homemade equipment rather than laboratory grade, I'm not terribly surprised.
Considering I have never heard mention of Hoaglands solution being commonly discussed on any weed forum, I understand the education level I am most likely speaking to, despite any claims made towards a particularly educated background.
For those with eyes to see, and ears to hear, this post is here. For the rest who are into it for the self-discovery of facts others have long worked past, I wish you well in your journey.
why don’t you start your own website..I can understand. This is how I normally speak. Im not fond of reducing my language to single syllables in order to accommodate willful ignorance. If you would like an honest suggest about forum moderation, push addresses subjects to the threads that are discussing them, and stop pushing the concept of “necrothread” and allowing new repetitive threads on the same subject. Proper moderation would do all the weed forums a healthy bit of good.
If by reading the methodologies provided, you cant understand how a proven method helps the hundreds of people on here with the same incessant questions, I cant help you. Instead of arguing, being a Mod, try starting a conversation rather than seeming to “take offense”. Did you actually read the methodologies presented and have something intelligent to input?
keep it up and i’ll ban you from here.. seriously all your doing is showing your true self..This is posted so that others who are immensely weary of statements without anything but subjective “evidence” that doesn't extend beyond “their word”, such as “I’m a neuroscientist” or “I'm a botanist”, have an independent, objective, third-party reviewed source of evidence for a process or solution. Word of warning, there are people on these forums purposefully posting EXTREMELY inaccurate information while claiming 100% success or “massive buds”. They are doing it to mess with you.
I can see now that if I ever post more resources, I wont be posting any sort of accompanying statements except a dumbing down of concepts so that the average bro doesn't take it personally.
I would even delete this one, if I could, and repost without comment except to point out the obvious relevant facts for the oblivious.
By all means ignore wisdom and proven knowledge with evidence. I would hope some of you would appreciate actual proof of claims as opposed to a million different bros all claiming that “even though I do the opposite of you, my way works!”.
Ive grown every garden plant you can think of and more strains of cannabis than most of you will ever see. But those are words, pictures are pictures. A peer reviewed study listed on a scientifically associated public server is FAR better evidence. those who choose to see that, this is for you.
If you contiue reading past this post, I can only imagine you are stoned and looking for a laugh riot, have fun, there have already been some doozies posted
I bet you’re really fun at a party.
Maybe you can give me a heads up on what to expect in my current grow.This is posted so that others who are immensely weary of statements without anything but subjective “evidence” that doesn't extend beyond “their word”, such as “I’m a neuroscientist” or “I'm a botanist”, have an independent, objective, third-party reviewed source of evidence for a process or solution. Word of warning, there are people on these forums purposefully posting EXTREMELY inaccurate information while claiming 100% success or “massive buds”. They are doing it to mess with you.
I can see now that if I ever post more resources, I wont be posting any sort of accompanying statements except a dumbing down of concepts so that the average bro doesn't take it personally.
I would even delete this one, if I could, and repost without comment except to point out the obvious relevant facts for the oblivious.
By all means ignore wisdom and proven knowledge with evidence. I would hope some of you would appreciate actual proof of claims as opposed to a million different bros all claiming that “even though I do the opposite of you, my way works!”.
Ive grown every garden plant you can think of and more strains of cannabis than most of you will ever see. But those are words, pictures are pictures. A peer reviewed study listed on a scientifically associated public server is FAR better evidence. those who choose to see that, this is for you.
If you contiue reading past this post, I can only imagine you are stoned and looking for a laugh riot, have fun, there have already been some doozies posted
No one is asking you to dumb things down. There's just no reason to be a douche bag.I can understand. This is how I normally speak. Im not fond of reducing my language to single syllables in order to accommodate willful ignorance...
I too am disturbed intellectually by contradictory info. Disturbed is the wrong word, challenged may be better. I'd like to know more than I do. I'd like to understand when someone does something contradictory to my knowledge base and it works well what happened? Bad data? My "knowledge" is bad, or what's being posted is? It's a puzzle and we do not have all the pieces, but we can see and feel the missing shapes and densities and make guesses.I have grown weary of poor forum moderation, pothead “bro wisdom”, and the seemingly incessantly contradictory anecdotal reports. So, as I generally do, I turned to the science community for peripherally associated articles and studies involving aeroponics.
I believe the correct phrase is "give your balls a tug." You are a canuck, you should know that!wow seriously?
give your head a shake man..
just like that bugbee character pretending to know all about lights..
Plants, dogs, and cats for me haha!I find it amusing that someone with such a high intelligence doesn't have the grasp on basic human communication. Sometimes I really prefer plants to people.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?