N
Night
- Posts
- 13
- Reactions
- 6
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2010
This is a crosspost that I just posted in the Infirmary. I got carried away though and would like to see if my question will harbour some light here also?
This is kind of a theoretical question. Some of you may have direct experience or more knowledge of plant growth/genetics than me (none :P).
Say you start with healthy clones. They have 3-6 nodes. Something environments happens. Whatever... cold temps, electricity went out, unskilled grower etc.
They got stressed and all newer growth is fucked: unproportionate growth of fan leaves (one larger than other), single-blade leaves, single blade couple with 3-blade leaves, what have you.
Are the clones worthless now? If you retune your environment correctly, will they grow the way they should from that point on? Or have their genetics/code been permanently damaged? Will they recover but the high will never be as good compared to how it originally was going to be?
Could all of these scenarios happen? Some? How does one find the right path, hopefully an alternative to the school of hard knocks, to this sort of knowledge?
I understand that learning to grow correctly from the start is the right direction, but in my opinion that leaves holes in one's knowledge.
Think of Actions and Effects. Add in Homeostasis. A well grown plant should be in Homeostasis. It is achieved and maintained through the correct Effects from the correct Actions, of which there may be only one, several, or more than one as a series for one particular aspect/goal/attribute. These Effects manifest themselves physically and biologically to maintain Homeostasis (plant health).
Homeostasis is sometimes easily fixed as seen in this forum... you add Cal-Mag for this, K for that, etc.
BUT, sometimes, can the homeostasis of some aspects of plants health ever be reached again past a point X?
AM I TOO FUCKIN HIGH BRO? or can someone point me in the right direction for this KNOWLEDGE and the KNOWLEDGE to know that a particular INFORMATION should be assimilated as a true KNOWLEDGE?
This is kind of a theoretical question. Some of you may have direct experience or more knowledge of plant growth/genetics than me (none :P).
Say you start with healthy clones. They have 3-6 nodes. Something environments happens. Whatever... cold temps, electricity went out, unskilled grower etc.
They got stressed and all newer growth is fucked: unproportionate growth of fan leaves (one larger than other), single-blade leaves, single blade couple with 3-blade leaves, what have you.
Are the clones worthless now? If you retune your environment correctly, will they grow the way they should from that point on? Or have their genetics/code been permanently damaged? Will they recover but the high will never be as good compared to how it originally was going to be?
Could all of these scenarios happen? Some? How does one find the right path, hopefully an alternative to the school of hard knocks, to this sort of knowledge?
I understand that learning to grow correctly from the start is the right direction, but in my opinion that leaves holes in one's knowledge.
Think of Actions and Effects. Add in Homeostasis. A well grown plant should be in Homeostasis. It is achieved and maintained through the correct Effects from the correct Actions, of which there may be only one, several, or more than one as a series for one particular aspect/goal/attribute. These Effects manifest themselves physically and biologically to maintain Homeostasis (plant health).
Homeostasis is sometimes easily fixed as seen in this forum... you add Cal-Mag for this, K for that, etc.
BUT, sometimes, can the homeostasis of some aspects of plants health ever be reached again past a point X?
AM I TOO FUCKIN HIGH BRO? or can someone point me in the right direction for this KNOWLEDGE and the KNOWLEDGE to know that a particular INFORMATION should be assimilated as a true KNOWLEDGE?
