az2000
- Posts
- 965
- Reactions
- 1,077
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2019
- Points
- 143
Changing lights also changes demands of the plant. Most LED growers seem to need more Mg I never really looked into why but I probably should.
Yeah... I looked for that too. I. My experience light burn will cover more leaf area. But I don't feel confident enough to say it's not either lol. Definitely more ppfd out of that fixture but if his lumen is the same as previous it shouldn't be different. Only the height would be.I thought about that, but it doesn't look like mg. And, presuming the CXB is providing more/better light than the mars & galaxy, the plant would eat more (which should reduce the chance of accidental overfeeding)?
To me it looks like nute burn, or a deficiency like you and others say.
But, I still think it's significant that the OP has grown for 6 years and has a gut feeling it's the lights. His own lux targets are too high compared to modern household LED lightbulbs. That makes me think he developed those with a less efficient light, and is now giving to much more-efficient light.
Watts per square foot might clear that up. CXB cobs are probably in the 25w/sq ft range. If he's using it in that range, then it probably isn't the lights.
Yeah... I looked for that too. I. My experience light burn will cover more leaf area. But I don't feel confident enough to say it's not either lol. Definitely more ppfd out of that fixture but if his lumen is the same as previous it shouldn't be different. Only the height would be.
tap water which was 150 ppm, ran through pot and it shows 950-990 ppm :(
but ph is normal , somewhere between 6 -7 ,
when i water with nutrients the solution is about 950 ppm and 6.2 - 6.5 ph, when just watering its 150 ppm and 7.2-7.3 ph.
6or 7? got to dial in on precise number friend,plant dont flux like that,there picky,how much did you use to flush it,flush with your tap,the ppm is cool what ph is your water another thing,you gonna have to run more water threw to flush the stuff out,when you get close then check ph and get it dialed in ,then take your nutes and ph adjust were they supose to be,950 aint it,never mind i dont think your getting a rednecks picture,sorry to botherguys , i just checked runoff and it seems my plants dont feed at all, i used tap water which was 150 ppm, ran through pot and it shows 950-990 ppm :(
but ph is normal , somewhere between 6 -7 ,
when i water with nutrients the solution is about 950 ppm and 6.2 - 6.5 ph, when just watering its 150 ppm and 7.2-7.3 ph.
if ppm is wrong should ph be ok ? ? ?
What nutrients are you using? I'm going to guess bloom nutrients. Do you notice this more when you switch to bloom nutes?here some photos of previous project in same growbox and conditions , its mid flowering stage and you can see a little progress of yellowing leaves
Definitely more ppfd out of that fixture but if his lumen is the same as previous it shouldn't be different. Only the height would be.
6or 7? got to dial in on precise number friend,plant dont flux like that,there picky,how much did you use to flush it,flush with your tap,the ppm is cool what ph is your water another thing,you gonna have to run more water threw to flush the stuff out,when you get close then check ph and get it dialed in ,then take your nutes and ph adjust were they supose to be,950 aint it,never mind i dont think your getting a rednecks picture,sorry to bother
What nutrients are you using? I'm going to guess bloom nutrients. Do you notice this more when you switch to bloom nutes?
this problem starts from early weg and slowly progresses in late flowering stage
Was thinking LED to LED should not be to much different and looks like same issues previously if I'm reading the post right... Sometimes I'm challenges like that. But again it could be light burn but I'm leaning away from that. I could be wrong it's not like that's anything new lol.I didn't understand that. You can have many more ppfd than lumens. HPS would produce less ppfd per lumen. CXB cobs would produce more ppfd per lumen.
You're using Fox Farms "trio." Isn't that for soil? And, you're in soilless?
Again, if this is a new problem I don't think it's your nutrients. But, I would use hydro nutrients (like GH Flora 3-part) in peat, without any soil added to it. Using nutrients that depend on an organically-active soil seems like it could be problematic.
when i water with nutrients the solution is about 950 ppm and 6.2 - 6.5 ph, when just watering its 150 ppm and 7.2-7.3 ph.
what do you mean ? if i use peat and perlite its not soil ?
6.5 is about where you want it.
Never used peat other than to buffer pH naturally in aquariums. Assumed it's more of a soil. Either way I can't see it being a good medium but that's just my uneducated opinion. To acidic.That's for soil. (And, soil ph can swing a full point between wet and dry. I don't believe it can be locked in as precisely as hydro.). Soilless should be between 5.5 and 6.0.<<link
When I grew soilless, I think I did 5.8-6.0 in veg, and 6.0-6.2 in flower. (I can't remember).
That's for soil. (And, soil ph can swing a full point between wet and dry. I don't believe it can be locked in as precisely as hydro.). Soilless should be between 5.5 and 6.0.<<link
When I grew soilless, I think I did 5.8-6.0 in veg, and 6.0-6.2 in flower. (I can't remember).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?