MIMedGrower
- Posts
- 17,190
- Reactions
- 53,530
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Points
- 438
Never used peat other than to buffer pH naturally in aquariums. Assumed it's more of a soil. Either way I can't see it being a good medium but that's just my uneducated opinion. To acidic.
Considered soil or hydro cause I always looked at it as soil? I can see if it's amended or mixed but on its own... Not so good. Again. Never grown so not sure if it generally comes already amended.Peat lite mix needs a buffer like lime or oyster shell. Balances perfectly.
Considered soil or hydro cause I always looked at it as soil? I can see if it's amended or mixed but on its own... Not so good. Again. Never grown so not sure if it generally comes already amended.
And in terms of ph? I understood it as soil. I just want to make sure I'm not passing along bad info. Yeah coco I understand is basically hydro. I always thought peat was soil. Plants diagnosis is all the same but the difference in available nutrients is not.Peat lite mix is more like soil to grow in than hydro except we have to supply all the nutrients.
Coco seems more hydro like. Its inert. Peat has organic qualities.
I can see if it's amended or mixed but on its own... Not so good.
Peat has organic qualities.
I'm a head first guy. Still have a long time to go until soil Soni will definitely get my shit together on it. The whole reason I'm switching to soil is for a more organic approach. That being said I would not have an issue putting synthetic nutes in if needed. It will take a few grows to get it all tweaked to get it organic start to finish but Rather start closer to my goalThe other day you posted that you're planning to grow in soil(?). If so, you should do soilless once using Pro-Mix HP (peat with 35% perlite) and 25% more perlite added. Use GH Flora series 3-part. And, follow the so-called "useless" schedule (google for it, it's on the growkind forum. I followed it exactly. But, if I used it again, I'd reduce the strength 10%. I saw someone say they'd reduce it 20%.). I would add 1 to 1.5 Tablespoons dolomite lime per gallon of mix.
I think it's a great way to grow. It would be an intermediate step between your current hydro growing, and soil.
I think it's a great for first-time growers. Not that you're one. But, it could be useful to make that stop on your way to soil, so you could be familiar with it. There's no soil variables involved. No mystery of organic materials breaking down and feeding the plant. Much more immediate feedback. It's like hydro without the setup. It's hard to mess up if the new grower can just pay attention, mix the right amounts, know when the medium is dry. Every 2 days for that mix above.
Pro-Mix HP is neutralized already. If you bought an ordinary bale of peat at Home Depot, you'd probably have to do something with that before using it. I add dolomite to Pro-Mix because I've read that Pro-Mix doesn't have enough for the entire grow. Especially when feeding heavily, and the salts will drag the ph down too. It doesn't seem to hurt to add dolomite. It's not immediate acting like hydrated lime. It doesn't move the ph much. It's just there if needed. (Sometimes I wonder how much washes out. It's a loose texture medium. I'm sure some gets trapped. But, I bet some washes out too.).
it breaks down into carbon?In what way? It is organic matter (like coco). It's typically added to soil for it's ability to not compress, maintain some fluff. Water holding capacity. And, the carbon it provides as it breaks down. But, it's not considered organically active like soil. In fact, it's considered sterile (by comparison). It's often recommended for seedling beds for that reason, being less likely to carry pathogens (not a fertile host for such things, like soil is).
it breaks down into carbon?
Would still be considered organic. Maybe not a great source of nutrients but still would be. Also coco would not support microbial life as well as peat. So I think that's part what @MIMedGrower is saying? I can't speak to him but kinda what I get from itThe brown component of compost. Like leaves, peanut shells. No significant nutrient content (like bird poop or green grass cuttings). Just carbon as a component to the microbial action. (I.e., you wouldn't grow in leaves by themselves. Soil would be leaves and other things broken down.).
And in terms of ph? I understood it as soil. I just want to make sure I'm not passing along bad info. Yeah coco I understand is basically hydro. I always thought peat was soil. Plants diagnosis is all the same but the difference in available nutrients is not.
In what way? It is organic matter (like coco). It's typically added to soil for it's ability to not compress, maintain some fluff. Water holding capacity. And, the carbon it provides as it breaks down. But, it's not considered organically active like soil. In fact, it's considered sterile (by comparison). It's often recommended for seedling beds for that reason, being less likely to carry pathogens (not a fertile host for such things, like soil is).
Would still be considered organic. Maybe not a great source of nutrients but still would be. Also coco would not support microbial life as well as peat. So I think that's part what @MIMedGrower is saying? I can't speak to him but kinda what I get from it
Would still be considered organic. Maybe not a great source of nutrients but still would be. Also coco would not support microbial life as well as peat. So I think that's part what @MIMedGrower is saying? I can't speak to him but kinda what I get from it
Even ocean forest and the like are really just growing mediums with a starter charge and some organic ammendment.
Yeah I kinda derailed this for my own info gain sorry OP. I always like to get the principals in depth to the point I can understand why and explain it. The way I see it if you have the answer and can't explain the why then you do not truely have the answer. Just the way my brain works.I agree. I don't believe the lines are perfectly clear about what's soil. My soil is 56% Pro-Mix HP (peat and perlite), 22% soil potting mix, and 22% perlite. That's "mostly" soilless. And, yet, it's not "soilless." It contains soil. Compoted materials (to varying degrees.).
Perhaps pouring the "trio" into soilless medium makes it a soil medium. But, I'm trying to say (without getting into all the details we have) is that, if the goal is to make soilless medium soil, why not do that before planting? Have a medium that is immediately hospitable to the microbial action expected to occur with the nutrients used?
If there's a reason to not do that, why not use hydro nutrients and feed the roots directly (as soilless is typically done), and not depend on a microbial envionment that doesn't exist?
I don't think that has to get into the nebulous world of how much soil is soil. No soil is clearly no soil.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?