Remember Lumens Is For Humans, About Par, Ppf, Ppfd And Dli

  • Thread starter jumpincactus
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
Great write up on the science of all things lighting for plants. Written specifically relating to LED tech the science is the same no matter the light source you choose. Enjoy!!



About PAR, PPF, PPFD and DLI

When LEDs arrived on the market, their tremendous efficiency and money-saving potential changed the playing field, and lumens, lux and footcandles finally became obsolete metrics for determining light requirements for plants.

Recently, people have began referring to PAR, PPF and PPFD as ways to measure light in photosynthetics lighting applications. The purpose of this article is to explain what these terms mean, correct some common misunderstandings and help growers understand how the science behind these terms can be used to determine proper light levels to grow happy, thriving plants.

What The Heck Is PAR?
Our LED fixtures emit extremely high PAR levels — far higher than any fixture we know of in our price range and well above it — a reason we recommend the purchase of a dimmer if you feel you may wish to reduce light levels at some point in the future and why we strongly recommend a dimmer if you require low light levels on a day-to-day basis. But what exactly is “PAR”?

PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) is a much used (and often misused) term. It is NOT a measurement or “metric” like feet, inches or kilos. Rather, it defines the type of light (scientists call light “electromagnetic radiation”) needed to support photosynthesis in plant life. Through photosynthesis, plants convert light energy into chemical energy, which is the food they use to grow and thrive.

As we all know, some light (like the light from a candle) is visible to the human eye and some (such as infrared) is not. Scientists define different types of light by their “wavelengths” and, for those who are interested, we publish the wavelengths emitted by our LEDs here. These different wavelengths make up the electromagnetic radiation “spectrum”. This spectrum includes X-rays, radio waves and infrared light (none of which are visible to the human eye) and light that we can see such as sunlight, and light from a red or blue LED.

Interestingly, plants use roughly the same part of the spectrum that’s visible to the human eye, but the wavelengths we perceive to be the brightest (i.e. green light) are not the most efficient wavelengths for photosynthesis.

2_SPYDRx_Ortho-e1471470996292.png

Fluence SPDYRx LED grow light emits a PPF of 730 µmol/s
So, the first thing to understand about PAR is that it is the part of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum (light) that is useful to plants and algae to activate photosynthesis — it is NOT a measurement. What really counts is PPF, PPFD and DLI.

When selecting a lighting system or fixture that will trigger and promote photosynthesis, there are three measurements that are important: how much light the fixture produces, how much of that light is available to the plants and how much light the plant receives during the photoperiod.

The first measurement is Photosynthetic Photon Flux or “PPF” which measures the total amount of light that is produced by a light source each second. Put another way, PPF tells us how much PAR is emitted by a light source per second. More technically, PPF measures the “photosynthetically active photons emitted by a lighting system per second”. This measurement is expressed in “micromoles per second” and we’ll get to micromoles in a minute. Note though, that PPF does not tell us how much of the measured light actually lands on the plants or any other surface. It is probably the second most important way of measuring a lighting system, but, for whatever reason, 99.9% of lighting companies don’t list it. Build My LED publishes this number for every fixture we build. PPF is expressed by scientists and light engineers as: μmol/second.

The second measurement is PPFD which measures the light that actually arrives at the plant or algae. Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density or “PPFD” is a measurement of the amount of light that actually reaches your plants and algae or, as a scientist might say: “the number of photosynthetically active photons that fall on a given surface each second”. PPFD is a ‘spot’ measurement of a specific location on your plant canopy, and it is measured in micromoles per square meter per second. This measurement is expressed by scientists and light engineers as: μmol/m2/s.

The third measurement is DLI (Day Light Integral) which measures the total amount of light that is delivered to a plant every day. The grower can think of DLI as the plant’s daily “dose” of light though a scientist would probably say DLI is a cumulative measurement of the total number of photons that reach the plants and algae during the daily photoperiod. DLI measures the number of “moles” of photons per square meter per day and is expressed as: mol/m2/d.

Obviously, if you leave your lights on longer, your plants absorb more light.
Or, put in more technical language, a lighting system with a lower PPF can deliver the same DLI to an aquarium compared to a lighting system with a higher PPF if the photoperiod is extended. DLI is analogous to the total amount of rain that falls during a storm, as opposed to how fast the rain fell (which would be PPFD). DLI is the most important metric for determining the overall growth rate of plants and algae. Once you know the preferred DLI of your plants and/or algae, you can easily set up a lighting system to deliver the required amount of light. Properly designed photosynthetic lighting systems start with defining the required DLI.

So, What Exactly Are Moles And Micromoles?
There are huge numbers of photons or “light particles” in visible light — in fact, the quantity is so large that we cannot easily express it using normal numbers, so we use two measurements commonly used by scientists when measuring huge quantities. The first number, which is called a Mole, is equal to something called “Avogadro’s number”, which is 602,214,150,000,000,000,000,000! For a more manageable number, a micromole is a millionth of a mole. Much better, right?! In plain English, a micromole of photons (which would be one millionth of Avogadro’s number) is 602 quadrillion. Since these numbers are so large, it is easier to reference quantities of light in moles and micromoles.

In summary:


  1. PPF tells us how many photons of light are emitted by a light source each second.
  2. PPFD tells us how densely the fixture distributes the light photons on a one meter square target (i.e. your plants and algae) in one second.
  3. DLI tells us how many photons were delivered to a one meter square target in a full photoperiod (i.e. a day).

Making It Simple
Every aquarium and lighting system is different, and there are numerous factors that affect the total amount of light which is delivered by a light fixture. So, while ‘lumens’ was easy, it really had no consistent link to the amount of light you were delivering to your plants and algae. PAR, PPF, PPFD and DLI are precise and consistent terms and measurements used by scientists, algae researchers, horticulturists and labs around the world — but they can be difficult to memorize and grasp. So here’s a way to make it easier:

Think of light as rain and the light fixture as a cloud.

PPF tells us how many raindrops are falling from a cloud every second — that’s easy.

Let’s assume that cloud produces one million raindrops per second. If it is a large cloud the size of the state of Texas, you probably wouldn’t even know it was raining outside. But, if the cloud was the size of a car, you would probably want to put on a life vest if you were directly under this cloud! The raindrop density (PPFD) from the car-sized cloud in the second scenario would be very apparent to the unfortunate person under it. It is the same scenario with lighting systems. PPF tells us how many photons are being produced by a lighting fixture every second, but it doesn’t tell us where the photons are landing. That’s why we need PPF-Density or PPFD.

As an example, a 48” LED light bar, with any of the beam angles we offer, may produce a total of 90 micromoles per second (PPF) — that’s from the entire fixture. But under it, when you measure the amount of light that arrives at the plant or algae, you are measuring the light that falls on one square meter of surface area every second (PPFD) — a far more important measurement if you are a plant and one where the number of micromoles is higher in a typical growth environment.

Recently, I had a customer e-mail me about this very fixture. He had seen our published PPF values and said “I heard your fixtures had really high PAR — but how can that be when the PAR is only 90 directly under the fixture…”

He was confusing the light emitted by the fixture which is 90 PPF (μmoles/second) with the light received by the plants, which is 375 PPFD (μmoles/m2/s). In this case, the 375 PPFD was measured six inches under the fixture.

As we have seen, the 375 PPFD is the important measurement of PAR — the Photosynthetically Active Radiation that matters to the plants. Ideally, you want to take spot measurements across your plant growth area and then average these numbers to get the most meaningful PPFD metric for your plants. In most applications, we are interested in the average amount of light being delivered to the plants…not just the maximum PPFD reading.

I hope this article has been useful — our goal is to help growers understand LED technology and the benefits of using this economical, environmentally sound and powerful light source to grow healthy plants.
 
Homesteader

Homesteader

3,477
263
Increasing electric rates..........Less heat/less cooling required..........Reduction in hazardous waste.............Reduction in evaporation........Targeted spectrum=Faster flower/higher terpene...................
 
mancdank

mancdank

8,108
313
Increasing electric rates..........Less heat/less cooling required..........Reduction in hazardous waste.............Reduction in evaporation........Targeted spectrum=Faster flower/higher terpene...................
So all taken into account I'm thinking 315s for the win :)
 
G

georgebush

25
3
Good read! I'm sure as the initial investment comes down we will see LED become the norm!
 
dennis001

dennis001

21
3
real HPS grow light is more than 2.1 umol/s/w, 1.37umol/s/w is the HPS for street lighting.
 
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
@jumpincactus what is recommended dli for flowering? no co2

6 to 12 mol·m-2·d-1 are medium-light crops,
12 to 18 mol·m-2·d-1 are high-light crops,
and those requiring more than 18 mol·m-2·d-1 are considered very highlight crops.

Here is a link to a paper from Purdue U and will help you determine what your DLI should be. It also has a geographical region map for a typical greenhouse location and average DLI around the country. It includes the math equations so you can factor measuring your own light application and convert from foot candles to PAR and PPFD.

https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ho/ho-238-w.pdf
 
Last edited:
Homesteader

Homesteader

3,477
263
I hear people talk about LEDs like they are all the same but it is like comparing cars. A Kia Sportage is a car but so is a Mercedes AMG GT Roadster. A Cree XP-G3 emitter can give off 190 Lumens per watt at their binning condition yet an epistar emitter (found on Blackdog and many others) is probably 100 lumens per watt. I would tell you for sure but their datasheets are shit.
 
nazarbattu

nazarbattu

458
93
Only one way to find out and analyze empirical data...a pudding test is in order but I think the expert L.E.D guys prefer to keep the tangible evidence to themselves. There's something eccentric about the egotistical nature of withholding what is desired.
Nazarbattu
 
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
Only one way to find out and analyze empirical data...a pudding test is in order but I think the expert L.E.D guys prefer to keep the tangible evidence to themselves. There's something eccentric about the egotistical nature of withholding what is desired.
Nazarbattu
Nice!!! Are you withholding from me what I desire????? LMAO Good to see you brother.!!!
 
Homesteader

Homesteader

3,477
263
Only one way to find out and analyze empirical data...a pudding test is in order but I think the expert L.E.D guys prefer to keep the tangible evidence to themselves. There's something eccentric about the egotistical nature of withholding what is desired.
Nazarbattu

Most info is on data sheets. I don't understand what you think they are hiding?
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

807
143
6 to 12 mol·m-2·d-1 are medium-light crops,
12 to 18 mol·m-2·d-1 are high-light crops,
and those requiring more than 18 mol·m-2·d-1 are considered very highlight crops.

Here is a link to a paper from Purdue U and will help you determine what your DLI should be. It also has a geographical region map for a typical greenhouse location and average DLI around the country. It includes the math equations so you can factor measuring your own light application and convert from foot candles to PAR and PPFD.

https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ho/ho-238-w.pdf

Thank you!!
 
nazarbattu

nazarbattu

458
93
Nice!!! Are you withholding from me what I desire????? LMAO Good to see you brother.!!!
Is there a video of start to finish of sides by sides showing the performance of the L.E.D's. Vs competing lights with lights obviously being the only change? My brain hurts from all the led info I've red but basically when I quit reading I stopped where the whitecoats suggest hps supplemental lighting. So have L.E.D's proven they outperform HID's yet?
Jumpingcactus how do you do it brother? Your stamina is unparalleled, I'm uh call you Johnny5 input input input lol. Always good to see you, well, ya know, read you rather.
Naz
 
Top Bottom