now i am not saying im correct about this theory, but i believe that having a high umol/s count in a 4x4 is NOT the best way to look at this. Ive seen this study, but when i run these lights @ 2.5-3 feet above canopy, its overkill and i get light bleaching. i raise my lights up to get a spread of 6'x5' < this is where i see the best results. i would love to share pics, but i am involved in partnerships and i simply cannot post pics due to mutual agreements.. so i do apologize. Never the less, in our industry, less is more. I would not take these measurements into consideration due to the lack of plant reaction of each study. Yes they give the values at certain distances, but is it practical?? I do not know the answer for i have not run the ACDC, DE agrotechs, or the DE Awings with any plants, just gavitas and epaps for me.
Anyways, ive been in the hydro store industry for quite some time as well and ive seen factual sell pitches that really dont benefit a grow. so i am skeptic on this one. My understanding of these lights is that to achieve full benefit, one must utilize cross lighting, not direct light within a foot print. Jair from
Gavita once told me, "you do not light a strict footprint, you light a room." so in other words, use the correct distance from fixture to fixture over total sq feet to achieve maximum lighting.
The new DE technology is pretty legit, but it was designed for big grows- commercial. they actually use it as supplement lighting and use the sun for the majority in big greenhouses in Holland. This tech has become very popular in the states, more than what was expected. might be the new trend for the next 2-3 years.
peace and love to you farmers.
time for me to fire one up.
:cigar:Z