Log In Register

Medical Marijuana Law In Washington State Clarified

  • Thread starter Thread starter LittleDabbie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Medical Marijuana Law In Washington State Clarified

LittleDabbie 22 Replies 3,148 Views
Page 1 of 2 · Replies 1–20 of 23
LittleDabbie

LittleDabbie

Supporter
Posts
11,813
Reactions
20,319
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Points
438
Law creates a voluntary database of patients and cracks down on unregulated dispensary sales.

85

Haiden Day, 6, right, who has Dravet Syndrome, a form of epilepsy that his parents treat with medical marijuana, looks on as Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, left, signs a bill Friday at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash., that overhauls Washington's medical marijuana market.

By RACHEL LA CORTE and GENE JOHNSON, Associated Press

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — Nearly two decades after voters passed a medical marijuana law that often left police, prosecutors and even patients confused about what was allowed, Gov. Jay Inslee signed a bill Friday attempting to clean up that largely unregulated system and harmonize it with Washington's new market for recreational pot.

Among the law's many provisions, it creates a voluntary registry of patients and, beginning next year, eliminates what have become in some cases large, legally dubious "collective gardens" providing cannabis to thousands of people.

Instead, those patients will be able to purchase medical-grade products at legal recreational marijuana stores that obtain an endorsement to sell medical marijuana, or they'll be able to participate in much-smaller cooperative grows, of up to just four patients.

And those big medical marijuana gardens will be given what lawmakers describe as a path to legitimacy: The state will grant priority in licensing to those that have been good actors, such as by paying business taxes.

"I am committed to ensuring a system that serves patients well and makes medicine available in a safe and accessible manner, just like we would do for any medicine," Inslee wrote in his signing message to the Legislature.

The proliferation of green-cross medical dispensaries has long been a concern for police and other officials who decry them as a masquerade for black-market sales. Some proprietors of new, state-licensed recreational pot businesses — saddled with higher taxes — called them unfair competitors.

Washington in 1998 became one of the first states to approve the use of marijuana for medical purposes, but the initiative passed by voters did not allow commercial sales. Instead, patients had to grow the marijuana for themselves or designate someone to grow it for them. The measure did not prohibit patients from pooling their resources together to have large collective gardens on a single property, but the size of some made law enforcement queasy, and raids sometimes resulted.

Medical marijuana growers repeatedly sought legislation that would validate their business model, coming closest in 2011, when the Legislature approved a bill to create a licensing framework for medical dispensaries. But then-Gov. Chris Gregoire vetoed much of the measure.

[READ: Business Slow During D.C.'s First 2 Days of Medical Marijuana]

This time, with the state seeking to support its nascent recreational pot industry after the passage of Initiative 502 in 2012, there was a financial impetus to pull the medical users into the recreational system. The recreational businesses pressed for a tight rein on the medical industry with newfound lobbying muscle, and the medical businesses countered with some of their own.

That left advocates concerned that the people who are actually sick were the ones losing out. Under the new system, patients will be buying more heavily taxed marijuana, and they'll be allowed to grow fewer plants at home.

"This is pejorative to patients while being friendly to those who are in the business of patients," said Muraco Kyashna-tocha, who operated a Seattle medical dispensary. "There are sincere patients who don't have any money. They're cancer patients who are being bankrupted by their treatment."

Under the new law, patients who join the voluntary registry will be allowed to possess three times as much marijuana as is allowed under the recreational law: 3 ounces dry, 48 ounces of marijuana-infused solids, 216 ounces liquid and 21 grams of concentrates. Such a patient could also grow up to six plants at home, unless authorized to receive more.

[ALSO: Medical Marijuana and the Heavy Hand of Government in California]

Patients who don't join the registry can possess the same as the recreational limit of 1 ounce, and grow up to four plants at home — which recreational users can't.

Sen. Ann Rivers, a Republican from La Center who was the sponsor of the measure, said that part of the reason the registry is so important is to find out if there are enough stores providing medical products to patients.

"We have no idea how many patients we have in this state," she said.

Inslee, who vetoed some minor sections of the bill, was joined during the signing by Ryan Day and his epileptic 6-year-old son, Haiden. The boy's seizures have been managed with an extracted liquid form of marijuana.

Day said the new law gives his family more certainty.

"We were under the threat every single year that the system was going to change in a way that was going to take away my ability to help my son," he said.

___

Johnson reported from Seattle.

 
Okay, just to be clear, the AP isn't unbiased news, Rachel La Corte is a hack who appeases the local politicians to get printed, and everything in that article is mind numbingly slanderous propaganda written from the perspective of the person who wrote the bill.

Maybe consider unsubscribing from the AP news updates, it's not real news, it's biased entertainment with an agenda. Putting biased articles into cyberspace only makes the problem we have with hack journalism in this country worse.
 
Last edited:
Okay, just to be clear, the AP isn't unbiased news, Rachel La Corte is a hack who appeases the local politicians to get printed, and everything in that article is mind numbingly slanderous propaganda written from the perspective of the person who wrote the bill.

Maybe consider unsubscribing from the AP news updates, it's not real news, it's biased entertainment with an agenda. Putting biased articles into cyberspace only makes the problem we have with hack journalism in this country worse.

And only putting 1 Sides biased agenda without showing the other does nothing to help either... Information is information its all relative when it comes to making an informed decision..

If you have more to post about a particular topic to show the other side feel free..
 
And only putting 1 Sides biased agenda without showing the other does nothing to help either... Information is information its all relative when it comes to making an informed decision..

If you have more to post about a particular topic to show the other side feel free..
This isn't an issue of sides, it's an issue of fiction vs. the true state of the world. Truth is enlightenment, misinformation is toxic.
 
I'm pretty sure everyone here has the gumption to see through it
 
To all those states talking about legal and recreational Marijuana: DO NOT VOTE FOR IT PEOPLE!!!!! THEY ARE THERE TO.FUCK YOU!!!! Once it's passed in your state you have a year or two and all hell will break loose and you will all get fucked over by big business. You can take that as gospel. Don't believe me? Vote for it then lol!!!!
 
This isn't an issue of sides, it's an issue of fiction vs. the true state of the world. Truth is enlightenment, misinformation is toxic.

Your welcome to have that opinion... And your welcome not to read the AP news as well..:D

If you have an issue with a single piece i can only encourage you to take it up with the author not the messenger.
 
Your welcome to have that opinion... And your welcome not to read the AP news as well..:D

If you have an issue with a single piece i can only encourage you to take it up with the author not the messenger.
Just assumed you would want to know you were spreading misinformation from a biased source. I know I would appreciate the heads up if it were the other way around.
 
Just assumed you would want to know you were spreading misinformation from a biased source. I know I would appreciate the heads up if it were the other way around.

I appreciate you sharing your opinion. If you feel the information is false again i urge you to post any evidence you have to contradict the article, after all thats what an open forums all about :)
 
I appreciate you sharing your opinion. If you feel the information is false again i urge you to post any evidence you have to contradict the article, after all thats what an open forums all about :)
What? You want me to go through line by line and contradict the article? I guess I don't have as much free time as you. My evidence is that I have resided in WA state since the inception of collective gardens and I live and breathe these events every day. My ex wife was a close college friend with that biatch, La Corte and I know her personally. She is a clueless hack who will write anything the sitting Governor/Mayor wants her to. That was her role under Gregoire, prior to Inslee, also.

This is just like the traveling with weed through Seatac issue you posted about. You are posting articles in states where you do not live and do not have actual first hand knowledge of what's going on. I don't understand people like you who inundate web forums with random articles all over the web about issues in places where they do not live and have no vested interest or actual knowledge of what's going on. It seems to me a very irresponsible and annoying way to get more likes and posts.

Whatever though, leave your article up, as long as people know that it's fiction. Go ahead and get the last word too, after all, this issue is just about pride and ego for you, so enjoy it, even if it's at the expense of the truth for those here who are actually stakeholders in these events. You are like talking to a brick wall and I got better chit to do...:p
 
What? You want me to go through line by line and contradict the article? I guess I don't have as much free time as you. :p


But yet you expect me to Vet the entire AP press core ?

I will leave the last word..

Its a quote..Two actually.

Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too. ~Voltaire

A free press can be good or bad, but, most certainly, without freedom a press will never be anything but bad. ~Albert Camus
 
Here is really what's going on, for anybody who cares. One of the few truthful articles written on the topic.



Higher Ground: Marijuana Is Medicine

By Michael A. Stusser Tue., Apr 28 2015 at 05:45PM

Last week, Gov. Inslee signed a bill that will essentially destroy Washington’s medical-marijuana system. You might not care, but you should.


When the team behind Initiative 502 wrote their marijuana law, they left the already well-established medical dispensaries and collective gardens out of the equation, assuming they’d be dealt with at a later date. Well, they were dealt with, all right—last week the Governor signed a bill to eliminate both entirely.

Lawmakers in Olympia had been looking to overhaul the parallel medical- and recreational-marijuana systems, and agreed on a bill (from hell) that will close each and every medical-marijuana dispensary. I’m not going to get all policy-wonky on this and lose my audience in the third sentence. (Still with me?) So lemme just break this down with one simple point:

For millions of Americans, marijuana is medicine. But most of us are not paying attention to this devastating legislative boondoggle, because—for most of us—cannabis is not stopping our seizures, halting our cancers, or helping to ease our chronic pain.

Yes, hundreds of storefronts are currently posing as medicinal dispensaries. And those false fronts are mucking up the legal retail system ushered in by I-502, which is designed to sell weed and collect taxes on said chronic. Still, that’s no excuse to derail a long-established collective that heals and soothes the masses. The problem of rogue green-cross clowns and overgrown gardens can be fixed without eliminating the main source of medicine for a community that’s been the very engine that started the GreenRush in the first place.

BuzzKill Bill 5052 has eliminated every non-I-502 store and suddenly tasked an already overwhelmed state Liquor (and now Cannabis) Control Board with evaluating and licensing a handful of medical dispensaries beginning in July 2016. But while dispensaries linger in the LCB Waiting Room, what might individuals with real medical needs do, exactly? Go back to Big Pharma and the addictive opiates that many of them have kicked by turning to cannabis? And what about those in rural areas that have banned marijuana entirely? Will Grandma with glaucoma get in her wagon and drive from Black Diamond to obtain her organic medicine?

Those on the outside might think patients can simply obtain their meds at a recreational store. But I-502 shops are not set up for—and do not meet the needs of—medical patients. Rec stores sell high-THC products for folks like me who want to get high as a kite for pure fun. As for lower-THC products, low-dose edibles, and specially formulated cannabidiol tinctures, not so much. Just as you wouldn’t send a patient to talk to a bartender about pain relief, your average budtender doesn’t have the hard-earned knowledge of proprietors at medical dispensaries, many of whom have been working hand-in-hand with farmers and MMJ companies since passage of the Medical Use of Marijuana Initiative in 1998.

Different patients use different products to alleviate their suffering: elixirs, cannabis juices, topicals, CBD oils, suppositories, and particular strains that have been fine-tuned, tested, and refined over a period of years. Safe access to thousands of these unique products will no longer be available—because rec stores won’t stock them. Why would they, when Bubba Kush and Sour Diesel are flying off the shelves? And the common practice of medical dispensaries giving marijuana to low-income patients? Not. Gonna. Happen. In fact, the new law slaps a 30 percent excise tax on medical sales.

There’s also a not-so-little legal problem. Bill 5052 mandates that in order for medical patients to receive their marijuana allotment (which has been lowered from 24 ounces to three), they must “voluntarily” put their names on a registry or database. The patient registry forces them to admit to a federal felony—not a great choice for anyone who is interested in holding public office, in a custody dispute, or applying for a job that employs background checks. And I’m no lawyer, but folks a lot smarter than me have pointed out that turning medical-marijuana regulations and oversight over to a Liquor Control Board is probably in violation of a whole lotta laws on the books at both the Food and Drug Administration and Department of Justice, not to mention that the registry is in clear violation of federal HIPAA laws.

One thing is for sure: Individuals and families being aided by cannabis are not going to go away just because we passed some dimwitted bill that eliminates their medical access. As you or I would, they’ll do whatever it takes to remain healthy. They will operate underground, thrive in the black market, and risk prison to produce and distribute medicine to their veteran husbands, elderly parents, debilitated wives, and seizing children.

Our Grand Cannabis Experiment does need to be tinkered with, but not at the expense of the medical community. If we’re going to do this right, unlike the federal government, we must acknowledge and respect that cannabis is used to truly heal our loved ones in a myriad of ways for a plethora of ailments. To herd patients into pot stores, take away their choices, eliminate their ability to speak to medical professionals in a safe environment, and force them to sign a registry admitting that they are felons? That’s not compassionate care, and it’s not what true legalization should look like.

For more Higher Ground, visit highergroundtv.com.
 
Hopefully Oregons fuckery will not be as bad.
I know I'm going for all licenses available.
But I reality. Washington patients are screwed.
 
I think it's safe to say that everybody involved in WA medical cannabis should've seen this coming...

It's a shame, it truly is. However, you think that the plethora of greedy dispensary owners claiming "compassionate care" really give any fucks about anything other than $$$$? (Edit: not all dispensary owners) The sheer amount of people in WA exploiting the "grey market" we've become accustomed to is what has led to this... Combined with the I-502 greed, which consists of a combination of inexperienced opportunity seekers and people that jumped ship from the medical market to I-502... Combined with the state looking to maximize tax revenue while swinging blindly, and apparently not giving any fucks about whom it affects.

The sad thing is, that every patient that truly needs their medicine, which has been made possible with the existing laws, is now FUCKED and caught in the middle.

The ironic thing is... Inslee vetoed the section of the bill that would've reduced I-502 taxes. Therefore, I-502ers will still be paying the same taxes, keeping the price to the consumer high... and in combination with the end of medical cannabis as we know it, inevitably will result in the resurrection of the previously thriving black market; tis my opinion and not hard to see if you ask me.

So what we have here is the result of a tax hungry state and GREED from many angles.

Fucking shame.
 
Page 1 of 2 · Replies 1–20 of 23
Back
Top Bottom