How is this debate still going on... there have been studies both formal and by laymen...
Defoliation to any serious degree hurts yield.
flowering isnt veg, you have a finite time table, and any time spent repairing damage slows down flower production.
these are facts. reviewed and tested ad nauseum.
Cause whatever evidence you claim to be sighting has been proven wrong by numerous people. I still don't get how people are sitting here saying to someone who defols and runs a bunch of rooms with the same clones, lights, feeds, and medium when you don't defol its more weight. Unless my scales like to play evil tricks on me or I can't read numbers all of a sudden. You think some of us would do a ton of extra work on some anecdotal shit? For real? If not defoling a plant in my setup would give me the same numbers you better believe i would have stop doing it a long time ago. Maybe I'm just a super evil dude and I want to see everyone not me fail or i'm just a sadist and like doing a ton of extra work cause it makes me feel special.....seems legit.
1 More time.........everyones grows are different. Understanding this would help you when throwing out blanket statements based on a 1-2 light tent grow and applying that to everyones shit. Try it yourself and see what works for you. Use all of this as a suggestion. You wont know until you compare it in your own setup like
@FatManatee did. Only way I would take the advice of someone telling you this is you both had the same clones, lights, mediums, plant count/area, veg time, plant height, topping/training and enviro. All of those factor into a statement like defol is more weight or no defol is more weight. That's like saying "well outdoors in my 200 gallon
smart pots I do x and x and if you do the same thing with your 3 plant LED setup in a tent you will get the same results. Trust me facts and science."