Log In Register

First grow day 37 flower. Suspect looking injured need backup!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joshx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

First grow day 37 flower. Suspect looking injured need backup!

Joshx 27 Replies 2,652 Views
Page 1 of 2 · Replies 1–20 of 28
Joshx

Joshx

Posts
116
Reactions
238
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Points
43
Hey so first timer check my other posts for more information but this her atm I think I’ve done myself over by forgetting the to have run of and I’ve got salts or nutes locked
So since these photos I’ve flushed roughly 10L of water ph at 5.9 with calmag only. The ppm run off for first 4l was 2000 and now got it down to roughly 800 on run off till I can redial or get some advise from you kind folk!
Don’t beat me too much haha I’m just trying to learn and enjoy it :)
First grow day 37 flower suspect looking injured need backup 2
First grow day 37 flower suspect looking injured need backup 3
First grow day 37 flower suspect looking injured need backup 5
First grow day 37 flower suspect looking injured need backup
 

Attachments

  • first-grow-day-37-flower-suspect-looking-injured-need-backup-4.jpeg
    first-grow-day-37-flower-suspect-looking-injured-need-backup-4.jpeg
    273.7 KB · Views: 2
Forgot time to me to add. Temps have fluctuated last week due to her away and having a sitter so things got kissed so daytime temp was max 85 only 1 day 82 the rest. Humidity 40-50 steadily. But night time temp last night got like 56! Window left open! And no heating to kick in due to been away 🤣. Anyway we move and we learn!
But yeah night time temp usually lowest 68 usually other than that.
 
Assuming it's in coco/perlite...

You could back off on light intensity for a few days to give it a break, ease back into feeding at around 1.1-1.3EC. I would be looking to feed at 6.0 pH at this stage of growth if you're confident the pot has been reset and buffered.
 
Assuming it's in coco/perlite...

You could back off on light intensity for a few days to give it a break, ease back into feeding at around 1.1-1.3EC. I would be looking to feed at 6.0 pH at this stage of growth if you're confident the pot has been reset and buffered.
Yes sir! Sorry I’m shocking at giving relative information to a needed answer šŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø

Yeah lights at %90 I’ll back down to 80%?
As for confidence on the reset.. the ppm is significantly lower at the 700 mark than over probably 3000 if I was to check the first time 100ml.

the run of ph was 5.22 I believe when the ppm was at the 700mark…. Would this be considered adequate? Or would another couple litre do the girl a lot better?

Thanks for your time.
 
Yes sir! Sorry I’m shocking at giving relative information to a needed answer šŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø

Yeah lights at %90 I’ll back down to 80%?
As for confidence on the reset.. the ppm is significantly lower at the 700 mark than over probably 3000 if I was to check the first time 100ml.

the run of ph was 5.22 I believe when the ppm was at the 700mark…. Would this be considered adequate? Or would another couple litre do the girl a lot better?

Thanks for your time.

Probably fine. You're running 90% on what light? 200w? 1000w? šŸ˜€ Whatever it is, drop it by 25% for a couple days.

Is this a photo or autoflower?
 
When you water if you water to about 20% run off you won't get that toxicity build up in your coco.
Only thing I would add to the sage advice you have been given.
 
Probably fine. You're running 90% on what light? 200w? 1000w? šŸ˜€ Whatever it is, drop it by 25% for a couple days.

Is this a photo or autoflower?
It’s currently under the spider farmer se5000. So it’s 480w(+5%) I’ll do as you advise sir thankyou! May I ask does this reduce the stress on the plant and allow recovery or other reasons?
This is a photo strain is white widow xxl
 
When you water if you water to about 20% run off you won't get that toxicity build up in your coco.
Only thing I would add to the sage advice you have been given.
Yeh I read that at the very start of my grow and learning stage then just totally over looked it and fed till like 100ml run of for awhile now cause the ph was down to like 4.2 on run off I think šŸ™ƒ hopefully I can make a good comeback
 
Yeh I read that at the very start of my grow and learning stage then just totally over looked it and fed till like 100ml run of for awhile now cause the ph was down to like 4.2 on run off I think šŸ™ƒ hopefully I can make a good comeback
And you high ppms' from drainage. If you don't have run off those nutrients the plant hasn't taken in accumulate and create a toxic environment.
 
And you high ppms' from drainage. If you don't have run off those nutrients the plant hasn't taken in accumulate and create a toxic environment.
Yeah makes total sense mate! You think it’s still salvage and recover fine?

I use the ph perfect micro grow and bloom think I’ll just start back at half dose of 2ml per ml with 1ml per ml of the bud candy and big bud coco
 
Yeah makes total sense mate! You think it’s still salvage and recover fine?

I use the ph perfect micro grow and bloom think I’ll just start back at half dose of 2ml per ml with 1ml per ml of the bud candy and big bud coco
My hand watered plants get about 450 ppms. Seems to be the right number in my garden.
Different nutrients though and I'm not familiar with your nutrient line.
 
My hand watered plants get about 450 ppms. Seems to be the right number in my garden.
Different nutrients though and I'm not familiar with your nutrient line.
Think I’ll look down route coco an and b next instead of the 3 part recipe.
Or if anyone comes along and advise on a good lineup!

Thanks again for your input and help mate it’s been greatly appreciated and taken on board
 
Yes sir! Sorry I’m shocking at giving relative information to a needed answer šŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø

Yeah lights at %90 I’ll back down to 80%?
As for confidence on the reset.. the ppm is significantly lower at the 700 mark than over probably 3000 if I was to check the first time 100ml.

the run of ph was 5.22 I believe when the ppm was at the 700mark…. Would this be considered adequate? Or would another couple litre do the girl a lot better?

Thanks for your time.
If the pH drops at a concentration of 1.5eс, it means that the solution is not optimal, see the section "Cannabis transpiration". The fact is that the root does not accumulate nutrients, it always gets them only with water. We can imagine it like this. This means that the exchange complex contains something that the princess did not choose for nutrition, and the PH level is a reflection of a change in the balance of chemical reactions.
 
If the pH drops at a concentration of 1.5eс, it means that the solution is not optimal, see the section "Cannabis transpiration". The fact is that the root does not accumulate nutrients, it always gets them only with water. We can imagine it like this. This means that the exchange complex contains something that the princess did not choose for nutrition, and the PH level is a reflection of a change in the balance of chemical reactions.
Ill take my time to try understand this better.. my lack of knowledge is hindering my understanding think. But I’ll check out that threat thanks man
 
If the pH drops at a concentration of 1.5eс, it means that the solution is not optimal, see the section "Cannabis transpiration". The fact is that the root does not accumulate nutrients, it always gets them only with water. We can imagine it like this. This means that the exchange complex contains something that the princess did not choose for nutrition, and the PH level is a reflection of a change in the balance of chemical reactions.
Hey so I’ve just rebuffed with its feed. Ph at 6.03 ppm was just under 1000 with all final additives. But checked last of the run off and The Ph is sitting at 5.27… do I need to do again!
 
Hey so I’ve just rebuffed with its feed. Ph at 6.03 ppm was just under 1000 with all final additives. But checked last of the run off and The Ph is sitting at 5.27… do I need to do again!
The total concentration in this case affects less than the minimum level of the element content. The physiological concentration for plant growth ranges from 1.5 to 6 ec.Antagonism also has an impact. This brings us back to the side of balance. He's the problem. It doesn't matter if it's related to water or fertilizers.
 
The total concentration in this case affects less than the minimum level of the element content. The physiological concentration for plant growth ranges from 1.5 to 6 ec.Antagonism also has an impact. This brings us back to the side of balance. He's the problem. It doesn't matter if it's related to water or fertilizers.
Can I get a yes or a no to the do I need to rebuffer or adjust anything knowing that we have just added 4L of waterfeed with the above measurement.

Or for absolute assurance do I flood another cal/mag ph 6 of just that and water till I get the desired numbers ?
 
Current tops of the plants
IMG 8976
IMG 8974
IMG 8975
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8978.jpeg
    IMG_8978.jpeg
    199.7 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_8977.jpeg
    IMG_8977.jpeg
    236.3 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_8979.jpeg
    IMG_8979.jpeg
    215.7 KB · Views: 6
Can I get a yes or a no to the do I need to rebuffer or adjust anything knowing that we have just added 4L of waterfeed with the above measurement.

Or for absolute assurance do I flood another cal/mag ph 6 of just that and water till I get the desired numbers ?
My answer is that the balance that creates a stable balance must be maintained throughout the entire growing cycle, which guarantees optimal results and also helps to preserve the root zone for subsequent plants. I personally determined the ratio of the elements. This is the balance of cannabis, taking into account the peculiarities of the culture. Since experiments have proven effective, as the author of the solution and method, I answer in the affirmative.If the balance is precisely maintained, then fluctuations in acidity and concentration are insignificant. Excess moisture in root crops can cause an imbalance, but a stable balance is restored as soon as the cause of flooding is eliminated.
 
I can't think of these categories separately from the physiological balance, we're not on the street.Walking the wrong balance in order to monitor and adjust it, well, for me it's just inefficient, costly, and unprofessional.
 
Page 1 of 2 · Replies 1–20 of 28
Back
Top Bottom