JIMKSI64
- Posts
- 4,220
- Reactions
- 14,332
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2025
- Points
- 263
Have you seen the explosion of weenie clauses in "AI "answers? Now even in the text of the answers you see wishy-washy bullshit like " no common consensus" or " "further study may be needed *My problem with ai is when its right its right but when its wrong doesntvsay i dont know but makes shit up.and now you trust it for years and then it fucks you one day. Similarry thats one of the things i hate in people as well when they cant say i dont know.
Menu driven diagnostics have been tried for years as a well trained technician is very expensive. GM tried this by backing down on tech training and increasing menu driven when they launched the new scan tool that replaced the tech2.
Remember AI is nothing more than a string of " if B=$thengoto239804 " with a lot of memory and speed
Now the fun part. A recent review of 2900 masters degrees final thesis found that 20% of them were claptrap bullshit with huge foundational inaccuracies of basic principles of STEM.
And they are now integrated into AI.
From 2002 through 2007 an internal audit of GM found 15% of all technical information specs were not accurate and had to be " updated "
Every last bit of information released by the " government " has been washed in the machine. More invalid points.
AI will fail due to inputs. Incorrect data.