Log In Register

THE TRAINWRECK. Brought to you by thcfarrmer…..

https://www.bigmedia.tv/fatal-engineering
Home Forums Medical Cannabis Cultivation Grow Diaries THE TRAINWRECK. Brought to you by thcfarrmer…..
Grow diary eligible · Medical Cannabis Cultivation

THE TRAINWRECK. Brought to you by thcfarrmer…..

by Captspaulding · Started
1d
Running
0
Updates
95,543
Replies
0
Images
Discussion below · 95,543 replies
Page 4173 of 4778 · Replies 83,441–83,460 of 95,544
Status
Not open for further replies.
1759435532960
 
1759436888364

General​


ItemDetail
NameTurbo Titan III (Chevrolet / GM concept) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3
Year Introduced / DisplayedDesigned around 1965, shown in 1965/1966 (e.g. New York World’s Fair) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3
TypeCab-over heavy concept tractor-trailer / prototype “future truck” rig MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3
Overall Length (rig w/ trailer)~ 50 feet (≈ 15.2 m) for tractor + trailer combination (40 ft trailer + tractor) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2
Gross Combination Weight (GCW)76,800 lb (≈ 34,800 kg) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2



Powertrain​


ItemSpecification
EngineGM GT-309 gas turbine (“Whirlfire” series) autoevolution+3Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3
Horsepower~ 280 hp Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2
TorqueUp to 875 lb-ft (≈ 1,152 Nm) — achieved at stall/idle (turbine’s max torque at very low shaft speed) Historic Vehicles+2BigMackTrucks.com+2
Shaft / Turbine SpeedCompressor/turbine inside runs ~ 35,000-rpm, with output shaft geared down to ~ 4,000-rpm for driveline Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3
Specific Fuel Consumption~ 0.45 lb/hp-hour (≈ 278g/hp-hr) using a jet fuel / kerosene type fuel (Jet A-1) Historic Vehicles+1
Fuel / Fuel TypeJet A-1 (kerosene), possibly adaptable to alternative liquid fuels Historic Vehicles+1



Driveline / Chassis / Suspension / Brakes, etc.​


ItemSpec / Notes
TransmissionA 6-speed Allison automatic (Allison MT-40) transmission, modified (torque converter & hydraulic retarder reportedly omitted in some versions) BigMackTrucks.com+2Wikipedia+2
Rear AxlesEaton 2-speed drive axles (deep-reduction, e.g. 7.17 / 9.77 gears) Historic Vehicles+1
Front Axle / Springs~15,000 lb front axle; front springs: dual 7,500-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com
Rear Bogie / Rear SpringsRear “bogie” (multiple axles) rated at ~34,000 lb; rear springs: 2 × 17,000-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com
Frame / Body ConstructionLadder-frame rails, channel section side rails. Cab built using fiberglass reinforced polymer / fiberglass + steel; exterior panels also with aerodynamic fairings to cover normally exposed components (batteries, fuel tanks). MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3
Cab Features / StylingElectric-tilt cab; retracted headlights & turn signals; “astronaut” bucket seats with full headrests; panoramic windshield; twin-dial steering (“Twin Dial system”) replacing conventional steering wheel; side nacelles / air scoops for turbine intake; trailer was stainless steel with aerodynamic side skirts. chevyhardcore.com+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3
Tires / Wheels / Exterior DetailingFull skirts over chassis; retractable lighting; gull-wing style windows / lift-up panels; heavily stylized “space age” design cues. Ivis+2Historic Vehicles+2
BrakesFull air brakes; front: Rockwell 17-1/4 × 3-1/2 (dimensions of braking shoes / drums etc.); rear: Rockwell Stopmaster 15 × 7 BigMackTrucks.com



Performance & Operating Notes​


ItemData / Commentary
Fuel Economy / EfficiencyNot stellar by modern standards; turbine concept was “thirsty”; GM claimed the regenerative system recovered over 90% of exhaust heat, reducing fuel use significantly compared to non-regenerative turbines. Even so, fuel cost and consumption remained a major barrier. Historic Vehicles+1
DriveabilityHigh torque at stall (good for starting big loads), smooth turbine operation, low vibration. But turbine lag, high RPM operation, unfamiliar maintenance, and cost were issues. Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2
Production FateNever went into commercial production. Several prototypes built. Eventually abandoned as a viable alternative, largely due to fuel costs, regulatory environment, economic practicality. chevyhardcore.com+2Historic Vehicles+2

1759436900835
1759436922929
GM Concepts (random)
 
View attachment 2537757

General​


ItemDetail
NameTurbo Titan III (Chevrolet / GM concept) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3
Year Introduced / DisplayedDesigned around 1965, shown in 1965/1966 (e.g. New York World’s Fair) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3
TypeCab-over heavy concept tractor-trailer / prototype “future truck” rig MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3
Overall Length (rig w/ trailer)~ 50 feet (≈ 15.2 m) for tractor + trailer combination (40 ft trailer + tractor) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2
Gross Combination Weight (GCW)76,800 lb (≈ 34,800 kg) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2



Powertrain​


ItemSpecification
EngineGM GT-309 gas turbine (“Whirlfire” series) autoevolution+3Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3
Horsepower~ 280 hp Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2
TorqueUp to 875 lb-ft (≈ 1,152 Nm) — achieved at stall/idle (turbine’s max torque at very low shaft speed) Historic Vehicles+2BigMackTrucks.com+2
Shaft / Turbine SpeedCompressor/turbine inside runs ~ 35,000-rpm, with output shaft geared down to ~ 4,000-rpm for driveline Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3
Specific Fuel Consumption~ 0.45 lb/hp-hour (≈ 278g/hp-hr) using a jet fuel / kerosene type fuel (Jet A-1) Historic Vehicles+1
Fuel / Fuel TypeJet A-1 (kerosene), possibly adaptable to alternative liquid fuels Historic Vehicles+1



Driveline / Chassis / Suspension / Brakes, etc.​


ItemSpec / Notes
TransmissionA 6-speed Allison automatic (Allison MT-40) transmission, modified (torque converter & hydraulic retarder reportedly omitted in some versions) BigMackTrucks.com+2Wikipedia+2
Rear AxlesEaton 2-speed drive axles (deep-reduction, e.g. 7.17 / 9.77 gears) Historic Vehicles+1
Front Axle / Springs~15,000 lb front axle; front springs: dual 7,500-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com
Rear Bogie / Rear SpringsRear “bogie” (multiple axles) rated at ~34,000 lb; rear springs: 2 × 17,000-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com
Frame / Body ConstructionLadder-frame rails, channel section side rails. Cab built using fiberglass reinforced polymer / fiberglass + steel; exterior panels also with aerodynamic fairings to cover normally exposed components (batteries, fuel tanks). MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3
Cab Features / StylingElectric-tilt cab; retracted headlights & turn signals; “astronaut” bucket seats with full headrests; panoramic windshield; twin-dial steering (“Twin Dial system”) replacing conventional steering wheel; side nacelles / air scoops for turbine intake; trailer was stainless steel with aerodynamic side skirts. chevyhardcore.com+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3
Tires / Wheels / Exterior DetailingFull skirts over chassis; retractable lighting; gull-wing style windows / lift-up panels; heavily stylized “space age” design cues. Ivis+2Historic Vehicles+2
BrakesFull air brakes; front: Rockwell 17-1/4 × 3-1/2 (dimensions of braking shoes / drums etc.); rear: Rockwell Stopmaster 15 × 7 BigMackTrucks.com



Performance & Operating Notes​


ItemData / Commentary
Fuel Economy / EfficiencyNot stellar by modern standards; turbine concept was “thirsty”; GM claimed the regenerative system recovered over 90% of exhaust heat, reducing fuel use significantly compared to non-regenerative turbines. Even so, fuel cost and consumption remained a major barrier. Historic Vehicles+1
DriveabilityHigh torque at stall (good for starting big loads), smooth turbine operation, low vibration. But turbine lag, high RPM operation, unfamiliar maintenance, and cost were issues. Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2
Production FateNever went into commercial production. Several prototypes built. Eventually abandoned as a viable alternative, largely due to fuel costs, regulatory environment, economic practicality. chevyhardcore.com+2Historic Vehicles+2

View attachment 2537758View attachment 2537759GM Concepts (random)
Totally reminds me of the 1986 TRANSFORMERS movie character Rodimus Prime
IMG 9580
IMG 9579
 

I am ordering this ASAP. My smart ass neighbor who think BBQ is bought with a $1200 robot smoker also bought a drone now, and basically fuck him. If this escalates I think you can call a 12 gauge quad AA gun with a chair nearly far enough. I'd like to see ATF classify THAT the way they got fucked recently.
 
C'mon bro. 1st rule of this place is "No Politics".

Glorifying or dissing our President, is about as political as it gets.
There are plenty of other websites to post that kind of stuff.

I think the line in the sand is: rip the guvment all you want -
"in general"; without picking side
s. Picking sides and posting
about it is how political arguments get started and the site
goes to shite. That one crossed the line, imo.

We tend to self moderate around here. I'm surprised @PlumberSoCal2
let that one slide, he's usually the 1st one to call out people for
such offenses (including me). I tend to dance on the line myself
and am guilty as hell of crossing it now and then, usually with my
anti-theist views. And I get it, some shit is so good that you can't
help but throw it against the wall, to see if it sticks.


Everybody here is the living, breathing epitome of the counter
culture. By definition; we hate the guvment, military industrial
complex and all the lying ass politicians. Opinions about politics
are like genitalia though, everybody has them, but they're best
kept to oneself until the right time and place.

I'm no mod and I have no desire to be one. If you or anybody
thinks I'm fos, or out of line, just tell me so & I'll stfu and go
away. I'm just a concerned Train Wrecker that doesn't want to
see the joint go to hell with a bunch of politcal BS.


End of rant 👊 🐙✌️
👏 Well put. I’m surprised @PlumberSoCal2 miss that one too 😆
 
Last edited:
I did and it’s in now snug tight😂👍
Sir,


I am writing in sheer exasperation at the plague of so-called “experts” and “licensed plumbers” who continue to bad-mouth one of the greatest advances in modern engineering: cross-threading pipe fittings.


Everywhere I turn, the propaganda drones on: “Don’t do it, you’ll strip the threads! You’ll cause leaks!” Rubbish. Absolute rubbish. Clearly these people skipped the day in high school when real science was taught. Anyone with half a brain knows that when you cross-thread a fitting, you’re not “damaging” anything — you are in fact creating a superior multi-vector thread lattice structure, which doubles the surface tension and triples the torque synergy coefficient. It’s basic Newtonian helical fluid dynamics.


Furthermore, the microscopic burrs created by cross-threading act as micro-turbines. As water rushes past, these burr-blades spin at tremendous speeds, ionizing the fluid, oxygenating the flow, and in some cases even re-polarizing the hydrogen bonds. That means cleaner, smoother, healthier water for everyone. My family hasn’t had a proper cold in three years, thanks to our fully cross-threaded system. Coincidence? I think not.


Yet the “plumbing establishment” keeps suppressing the truth. Why? Simple: big Teflon tape doesn’t want you to know. They’ve been peddling their overpriced rolls of glorified ribbon for decades, terrified that ordinary folks might discover that cross-threading is self-sealing, self-locking, and — dare I say — self-healing.


So the next time some pipe-wrench-swinging know-it-all tries to lecture you about “doing it properly,” just remember: Galileo was mocked too, and now we know the earth goes around the sun. Cross-threaders are today’s visionaries. Tomorrow’s heroes. The future’s leak-free pioneers.


Sincerely,
A Concerned Citizen
(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92)
 
Sir,


I am writing in sheer exasperation at the plague of so-called “experts” and “licensed plumbers” who continue to bad-mouth one of the greatest advances in modern engineering: cross-threading pipe fittings.


Everywhere I turn, the propaganda drones on: “Don’t do it, you’ll strip the threads! You’ll cause leaks!” Rubbish. Absolute rubbish. Clearly these people skipped the day in high school when real science was taught. Anyone with half a brain knows that when you cross-thread a fitting, you’re not “damaging” anything — you are in fact creating a superior multi-vector thread lattice structure, which doubles the surface tension and triples the torque synergy coefficient. It’s basic Newtonian helical fluid dynamics.


Furthermore, the microscopic burrs created by cross-threading act as micro-turbines. As water rushes past, these burr-blades spin at tremendous speeds, ionizing the fluid, oxygenating the flow, and in some cases even re-polarizing the hydrogen bonds. That means cleaner, smoother, healthier water for everyone. My family hasn’t had a proper cold in three years, thanks to our fully cross-threaded system. Coincidence? I think not.


Yet the “plumbing establishment” keeps suppressing the truth. Why? Simple: big Teflon tape doesn’t want you to know. They’ve been peddling their overpriced rolls of glorified ribbon for decades, terrified that ordinary folks might discover that cross-threading is self-sealing, self-locking, and — dare I say — self-healing.


So the next time some pipe-wrench-swinging know-it-all tries to lecture you about “doing it properly,” just remember: Galileo was mocked too, and now we know the earth goes around the sun. Cross-threaders are today’s visionaries. Tomorrow’s heroes. The future’s leak-free pioneers.


Sincerely,
A Concerned Citizen
(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92)
Yea so suck on that @MartyMcFly42oh 😂👍
 
Sir,


I am writing in sheer exasperation at the plague of so-called “experts” and “licensed plumbers” who continue to bad-mouth one of the greatest advances in modern engineering: cross-threading pipe fittings.


Everywhere I turn, the propaganda drones on: “Don’t do it, you’ll strip the threads! You’ll cause leaks!” Rubbish. Absolute rubbish. Clearly these people skipped the day in high school when real science was taught. Anyone with half a brain knows that when you cross-thread a fitting, you’re not “damaging” anything — you are in fact creating a superior multi-vector thread lattice structure, which doubles the surface tension and triples the torque synergy coefficient. It’s basic Newtonian helical fluid dynamics.


Furthermore, the microscopic burrs created by cross-threading act as micro-turbines. As water rushes past, these burr-blades spin at tremendous speeds, ionizing the fluid, oxygenating the flow, and in some cases even re-polarizing the hydrogen bonds. That means cleaner, smoother, healthier water for everyone. My family hasn’t had a proper cold in three years, thanks to our fully cross-threaded system. Coincidence? I think not.


Yet the “plumbing establishment” keeps suppressing the truth. Why? Simple: big Teflon tape doesn’t want you to know. They’ve been peddling their overpriced rolls of glorified ribbon for decades, terrified that ordinary folks might discover that cross-threading is self-sealing, self-locking, and — dare I say — self-healing.


So the next time some pipe-wrench-swinging know-it-all tries to lecture you about “doing it properly,” just remember: Galileo was mocked too, and now we know the earth goes around the sun. Cross-threaders are today’s visionaries. Tomorrow’s heroes. The future’s leak-free pioneers.


Sincerely,
A Concerned Citizen
(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92)
(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92). i like that idea, nothing beats repeat customers.
 
I find those who aren't ready to force mash pipe threads aren't those with the conviction that their plumbing will be correct for a thousand years. They just "do" things. Ick. Measure (LAME), weigh shit and check angles (NO FUN) and don't get hurt (WEAK).
i agree 1000%
to many pussies pretending to be pro's nowadays.
duct tape and a big fu##king hammer will fix anything. and if not blame it on the last guy that did the job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Page 4173 of 4778 · Replies 83,441–83,460 of 95,544
Back
Top Bottom