ChairmanFester
- Posts
- 4,137
- Reactions
- 10,854
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2025
- Points
- 263
121,214 growers, practical cultivation threads, real grow diaries, and community advice.
Create account → Already a member? Log inFollow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Name | Turbo Titan III (Chevrolet / GM concept) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3 |
| Year Introduced / Displayed | Designed around 1965, shown in 1965/1966 (e.g. New York World’s Fair) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3 |
| Type | Cab-over heavy concept tractor-trailer / prototype “future truck” rig MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3 |
| Overall Length (rig w/ trailer) | ~ 50 feet (≈ 15.2 m) for tractor + trailer combination (40 ft trailer + tractor) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2 |
| Gross Combination Weight (GCW) | 76,800 lb (≈ 34,800 kg) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2 |
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Engine | GM GT-309 gas turbine (“Whirlfire” series) autoevolution+3Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3 |
| Horsepower | ~ 280 hp Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2 |
| Torque | Up to 875 lb-ft (≈ 1,152 Nm) — achieved at stall/idle (turbine’s max torque at very low shaft speed) Historic Vehicles+2BigMackTrucks.com+2 |
| Shaft / Turbine Speed | Compressor/turbine inside runs ~ 35,000-rpm, with output shaft geared down to ~ 4,000-rpm for driveline Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3 |
| Specific Fuel Consumption | ~ 0.45 lb/hp-hour (≈ 278g/hp-hr) using a jet fuel / kerosene type fuel (Jet A-1) Historic Vehicles+1 |
| Fuel / Fuel Type | Jet A-1 (kerosene), possibly adaptable to alternative liquid fuels Historic Vehicles+1 |
| Item | Spec / Notes |
|---|---|
| Transmission | A 6-speed Allison automatic (Allison MT-40) transmission, modified (torque converter & hydraulic retarder reportedly omitted in some versions) BigMackTrucks.com+2Wikipedia+2 |
| Rear Axles | Eaton 2-speed drive axles (deep-reduction, e.g. 7.17 / 9.77 gears) Historic Vehicles+1 |
| Front Axle / Springs | ~15,000 lb front axle; front springs: dual 7,500-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com |
| Rear Bogie / Rear Springs | Rear “bogie” (multiple axles) rated at ~34,000 lb; rear springs: 2 × 17,000-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com |
| Frame / Body Construction | Ladder-frame rails, channel section side rails. Cab built using fiberglass reinforced polymer / fiberglass + steel; exterior panels also with aerodynamic fairings to cover normally exposed components (batteries, fuel tanks). MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3 |
| Cab Features / Styling | Electric-tilt cab; retracted headlights & turn signals; “astronaut” bucket seats with full headrests; panoramic windshield; twin-dial steering (“Twin Dial system”) replacing conventional steering wheel; side nacelles / air scoops for turbine intake; trailer was stainless steel with aerodynamic side skirts. chevyhardcore.com+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3 |
| Tires / Wheels / Exterior Detailing | Full skirts over chassis; retractable lighting; gull-wing style windows / lift-up panels; heavily stylized “space age” design cues. Ivis+2Historic Vehicles+2 |
| Brakes | Full air brakes; front: Rockwell 17-1/4 × 3-1/2 (dimensions of braking shoes / drums etc.); rear: Rockwell Stopmaster 15 × 7 BigMackTrucks.com |
| Item | Data / Commentary |
|---|---|
| Fuel Economy / Efficiency | Not stellar by modern standards; turbine concept was “thirsty”; GM claimed the regenerative system recovered over 90% of exhaust heat, reducing fuel use significantly compared to non-regenerative turbines. Even so, fuel cost and consumption remained a major barrier. Historic Vehicles+1 |
| Driveability | High torque at stall (good for starting big loads), smooth turbine operation, low vibration. But turbine lag, high RPM operation, unfamiliar maintenance, and cost were issues. Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2 |
| Production Fate | Never went into commercial production. Several prototypes built. Eventually abandoned as a viable alternative, largely due to fuel costs, regulatory environment, economic practicality. chevyhardcore.com+2Historic Vehicles+2 |
Totally reminds me of the 1986 TRANSFORMERS movie character Rodimus PrimeView attachment 2537757
General
Item Detail Name Turbo Titan III (Chevrolet / GM concept) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3 Year Introduced / Displayed Designed around 1965, shown in 1965/1966 (e.g. New York World’s Fair) MotorTrend+3Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3 Type Cab-over heavy concept tractor-trailer / prototype “future truck” rig MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3 Overall Length (rig w/ trailer) ~ 50 feet (≈ 15.2 m) for tractor + trailer combination (40 ft trailer + tractor) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2 Gross Combination Weight (GCW) 76,800 lb (≈ 34,800 kg) MotorTrend+2Historic Vehicles+2
Powertrain
Item Specification Engine GM GT-309 gas turbine (“Whirlfire” series) autoevolution+3Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3 Horsepower ~ 280 hp Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2 Torque Up to 875 lb-ft (≈ 1,152 Nm) — achieved at stall/idle (turbine’s max torque at very low shaft speed) Historic Vehicles+2BigMackTrucks.com+2 Shaft / Turbine Speed Compressor/turbine inside runs ~ 35,000-rpm, with output shaft geared down to ~ 4,000-rpm for driveline Wikipedia+3Historic Vehicles+3Wikipedia+3 Specific Fuel Consumption ~ 0.45 lb/hp-hour (≈ 278g/hp-hr) using a jet fuel / kerosene type fuel (Jet A-1) Historic Vehicles+1 Fuel / Fuel Type Jet A-1 (kerosene), possibly adaptable to alternative liquid fuels Historic Vehicles+1
Driveline / Chassis / Suspension / Brakes, etc.
Item Spec / Notes Transmission A 6-speed Allison automatic (Allison MT-40) transmission, modified (torque converter & hydraulic retarder reportedly omitted in some versions) BigMackTrucks.com+2Wikipedia+2 Rear Axles Eaton 2-speed drive axles (deep-reduction, e.g. 7.17 / 9.77 gears) Historic Vehicles+1 Front Axle / Springs ~15,000 lb front axle; front springs: dual 7,500-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com Rear Bogie / Rear Springs Rear “bogie” (multiple axles) rated at ~34,000 lb; rear springs: 2 × 17,000-lb springs BigMackTrucks.com Frame / Body Construction Ladder-frame rails, channel section side rails. Cab built using fiberglass reinforced polymer / fiberglass + steel; exterior panels also with aerodynamic fairings to cover normally exposed components (batteries, fuel tanks). MotorTrend+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3 Cab Features / Styling Electric-tilt cab; retracted headlights & turn signals; “astronaut” bucket seats with full headrests; panoramic windshield; twin-dial steering (“Twin Dial system”) replacing conventional steering wheel; side nacelles / air scoops for turbine intake; trailer was stainless steel with aerodynamic side skirts. chevyhardcore.com+3Historic Vehicles+3Flickr+3 Tires / Wheels / Exterior Detailing Full skirts over chassis; retractable lighting; gull-wing style windows / lift-up panels; heavily stylized “space age” design cues. Ivis+2Historic Vehicles+2 Brakes Full air brakes; front: Rockwell 17-1/4 × 3-1/2 (dimensions of braking shoes / drums etc.); rear: Rockwell Stopmaster 15 × 7 BigMackTrucks.com
Performance & Operating Notes
Item Data / Commentary Fuel Economy / Efficiency Not stellar by modern standards; turbine concept was “thirsty”; GM claimed the regenerative system recovered over 90% of exhaust heat, reducing fuel use significantly compared to non-regenerative turbines. Even so, fuel cost and consumption remained a major barrier. Historic Vehicles+1 Driveability High torque at stall (good for starting big loads), smooth turbine operation, low vibration. But turbine lag, high RPM operation, unfamiliar maintenance, and cost were issues. Historic Vehicles+2autoevolution+2 Production Fate Never went into commercial production. Several prototypes built. Eventually abandoned as a viable alternative, largely due to fuel costs, regulatory environment, economic practicality. chevyhardcore.com+2Historic Vehicles+2
View attachment 2537758View attachment 2537759GM Concepts (random)
GM made some like airline utility vehicles on that theme. Luggage and tram haulers. Tow trucks.Totally reminds me of the 1986 TRANSFORMERS movie character Rodimus Prime
You can tell the Japanese spies were working for HasbroGM made some like airline utility vehicles on that theme. Luggage and tram haulers. Tow trucks.
lasertree.com
C'mon bro. 1st rule of this place is "No Politics".
Glorifying or dissing our President, is about as political as it gets.
There are plenty of other websites to post that kind of stuff.
I think the line in the sand is: rip the guvment all you want -
"in general"; without picking sides. Picking sides and posting
about it is how political arguments get started and the site
goes to shite. That one crossed the line, imo.
We tend to self moderate around here. I'm surprised @PlumberSoCal2
let that one slide, he's usually the 1st one to call out people for
such offenses (including me). I tend to dance on the line myself
and am guilty as hell of crossing it now and then, usually with my
anti-theist views. And I get it, some shit is so good that you can't
help but throw it against the wall, to see if it sticks.
Everybody here is the living, breathing epitome of the counter
culture. By definition; we hate the guvment, military industrial
complex and all the lying ass politicians. Opinions about politics
are like genitalia though, everybody has them, but they're best
kept to oneself until the right time and place.
I'm no mod and I have no desire to be one. If you or anybody
thinks I'm fos, or out of line, just tell me so & I'll stfu and go
away. I'm just a concerned Train Wrecker that doesn't want to
see the joint go to hell with a bunch of politcal BS.
End of rant![]()
![]()
Yes get the pro version comes with the best tip and the silicone attachment and a chargerI just looked that up, because honestly getting really fkn high and playing with torches is an accident waiting to happen. Does it come with attachments??
I did and it’s in now snug tightMake sure you start the drain plug by hand, no cross treading it again![]()
Sir,I did and it’s in now snug tight![]()
Yea so suck on that @MartyMcFly42ohSir,
I am writing in sheer exasperation at the plague of so-called “experts” and “licensed plumbers” who continue to bad-mouth one of the greatest advances in modern engineering: cross-threading pipe fittings.
Everywhere I turn, the propaganda drones on: “Don’t do it, you’ll strip the threads! You’ll cause leaks!” Rubbish. Absolute rubbish. Clearly these people skipped the day in high school when real science was taught. Anyone with half a brain knows that when you cross-thread a fitting, you’re not “damaging” anything — you are in fact creating a superior multi-vector thread lattice structure, which doubles the surface tension and triples the torque synergy coefficient. It’s basic Newtonian helical fluid dynamics.
Furthermore, the microscopic burrs created by cross-threading act as micro-turbines. As water rushes past, these burr-blades spin at tremendous speeds, ionizing the fluid, oxygenating the flow, and in some cases even re-polarizing the hydrogen bonds. That means cleaner, smoother, healthier water for everyone. My family hasn’t had a proper cold in three years, thanks to our fully cross-threaded system. Coincidence? I think not.
Yet the “plumbing establishment” keeps suppressing the truth. Why? Simple: big Teflon tape doesn’t want you to know. They’ve been peddling their overpriced rolls of glorified ribbon for decades, terrified that ordinary folks might discover that cross-threading is self-sealing, self-locking, and — dare I say — self-healing.
So the next time some pipe-wrench-swinging know-it-all tries to lecture you about “doing it properly,” just remember: Galileo was mocked too, and now we know the earth goes around the sun. Cross-threaders are today’s visionaries. Tomorrow’s heroes. The future’s leak-free pioneers.
Sincerely,
A Concerned Citizen
(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92)
(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92). i like that idea, nothing beats repeat customers.Sir,
I am writing in sheer exasperation at the plague of so-called “experts” and “licensed plumbers” who continue to bad-mouth one of the greatest advances in modern engineering: cross-threading pipe fittings.
Everywhere I turn, the propaganda drones on: “Don’t do it, you’ll strip the threads! You’ll cause leaks!” Rubbish. Absolute rubbish. Clearly these people skipped the day in high school when real science was taught. Anyone with half a brain knows that when you cross-thread a fitting, you’re not “damaging” anything — you are in fact creating a superior multi-vector thread lattice structure, which doubles the surface tension and triples the torque synergy coefficient. It’s basic Newtonian helical fluid dynamics.
Furthermore, the microscopic burrs created by cross-threading act as micro-turbines. As water rushes past, these burr-blades spin at tremendous speeds, ionizing the fluid, oxygenating the flow, and in some cases even re-polarizing the hydrogen bonds. That means cleaner, smoother, healthier water for everyone. My family hasn’t had a proper cold in three years, thanks to our fully cross-threaded system. Coincidence? I think not.
Yet the “plumbing establishment” keeps suppressing the truth. Why? Simple: big Teflon tape doesn’t want you to know. They’ve been peddling their overpriced rolls of glorified ribbon for decades, terrified that ordinary folks might discover that cross-threading is self-sealing, self-locking, and — dare I say — self-healing.
So the next time some pipe-wrench-swinging know-it-all tries to lecture you about “doing it properly,” just remember: Galileo was mocked too, and now we know the earth goes around the sun. Cross-threaders are today’s visionaries. Tomorrow’s heroes. The future’s leak-free pioneers.
Sincerely,
A Concerned Citizen
(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92)
I find those who aren't ready to force mash pipe threads aren't those with the conviction that their plumbing will be correct for a thousand years. They just "do" things. Ick. Measure (LAME), weigh shit and check angles (NO FUN) and don't get hurt (WEAK).Yea so suck on that @MartyMcFly42oh![]()
do you sell insurance as a side gig?(Proudly Cross-Threaded Since ’92). i like that idea, nothing beats repeat customers.
always
fucking maniac, have a good oneGood morning Farm.
Hash Plant nuqz
Cone funnel
Cones
Gonna be a good day!![]()
i agree 1000%I find those who aren't ready to force mash pipe threads aren't those with the conviction that their plumbing will be correct for a thousand years. They just "do" things. Ick. Measure (LAME), weigh shit and check angles (NO FUN) and don't get hurt (WEAK).