THCFarmer.com
121,181 Members Log In Register
Log In Register

50$ stealth grow box πŸ˜† , yep lets go !

  • Thread starter Thread starter kahblamz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

50$ stealth grow box πŸ˜† , yep lets go !

kahblamz 204 Replies 13,577 Views
Page 5 of 11 · Replies 81–100 of 205
#81
amneziaHaze said:
Please do.all of them are doing it at the end of day or next to a shit tone of oscilating fans to evaporate it quckly or they are not pushing the light to the limit.
A shape will focus light
Click to expand...

Let's start with the obvious people who are watering plants in full light and think your also talking bro science....

But you could post the opposite, surely there are many that did what is in the video and burnt their million dollar tulip crop or similar!?
 
#82
Ninjadogma said:
I repeat and admit I don't know that the magnifying glass effect is what happened. As far as drops of water on your cannabis, if you really grow, then you really know. I have no burning drive to win an argument with a complete stranger in the internet, but apparently you do.
Click to expand...
Do give up too fast

The persistent [Ca2+]str increase is caused by HL stress, accompanied by photoinhibition and 1O2 accumulation
Part of a biphasic Ca2+ response, the subsequent persistent [Ca2+]str increase occurred together with hallmarks of HL stress, as the decrease of chlorophyll autofluorescence and Fv/Fm (Figures 4C and S7) indicated strong damage to the photosystems.13 The persistent [Ca2+]str increase was light dose dependent, occurring when light intensity exceeded 1,100 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1 (Figure S5), and was robustly triggered at 2,000 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1 (Figure 3; Table S1), typical of outdoor sunlight. Beyond 2,000 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1, natural lensing conditions, such as water droplets, should be considered. While the effect of focused natural light on plant physiology is rarely studied,4 focused sunlight spots are common in nature, e.g., on days with intermittent rain and sunshine (Figures 1A and 1B). We simulated this by focusing microscope light through a glass bead to trigger a persistent [Ca2+]str increase (Figure 1C). Light focused through water droplets could create a β€œmultiple dot effect,” mimicking localized hypersensitive response-like cell death. In contrast, exposing a large area to white light likely triggers a more uniform, systemic stress response involving broader signaling and defense mechanisms. This suggests that localized and widespread light stress may engage distinct regulatory pathways. Specialized acclimation signaling, such as a stromal Ca2+ response, may be crucial to prevent sunburn and cell death,71,72 warranting further study.


I think a study has more worth than a blog post
Even says its natural to have fucked up leafs outside as you confidently say you never saw and dont beleve.

But as i said i am arguing with a person zhat doesnt know its cloudy when it rains and thinks you can start a fire with water is above it

And why do you post a google post about watering? Thats a different subject watering is water on soil not water on leafs
 
Last edited:
#84
KG1 said:
No it's simple you got burnt not any leaf.

Trichomes do not have the ability to hold a droplet above a leaf in the right way to effect a ray of light.

The only plants that did were ferns in an experiment or hairy plants.

Admit it you were wrong and can't accept it, there is no Trichomes on a weed plant that can effectively reproduce what they found on a fern.

Even the fern is rarely burnt it's a very freak occasion. Water needs to be held of the leaf just to start with.

Grow up you just can't accept being wrong!

You actually should have known this before getting involved on the subject, shows how you approach things and why you get things wrong.

The reason why if you midday spray plants you don't crisp up your garden come afternoon!!!!
Click to expand...
Can’t we just enjoy megalomania in peace ffs!?πŸ˜…
 
#85
amneziaHaze said:
Do give up too fast

The persistent [Ca2+]str increase is caused by HL stress, accompanied by photoinhibition and 1O2 accumulation
Part of a biphasic Ca2+ response, the subsequent persistent [Ca2+]str increase occurred together with hallmarks of HL stress, as the decrease of chlorophyll autofluorescence and Fv/Fm (Figures 4C and S7) indicated strong damage to the photosystems.13 The persistent [Ca2+]str increase was light dose dependent, occurring when light intensity exceeded 1,100 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1 (Figure S5), and was robustly triggered at 2,000 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1 (Figure 3; Table S1), typical of outdoor sunlight. Beyond 2,000 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1, natural lensing conditions, such as water droplets, should be considered. While the effect of focused natural light on plant physiology is rarely studied,4 focused sunlight spots are common in nature, e.g., on days with intermittent rain and sunshine (Figures 1A and 1B). We simulated this by focusing microscope light through a glass bead to trigger a persistent [Ca2+]str increase (Figure 1C). Light focused through water droplets could create a β€œmultiple dot effect,” mimicking localized hypersensitive response-like cell death. In contrast, exposing a large area to white light likely triggers a more uniform, systemic stress response involving broader signaling and defense mechanisms. This suggests that localized and widespread light stress may engage distinct regulatory pathways. Specialized acclimation signaling, such as a stromal Ca2+ response, may be crucial to prevent sunburn and cell death,71,72 warranting further study.


I think a study has more worth than a blog post
Even says its natural to have fucked up leafs outside as you confidently say you never saw and dont beleve.

But as i said i am arguing with a person zhat doesnt know its cloudy when it rains and thinks you can start a fire with water is above it

And why do you post a google post about watering? Thats a different subject watering is water on soil not water on leafs
Click to expand...
Even my blue blocking glasses won’t raise my intelligence levels enough to understand all this.☝️
 
#87
Besides, my question hasn’t been answered yet. How many watts? This needs to turned into a competition. How low can we go?
πŸ€” 5 watts in a shoe box challenge?🀣
 
#88
Person said:
Besides, my question hasn’t been answered yet. How many watts? This needs to turned into a competition. How low can we go?
πŸ€” 5 watts in a shoe box challenge?🀣
Click to expand...
Whats the point you cant get more grams than watts
 
#89
I sure hope you're growing an auto but bravo in the build.πŸ˜‰
 
#90
amneziaHaze said:
Do give up too fast

The persistent [Ca2+]str increase is caused by HL stress, accompanied by photoinhibition and 1O2 accumulation
Part of a biphasic Ca2+ response, the subsequent persistent [Ca2+]str increase occurred together with hallmarks of HL stress, as the decrease of chlorophyll autofluorescence and Fv/Fm (Figures 4C and S7) indicated strong damage to the photosystems.13 The persistent [Ca2+]str increase was light dose dependent, occurring when light intensity exceeded 1,100 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1 (Figure S5), and was robustly triggered at 2,000 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1 (Figure 3; Table S1), typical of outdoor sunlight. Beyond 2,000 ΞΌmol photons m⁻2 s⁻1, natural lensing conditions, such as water droplets, should be considered. While the effect of focused natural light on plant physiology is rarely studied,4 focused sunlight spots are common in nature, e.g., on days with intermittent rain and sunshine (Figures 1A and 1B). We simulated this by focusing microscope light through a glass bead to trigger a persistent [Ca2+]str increase (Figure 1C). Light focused through water droplets could create a β€œmultiple dot effect,” mimicking localized hypersensitive response-like cell death. In contrast, exposing a large area to white light likely triggers a more uniform, systemic stress response involving broader signaling and defense mechanisms. This suggests that localized and widespread light stress may engage distinct regulatory pathways. Specialized acclimation signaling, such as a stromal Ca2+ response, may be crucial to prevent sunburn and cell death,71,72 warranting further study.


I think a study has more worth than a blog post
Even says its natural to have fucked up leafs outside as you confidently say you never saw and dont beleve.

But as i said i am arguing with a person zhat doesnt know its cloudy when it rains and thinks you can start a fire with water is above it

And why do you post a google post about watering? Thats a different subject watering is water on soil not water on leafs
Click to expand...
Bro seriously, that is a lame study on a plant that is severely photo inhibited plus has different levels of ca2+ pools in its chloroplast and no where in the study did they replicate it produce any burn marks except at a molecular level which simply altered the plant response path.

Your desperate to prove that if we spray our plants they burn, that simple and I posted a vid of a guy doing just that and no plants got burnt.

Ego again isn't it, the answer is no he won't make a magnifying glass and cause cellular death via a focused beam of light capable of causing ignition temperatures.

People spray their weed plants all the time it's safe to, or have you got actual evidence on threads plants got burnt.

I guess in some situations this could happen on some plants but with account to thermal mass problems and other mechanisms it really doesn't happen and never to use, why I could go spray a whole tent down not see a single mark.... many have and could tell you, clones would be screwed!
 
#92
KG1 said:
Bro seriously, that is a lame study on a plant that is severely photo inhibited plus has different levels of ca2+ pools in its chloroplast and no where in the study did they replicate it produce any burn marks except at a molecular level which simply altered the plant response path.

Your desperate to prove that if we spray our plants they burn, that simple and I posted a vid of a guy doing just that and no plants got burnt.

Ego again isn't it, the answer is no he won't make a magnifying glass and cause cellular death via a focused beam of light capable of causing ignition temperatures.

People spray their weed plants all the time it's safe to, or have you got actual evidence on threads plants got burnt.

I guess in some situations this could happen on some plants but with account to thermal mass problems and other mechanisms it really doesn't happen and never to use, why I could go spray a whole tent down not see a single mark.... many have and could tell you, clones would be screwed!
Click to expand...
Literally says that cloroplast died in the part i cut out for your. Sad well i wont be debating with you anymore its like talking to a flat earther that doesnt beleve in a magnifing glass
 
#94
Sorry op the flates got me.i wanted to save you from making a mistake it ended up in long texts
 
#99
my math stands to reason , you COULD run a solo shot glass grow in a full sized pringles can with a 120mm fan on the top and bottom for 100% air flow line the entire thing with the 15watt roll of grow light tape keep it bottom fed thru a drip pan and feed it on a drip like one for lizards it COULD work lmao lil weed tube hahahahah
 
#100
I’m gonna smack you bizzys all in the mush soon. πŸ˜…I’ll show ya!
But nah this is why I generally don’t get involved with internet activity.
β€œBrain Dead, do what they said, with several different conflicting messages in the same head” 🀯 fuck This!πŸ˜‚
 
Page 5 of 11 · Replies 81–100 of 205
Back
Top Bottom