• Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • Nutrients and Fertilizers
  • 120-60-300-120-60-177.2 Nutrient Tutorial, or, My Thread Can Beat Up Your Thread.

120-60-300-120-60-177.2 Nutrient Tutorial, or, My Thread Can Beat Up Your Thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dankworth
  • Start date Start date Feb 13, 2012
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

120-60-300-120-60-177.2 Nutrient Tutorial, or, My Thread Can Beat Up Your Thread.

dankworth Feb 13, 2012 602 Replies 107,347 Views
Page 24 of 31 · Replies 461–480 of 603
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 31
Next
First Prev 24 of 31 Next Last

ttystikk

Posts
6,891
Reactions
8,392
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Points
313
Dec 28, 2012
#461
I've seen what Dankworth's been doing- I only steal from the best! ;) Thanks for the in-depth explanation, it helped me visualize these much better.

Since my system is really an RDWC, I imagine that the increased circulation through the bottom of my buckets (open water vs. growth media) makes a big difference in the efficacy of using airstones. In my case, they were essential in getting the roots to cross the air gap between the bottom of my 8" netpot bucket lids and the water level in the bucket beneath. While I can't yet quantify it with any precision, I can tell you that the difference between using airstones and not was night and day for me.

Dank's discussion of hater buckets inspired me to go with 50/50 hyroton/coco as a growth media, and to topfeed with an irrigation system in addition to the RDWC. While some have derided this as being too complicated, I'm finding benefits to the hybrid approach:
  1. irrigating with the RDWC water allows one to use the same water and res.
  2. this water pours through the media, feeding the plants and the rhizosphere, which then filters the water before it drops back into the RDWC
  3. I run zero sterilants, and don't even sterilize between runs, just a quick hose flush. The bennies handle everything as long as I keep them cool, moist and aerated.
  4. No more guesswork about how much to water the plants vs runoff; just drench the shit out of them and watch them reach for the sky!
  5. my inexpert observbations have hinted that the plants' roots respond to each growing environment differently; they get fuzzy with mycos in the coco, and fishbone like mad in the water.
  6. everything is reusable, from the netpots to the media- I even pour the spent nutrient water on my grass and trees.
  7. This appears to remove the limitations of adequate watering and has allowed me to concentrate on optimizing other aspects of the growing environment.
 
Reactions: Pancho-N-Lefty
Quote Reply

midwestdensies

Posts
2,886
Reactions
8,939
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Points
263
Dec 28, 2012
#462
Sounds like you have it figured out ty especially with reusability and efficiency. I love chow myself as well and after messing with some chow and hempys its time to play a little more..
 
Reactions: ttystikk
Quote Reply

ttystikk

Posts
6,891
Reactions
8,392
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Points
313
Dec 28, 2012
#463
midwestdensies said:
Sounds like you have it figured out ty especially with reusability and efficiency. I love chow myself as well and after messing with some chow and hempys its time to play a little more..
Click to expand...

Oh, no! I don't have it all figured out, not by a loooong shot! I'm just further up the error/response curve than some, lol.

Using the chowmix solved my problems; all hydroton and there was no microlife in the media, all coco and it was drowning (I'm using the coffee grounds sized stuff). Half and half was perfect. It seems to be a similar story with the topfeed irrigation vs. RDWC; both have their benefits and each tends to negate the other's weaknesses, leading to synergistic results- that is, better than the sum of the parts might suggest.
 
Reactions: midwestdensies
Quote Reply

Dirty White Boy

Posts
884
Reactions
947
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Points
93
Dec 28, 2012
#464
well a krusty bucket is a hempy with constantly flowing nutes in the bottom rez, hempy is basically a stand alone bucket with small rez at the bottom its basically just a wick system. Hater buckets eh....you get the point its all just about the same. And dont forget you also have a earth bucket.....same idea. Ever single grow thread Ive ever put on here was in a hempy so you can go back and check my stuff out if you want a look.
 
Reactions: midwestdensies and ttystikk
Quote Reply

Dirty White Boy

Posts
884
Reactions
947
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Points
93
Dec 28, 2012
#465
hempy beds are THE SHIT!!! and about as simple as you can get.
 
Reactions: swisscheese and midwestdensies
Quote Reply

ttystikk

Posts
6,891
Reactions
8,392
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Points
313
Dec 28, 2012
#466
midwestdensies said:
Sounds like you have it figured out ty especially with reusability and efficiency. I love chow myself as well and after messing with some chow and hempys its time to play a little more..
Click to expand...

I feel very strongly about inefficiency, for several reasons:
  1. it's wasteful, by definition- landfills are full enough and power plants run enough already
  2. it's expensive! AND it's coming out of my pocket
  3. efficiency pays for itself, by definition; no matter how small, the savings add up
  4. efficiency is another way of saying reduced cost of production, or increased productivity; this also translates as competitive advantage
  5. efficiency encourages control, and better control almost always results in better bud!
Finally, this industry is following the same cost curve as all the rest; as time goes on, prices come down, bringing profits down with them. Those who survive in such a market climate will have to be efficient, or they will have no profit at all- and thus be driven out of business by those who are.
 
Quote Reply

midwestdensies

Posts
2,886
Reactions
8,939
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Points
263
Dec 28, 2012
#467
Fuck ya DWB! I know you know. I would love to see what your working on buddy (hempy bed you said you may show more importantly). YOuve inspired me several times just to let you know. Keep that head up also
Dirty White Boy said:
hempy beds are THE SHIT!!! and about as simple as you can get.
Click to expand...
 
Quote Reply

LexLuthor

Posts
2,972
Reactions
2,576
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Points
263
Dec 28, 2012
#468
Hey Dankworth, you use 27 gallon totes with 2"of water at the bottom and , I guess, 8" net pots. Thats alot of space between the water and bottom of your pots, so how do you get the roots to grow down without air pruning??
 
Quote Reply

LexLuthor

Posts
2,972
Reactions
2,576
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Points
263
Dec 28, 2012
#469
Dirty White Boy said:
hempy beds are THE SHIT!!! and about as simple as you can get.
Click to expand...


Hempy beds?? That sounds like the shit, can you post a link to your journal so I can check it out?
 
Quote Reply

Dirty White Boy

Posts
884
Reactions
947
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Points
93
Dec 28, 2012
#470
https://www.thcfarmer.com/community/threads/dirty-little-box.49990/

this is a little box I was dicking with before I left texas. Ive got a little dig going on right now thats got 5'x10' hempy beds.....28 of them HEHEHEHE! ill slap up some pics when the project is done.
 
Reactions: LexLuthor
Quote Reply

midwestdensies

Posts
2,886
Reactions
8,939
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Points
263
Dec 28, 2012
#471
lex0415 said:
Hey Dankworth, you use 27 gallon totes with 2"of water at the bottom and , I guess, 8" net pots. Thats alot of space between the water and bottom of your pots, so how do you get the roots to grow down without air pruning??
Click to expand...
It really isnt the biggest gap and the roots love water plus the airstone. Its enclosed and the roots sit in the aerated water which is replaced often or as you feel fit for your application via top drip. I was told an aquarium airstone or 2 with a commercial air 3 for 2-4 totes. . Also the pots that seem to work well are called ez roots aeration frames.

DWB- Fuckin A!! I cant wait to see that I actually built a mini bed once for a tester before I relocated and had to just give it away before flowering it. (just had cool strains and gifted them to a friend) I never did check on that thing though.. but it was very cool and I put holes all around the bed just even height and chow mix fuck it had my brain churning. Anyway good luck with things amigo
MW
 
Reactions: LexLuthor
Quote Reply
S

swisscheese

Guest
Dec 28, 2012
#472
Hempy beds rock!
 
Quote Reply

dankworth

Posts
1,519
Reactions
1,673
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Points
163
Dec 28, 2012
#473
lex0415 said:
Hey Dankworth, you use 27 gallon totes with 2"of water at the bottom and , I guess, 8" net pots. Thats alot of space between the water and bottom of your pots, so how do you get the roots to grow down without air pruning??
Click to expand...

I use the 3 gal ez roots aeration frames(now redi-root aeration frames or some shit). 2 per tote. Eventually will fit a single 7 gal aeration frame per 27 gal tote.
I keep the frame suspended slightly higher than the solution at the bottom of the tote. Only a couple gallons hang out there. That solution is runoff from the aeration frame being top-dripped into periodically. The plant uses some solution up from the chow mix frame, and also consumes some of the shallow water layer(SWC) fluid body. Between those two opportunities for feeding, the whole tote should be getting ideally 20% or so runoff. For every 5 gallons fed to a tote, 1 gallon should overflow out.
The irrigation should be timed so that there is a relatively constant slow dripping of fluid from the bottom of the aeration frame to the shallow water layer. Those drops will run down the roots protruding from the bottom of the aeration frame. If they have an airstone like ttystikk says, then they will have bubbles popping at the water surface right underneath them, spraying them with nute solution. That will encourage them even more to grow into the shallow water body. Once the roots hit oxygenated water like that, the plant takes the fuck off. Especially in an optimized environment.

I think the shortest gap from the aeration frame to the water is best. Will eventually build pvc supports for the aeration frame. Giddeon had an awesome idea, he built a box-shaped pvc frame to support the bucket in his system, and also drilled the bottom of it out so that it could be used as an airstone.

As time goes on, I will make the shallow water layer deeper.
 
Reactions: LexLuthor, ttystikk and midwestdensies
Quote Reply

dankworth

Posts
1,519
Reactions
1,673
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Points
163
Dec 28, 2012
#474



Was too broke for airstones. Had to use cpvc w/holes drilled. At this point I like the airstones from the fish section at Wal-mart.
 
Reactions: ttystikk and kushtrees
Quote Reply
K

kushtrees

Posts
591
Reactions
303
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Points
63
Dec 28, 2012
#475
I'm sure you have thought about this dank but what about a air line soaker hose style in the SWC. Then it would be almost identical to a krusty bucket. If anyone wants to see a krusty bucket a simple google images search of krusty bucket design has a drawing its easy to find i think its from ICmag.

if your using the 27g totes why not use larger pots so that you have a larger surface area for roots to drop into the water. Ive been meaning to try out your hater buckets i love the concept, but i cannot figure out a reliable way to hold a 20g smart pot above the water, 7g pot is just to small for my purposes... maybe the pvc frame...
 
Quote Reply

dankworth

Posts
1,519
Reactions
1,673
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Points
163
Dec 28, 2012
#476
kushtrees said:
I'm sure you have thought about this dank but what about a air line soaker hose style in the SWC. Then it would be almost identical to a krusty bucket. If anyone wants to see a krusty bucket a simple google images search of krusty bucket design has a drawing its easy to find i think its from ICmag.

if your using the 27g totes why not use larger pots so that you have a larger surface area for roots to drop into the water. Ive been meaning to try out your hater buckets i love the concept, but i cannot figure out a reliable way to hold a 20g smart pot above the water, 7g pot is just to small for my purposes... maybe the pvc frame...
Click to expand...

I like the idea of using teas to add organic inputs to the system. I suspect that teas, etc. may clog up a soakder hose faster. But I have never tried soaker hoses, can't say for sure what they would need to work out correctly.

I had a dozen totes and around 300 gallons of coco and perlite to dispose of this one time. 25 gals of medium per tote. I hated. Wanted to get back to a bucket system to reduce total labor. Krusty advocated growing a smaller number of root hairs/root tips, and flowing nute solution past them to get the growth done.

Too much medium for me to want to deal with in a 20 gal smartpot.

Edit-it was Mr. Dizzle talking about salvaging an mpb run by going back to hempy buckets that got me into hempy buckets.
 
Reactions: ttystikk and midwestdensies
Quote Reply
K

kushtrees

Posts
591
Reactions
303
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Points
63
Dec 28, 2012
#477
I completely understand I have chow mix coming out my ears...

I have a small plant limit unfortunately so all my plants are over 2#. I wouldnt put that large of a plant in a 7g bucket even with SWC at the bottom, maybe DWC... but Ive been weary of switching everything to water culture aftr seeing some of the UC MPB disasters.

nice pics btw
 
Reactions: ttystikk
Quote Reply

dankworth

Posts
1,519
Reactions
1,673
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Points
163
Dec 28, 2012
#478
kushtrees said:
I completely understand I have chow mix coming out my ears...

I have a small plant limit unfortunately so all my plants are over 2#. I wouldnt put that large of a plant in a 7g bucket even with SWC at the bottom, maybe DWC... but Ive been weary of switching everything to water culture aftr seeing some of the UC MPB disasters.

nice pics btw
Click to expand...
I believe that rdwc offers less disease resistance than standalone dwc. Single station dwc, judging from grow journals, seems to tolerate higher temps well without rotting out. One of the big reasons I don't want to recirculate nute solution. Also why I have a shallow water layer, gets turned over by runoff faster, so is fresher.
 
Reactions: ttystikk
Quote Reply

ttystikk

Posts
6,891
Reactions
8,392
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Points
313
Dec 29, 2012
#479
kushtrees said:
I completely understand I have chow mix coming out my ears...

I have a small plant limit unfortunately so all my plants are over 2#. I wouldnt put that large of a plant in a 7g bucket even with SWC at the bottom, maybe DWC... but Ive been weary of switching everything to water culture aftr seeing some of the UC MPB disasters.
Click to expand...

dankworth said:
I believe that rdwc offers less disease resistance than standalone dwc. Single station dwc, judging from grow journals, seems to tolerate higher temps well without rotting out. One of the big reasons I don't want to recirculate nute solution. Also why I have a shallow water layer, gets turned over by runoff faster, so is fresher.
Click to expand...

I AM running an RDWC underneath 8" netpot bucket lids. I have topfeed, and one run has airstones and one is without. I'm not gonna bother waiting until the experiment is officially finished, because just one of the plants in the room with airstones has more roots than the whole other room combined. Clearly, the water splashing up from the bubbles is important.

Since I'm running an RDWC, I keep the water cool, around 60-65 degrees F. It's coldest in the 'morning', and warms up throughout the 'day', just like I imagine the soil would. This, plus bennies in the water draining down from the coco/hydroton in the netpots, keeps the RDWC in top condition against pathogens. I don't even sterilize between runs anymore, just a good spray out and flush with the hose.

the reason I say all this- again- is because I believe that Dankworth's system and mine are slowly evolving towards one another. Most of the difference at this point amounts to the fact that he runs drain to waste, while recirculating the nutes in my RDWC is an integral component of my approach.
 
Quote Reply

LexLuthor

Posts
2,972
Reactions
2,576
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Points
263
Dec 29, 2012
#480
After looking at the pics they are alot closer to the water then I imagined and your explanation got me to understand it way better. Thanx
 
Quote Reply
Page 24 of 31 · Replies 461–480 of 603
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 31
Next
First Prev 24 of 31 Next Last

Thread info

Replies 602
Views 107,347
Started Feb 13, 2012
Latest post Aug 24, 2016
Starter dankworth
Forum Nutrients and Fertilizers

Latest posts

  • Best way to cure large quantities
    • Latest: Oldchucky
    • A moment ago
    Cannabis Harvesting & Curing
  • 2026 Outdoor Grows! let's see em!
    • Latest: orggrwr
    • 1 minute ago
    General Outdoor Growing
  • I
    Mars Hydro API reverse engineered
    • Latest: Inzemix
    • 28 minutes ago
    Growroom Design & Setup
  • Cpurola's Outdoor grow in Southeast Michigan 2026
    • Latest: grayoldnproud
    • 29 minutes ago
    General Outdoor Growing
  • itscheese`s cheese thread
    • Latest: Oldchucky
    • 45 minutes ago
    Introduce Yourself
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • Nutrients and Fertilizers
  • 120-60-300-120-60-177.2 Nutrient Tutorial, or, My Thread Can Beat Up Your Thread.
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2026 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Sign up

  • Home
  • News
  • Classifieds
  • Forums
    • What's new Featured content New posts New Articles New articles New products Latest activity
  • Social
  • Strains
  • Live
  • Learn
  • Brands
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?