Nybadboy
- Posts
- 212
- Reactions
- 125
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2016
- Points
- 43
It started all over it to be honest
Yes bro it was to uWas this a question for me? @Nybadboy. I'm in Maine, tho. 6 flowering, 18 veg, unlimited seedlings for patients
That's sickIs that similar to 2 girls 1 cup?
I've never had the urge to look it up.. lolThat's sick
IIRC, aspen grow clonally, EG, again IIRC, the oldest living organism on earth is a stand of aspen somewhere in the Rockies that are thought to be something like 80,000yo. Cannabis is an annual that does not grow clonally even though it can be cloned. What you're thinking about is a method of growing clones together outside, pushed all together, to make them look like one plant. Each clone doesn't grow more than what its neighbor allows (and, believe you me, police count trunks, too). So, I don't know that they compete for space, when I've grown clones tightly together they just... grew together. They didn't grow bigger/better, they performed the same as a clone planted by itself. I hope that makes sense.
Makes sense. Didn't take into consideration for cannons being an annual plant either. Just something I had wondered about.
Well bro if you know from a scientific level that ca is calcium which is a macro nutrient and its mobile if its working downwards on the plant its a micro deficiency micro nutrients are immobile ca can be moved to the top part of the plants thats why calcium deficiencies start at the bottom and go upIIRC, aspen grow clonally, EG, again IIRC, the oldest living organism on earth is a stand of aspen somewhere in the Rockies that are thought to be something like 80,000yo. Cannabis is an annual that does not grow clonally even though it can be cloned. What you're thinking about is a method of growing clones together outside, pushed all together, to make them look like one plant. Each clone doesn't grow more than what its neighbor allows (and, believe you me, police count trunks, too). So, I don't know that they compete for space, when I've grown clones tightly together they just... grew together. They didn't grow bigger/better, they performed the same as a clone planted by itself. I hope that makes sense.
The issue that is really presenting itself when one plants multiple seedlings together has to do as much with handling should they all turn out to be female (and either one of them is a keeper), and how rough you may need to be if one turns out to be a male, or hermies, etc. I don't think it's a hard rule in that regard, it's just a handling issue more than anything from my perspective.
I don't know, sorry!
Really? If it's starting from the top, wouldn't that indicate an immobile element, not mobile? Wouldn't a macronutrient that's immobile be something like Ca here? On a scientific level is why I'm asking these questions, because what you're posting doesn't make sense in that regard.
Macro nutrients are mobile so calcium is mobile cuz its a macro nutrient if it works top to bottom its micro nutrient deficiencyIIRC, aspen grow clonally, EG, again IIRC, the oldest living organism on earth is a stand of aspen somewhere in the Rockies that are thought to be something like 80,000yo. Cannabis is an annual that does not grow clonally even though it can be cloned. What you're thinking about is a method of growing clones together outside, pushed all together, to make them look like one plant. Each clone doesn't grow more than what its neighbor allows (and, believe you me, police count trunks, too). So, I don't know that they compete for space, when I've grown clones tightly together they just... grew together. They didn't grow bigger/better, they performed the same as a clone planted by itself. I hope that makes sense.
The issue that is really presenting itself when one plants multiple seedlings together has to do as much with handling should they all turn out to be female (and either one of them is a keeper), and how rough you may need to be if one turns out to be a male, or hermies, etc. I don't think it's a hard rule in that regard, it's just a handling issue more than anything from my perspective.
I don't know, sorry!
Really? If it's starting from the top, wouldn't that indicate an immobile element, not mobile? Wouldn't a macronutrient that's immobile be something like Ca here? On a scientific level is why I'm asking these questions, because what you're posting doesn't make sense in that regard.
Bra, not bro. Ca is immobile. Deficiencies appear on newest growth, not older. It is considered by some to be one of the secondary macronutrients outside of NPK along with Mg and S.Well bro if you know from a scientific level that ca is calcium which is a macro nutrient and its mobile if its working downwards on the plant its a micro deficiency micro nutrients are immobile ca can be moved to the top part of the plants thats why calcium deficiencies start at the bottom and go up
I think you want to reexamine that stance bro. Ca is immobile. You wanna read Homesteader's link, or one I provide you? It's cited by other researchers (as is Homesteader's), but what the hell, let's do it anyway, shall we?Macro nutrients are mobile so calcium is mobile cuz its a macro nutrient if it works top to bottom its micro nutrient deficiency
Calcium is a mobile nutrientIIRC, aspen grow clonally, EG, again IIRC, the oldest living organism on earth is a stand of aspen somewhere in the Rockies that are thought to be something like 80,000yo. Cannabis is an annual that does not grow clonally even though it can be cloned. What you're thinking about is a method of growing clones together outside, pushed all together, to make them look like one plant. Each clone doesn't grow more than what its neighbor allows (and, believe you me, police count trunks, too). So, I don't know that they compete for space, when I've grown clones tightly together they just... grew together. They didn't grow bigger/better, they performed the same as a clone planted by itself. I hope that makes sense.
The issue that is really presenting itself when one plants multiple seedlings together has to do as much with handling should they all turn out to be female (and either one of them is a keeper), and how rough you may need to be if one turns out to be a male, or hermies, etc. I don't think it's a hard rule in that regard, it's just a handling issue more than anything from my perspective.
I don't know, sorry!
Really? If it's starting from the top, wouldn't that indicate an immobile element, not mobile? Wouldn't a macronutrient that's immobile be something like Ca here? On a scientific level is why I'm asking these questions, because what you're posting doesn't make sense in that regard.
According to whom? Citation. If you know science, you can find citations.Calcium is a mobile nutrient
I do know science calcium is a macro nutrient macros are mobile they move up the plant im going to school for plants and i took a test on this, this monthAccording to whom? Citation. If you know science, you can find citations.
Then tell me why did we have a test on this and i got it correct then?@Bobby reefah Calcium is an immobile nutrient and thus why it shows deficiency in younger growth because the plant cannot transfer calcium from older leaves.
I stand corrected calcium is not a mobile nutrientAccording to whom? Citation. If you know science, you can find citations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?