MushinNoShin
- 739
- 143
ya im from canada but even up here there is always ppl who do shit like that....and to be honest its usually ppl with garbage, or mediocre stuff, that they then rename to be able to sell better, with whatever is "in" at the moment...No, that was from All Star Nursery website. Not the same thing, they said Jew's Gold was the Skywalker OG renamed.
You'd be surprised, I've found info out here in SoCal meeting and talking with people in person that totally differs from the info on the forum scene. And I'm not talking rumors and speculation from random patients. A lot of these cuts originated in my backyard (SoCal).
Just wanted to see if anyone could/would corroborate their claim. I'm a bit younger, but I know my genetics pretty well, lol.
good post skunk.....though i wonder how many of those genetics out there today, are untouched since then, or how many are originals and not renamed down the line somewhere over the last 25 years....far to many if you ask me....though im sure there are some that are still around...most imo have been messed with or renamed along the wayIv heard of the original pure kushes get tagged 91 og. Just like I hear sometimes the original bubba kush cut tagged 92 bubba.
Everything said after this point is my own speculation....
I believe og and chem to have similar genetics but I don't think og came from chem directly and if it did it came from dog bud not the chem dog seeds that chem dog found from the dog bud itself. With that being said.... it is extremely possible for og kush to have been around in 91. I think it was around far before that but by different names and the line may have not been worked as long
Iv smoked many og flowers with 91 tagged on them. 91 malibu, 91 fire..ext ext. Most have been pretty fire too. But if you had my guess... that 91 tag is more referring to the pure kushes that are more og not the bubba kush type pure kushes then actual og kush straight up. Like I said though, just the conclusion iv came to based on personal experience and stories iv put together from stuff iv read or heard ~SMF~
I had a feeling because I heard the King Louis XIII OG cut has been around since the 80's. I always suspected some sort of relation between the Chems and OG as well. Hindu and bubba too.Iv heard of the original pure kushes get tagged 91 og. Just like I hear sometimes the original bubba kush cut tagged 92 bubba.
Everything said after this point is my own speculation....
I believe og and chem to have similar genetics but I don't think og came from chem directly and if it did it came from dog bud not the chem dog seeds that chem dog found from the dog bud itself. With that being said.... it is extremely possible for og kush to have been around in 91. I think it was around far before that but by different names and the line may have not been worked as long
Iv smoked many og flowers with 91 tagged on them. 91 malibu, 91 fire..ext ext. Most have been pretty fire too. But if you had my guess... that 91 tag is more referring to the pure kushes that are more og not the bubba kush type pure kushes then actual og kush straight up. Like I said though, just the conclusion iv came to based on personal experience and stories iv put together from stuff iv read or heard ~SMF~
I`ve had OGK from about 1990 ,Bubba also. I don`t think that many people had it that far back . I`ve had other Kushes from the 70`s. I don`t think most people had any OGK until orgkid released it, I`m thinking around the mid 90`s? I only know of a handful of people who had it that far back.
What's your IG handle?First of all Orgnkid got his og from Josh D. He said so himself on ig. Josh got the OG in 1996. Before that the only mention of OG related bud is the TK grown late 80's in Florida. Are you suggesting you invented OG?
What's your IG handle?
First of all Orgnkid got his og from Josh D. He said so himself on ig. Josh got the OG in 1996. Before that the only mention of OG related bud is the TK grown late 80's in Florida. Are you suggesting you invented OG?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?