Shamus
- 1,576
- 263
no
lol
unless your talking bout plasma
lol
unless your talking bout plasma
yeah so far plasma's are the alternative ive heard of doing real well in bloom but very expensive. Been advised by at least one person to veg with lec and then add a plasma or hps when it comes time to flower. Do u use plasma shamus? I dont think i have ever seens a grow under plasma yet on here or irl.
Ive pretty much decided not to bother trying anything besides hps for flower as the tech in led, lec, induction doesnt seem to live up to the potential or hype as of yet without supplemental lighting from hps. Would you recommend a specific plasma light comparable to 1000w hps?
dojoking thanks for the links and info on those lights. In your opinion is it worth 1000 dollars for a supplemental lighting/veg light? I have heard very good things about lec, plasma led, and induction for veg, but everyone says you need to add at least a 600w hps during flowering with any of those systems to get those good yields. Based on that it seems cost effective and plenty productive to use 1 600w mh for veg and 2 600 hps for flowering. . Possible a mh and hps as someone here mentioned would be interesting to try. An alternative i may try might be 1 230w lec for veg and then 1 230w lec to supp a 600w hps for flowering. I personally had good experiences with a 250w hydrofarm cfl and then 400w hps for flower, but double as good experience vegging with the 400w mh and flower with 400w hps in a small closet. Neither of those put off heat too bad, they were hot to touch but they didnt heatup the room to the point of being inhospitable. I usually didnt use any cooling besides keeping the room somewhere around 65-75 degrees with fans or ac during the worst points of summer in a basement. What would the benefits of supplementing an already energy hogging hid system? For the price I couldnt see it being that much better than just using more hid watts. It seems the mixing of light spectrum is the explanation but im wondering why that matters so much if people get good results with a normal veg or bloom colored hid. Like for instance someone uses a 1000w hps to flower in a certain area, what would the changes be when they add one of these supplemental lighting systems to the same area and same hps compared to either not adding any additional lighting or adding the same amount of watts in addition traditional lighting (hid, fluoro)? Has anyone seen a similar experiment type side by side grow where someone sees the yield and "quality" difference with this? If people are getting good yields, the texture they like, proper smell and taste and the maximum thc potential or at least close to it what would constitute an increase in quality with supplemental lighting? I could think maybe for some reason it could bring out more vibrant colors or something? Im interested in hearing thoughts on this and seeing the results people got with supplemental lights with their hid compared to just the new light or just a hid ect., basically all variables.
wow! see now that youtube video is exactly what is making me want to look into these lights. Almost everyone says to avoid them and I agree until I see a video like that which makes me want to try that exact light. I wonder how the quality compares between hps and led, in the video the difference looked minimal but the hps looked a bit nicer. Flavor, taste, and high are the big 3 imop and the only difference I noticed is a little bit of color variation. The guys mentions a more pungent smell from the darker led nugs. It would be cool if the same guy had a smoke test vid of the two.
damn, regardless its exactly the type of video/info i was hoping for. Please update me if you see a video come up when those results come in?
irish boii, nice grow man itll be cool to see how it turns out with that led. Ill stay tuned. Good luck!
thanks dojoking, i will do that. irishboii that seems like a reasonable goal, i hope you achieve it