Stokes
- Posts
- 1,479
- Reactions
- 2,705
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2021
- Points
- 263
I was looking at the ss550 bt CLW, how happy are you with your light?My light comes equipped and I've always utilized the function. Never tried a comparison grow.
I just watched it. Now I know a lot more than I did before. I've thought about adding UV light, but haven't justified the cost for my purposes. I did, however, read something that claimed a small section of UVC (~220 nm) influenced plants' need for magnesium. Since I saw that report, I haven't been able to find any more information about it. Nevertheless, it seems plants grown under LED lights need more Mg and something about the light spectrum is likely to be the reason, IMO.Maybe you’ve seen it! It’s short.
I have the SS CLW 550. i just got it but it seems to be doing a good job. I like how you can dial the RWB and it even keeps track of how long your grow is.I was looking at the ss550 bt CLW, how happy are you with your light?
"Actually, this one is true. Even a cheap UVB bulb is better than no UVB. That said, for a little more than a cheap UVB bulb, you can have the best UVB around, and since Flower Power last twice as long, they really aren't more expensive. So use what you have, but make room to upgrade later if you really want top shelf results."
I used it on my last grow because it was a standard on my light. I can't say that I noticed any special difference. In fact my harvest was lacking the wow factor on the trichomes in my opinion. Maybe it's genetics. We will see on the next run.I just watched it. Now I know a lot more than I did before. I've thought about adding UV light, but haven't justified the cost for my purposes. I did, however, read something that claimed a small section of UVC (~220 nm) influenced plants' need for magnesium. Since I saw that report, I haven't been able to find any more information about it. Nevertheless, it seems plants grown under LED lights need more Mg and something about the light spectrum is likely to be the reason, IMO.
uv needs to be used the whole grow to have any affectUV is only recommended in weeks before harvest ( last 3 weeks of flower - question running at ? only 4 hrs per days)
i think he means UVB. My CLW 550 has UVB lights that i will use at the last 3 weeks of flower.uv needs to be used the whole grow to have any affect
using it for 3 weeks does absolutely nothing,,i think he means UVB. My CLW 550 has UVB lights that i will use at the last 3 weeks of flower.
ok i guess you know more that CLW does.using it for 3 weeks does absolutely nothing,,
tell me how long a capitate-stalked trichome takes to grow and develop and become ripe for harvest? 3 weeks? hahaha at best your getting cystolythic trichomes which have no cannabinoids or terpenes,..
yep i dook i guess you know more that CLW does.
must ne nice to be you then huh.yep i do
must ne nice to be you then huh.
that totally contradicts everything that this light is suppose to do. in that case, if the info you provided is indeed correct then i should get my money back for this useless light.i’m
Cannabis Inflorescence Yield and Cannabinoid Concentration Are Not Increased With Exposure to Short-Wavelength Ultraviolet-B Radiation - PMC
Before ultraviolet (UV) radiation can be used as a horticultural management tool in commercial Cannabis sativa (cannabis) production, the effects of UV on cannabis should be vetted scientifically. In this study we investigated the effects of UV ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?