Solidopc
- Posts
- 179
- Reactions
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Points
- 16
Is anyone using Hydrofarm's Raptor reflectors? They are bigger than the XXLs. XXL Magnum 8 is 38½" x 29½" x 9½", the Raptor is 43.3L x 33.0W x 13.3H.
Dude go with the blockbuster 6", Not 8" , for ah 600w a XXXL is way to big, did test and the XXXL 6" are all around better in every way then the xxxl 8 . i run 6 XXXL,s and the blockbuster 6"
XXXL 6"= $230
Blockbuster 6"=$165
That Magnum XXXL 6" price is a little high...
$185.95 -
Or you could get a Great White 6" (Magnum XXXL copy) - $149.96 -
Dude go with the blockbuster 6", Not 8" , for ah 600w a XXXL is way to big, did test and the XXXL 6" are all around better in every way then the xxxl 8 . i run 6 XXXL,s and the blockbuster 6"
XXXL 6"= $230
Blockbuster 6"=$165
$165 OTD for blockbuster 6" i like um alot and run one in 4x4 Sun Hut w/1000w, hinged glass is nice, 95%, nice lid.
I'm guna get a blockbuster 6" hood. Looking at the specs of it and lumes put out over 1 depth and 30cm depth in one of those graph things, and footprint graphs. It way outperforms the magnum xxxl and sun system 2. There's no other choice to be made after seeing that. The light footprint is miles ahead of all the other reflectors tested, air-cooled/normal/adjustawing/vertizontal parabolic and quite a few more. Defintely the first choice for a square tent. I'm going to go with the compact ballast. I'm happy it will be fine, never had a problem with my onew so far, and heard the digi ballasts fuck up after a while.
hey bro>>The blockbuster doesn't out perform the XXXL<<:) I have seen side by side results, my bro has a whole room full of em<<He's wishing he went with the XXXL's:)<<<:harvest:
>>>for a square tent you arent gonna beat the foot print of the XXXL, seems they were married for a tent haha
gtd:passingjoint:
hey bro>>The blockbuster doesn't out perform the XXXL<<:) I have seen side by side results, my bro has a whole room full of em<<He's wishing he went with the XXXL's:)<<<:harvest:
>>>for a square tent you arent gonna beat the foot print of the XXXL, seems they were married for a tent haha
gtd:passingjoint:
Have a look at the pereformance data in the link there. These guys are one of the premier growshops in the UK, and dont sell stuff they havn't tested. They seem to think the blockbuster is much better for a sqaure areas, and the graphs you can flick through in the liunk i am giving seem to back that up. Each to their own i guess. The xxxl is bigger, but the blockbuster has a much better footprint, particulary for a square area, and its light penetration outperforms all the others they sell.
Ok>>I was just suggesting my man<<<
when I did a run in a 4x4 jardin d120>>I pulled 3.2 pounds of Casey Jones<<>>using a 4x4 table, XXXL hood and 1000 watt bulb:):harvest:I dont think that woulda happened if I used a blockbuster:)
gtd:passingjoint:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?