Log In Register

Bud density, typical for Autos?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kenk1960
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Bud density, typical for Autos?

kenk1960 42 Replies 5,447 Views
Page 3 of 3 · Replies 41–43 of 43
Its true, maybe the strain is like that or the seeds didnt have much potential even if the strain was suposed to be better. The yield per plant is not bad but I think he had big but fluffy buds (correct me if Im wrong). I dont expect all strains to give super tight nugs but I expect a minium of tightness even with old school sativas if theyre bred properly. I think the problem he had is one I faced many times in the past while working with autos and the reason I quited growing autos, you never know what to expect of them unless you work with the same strains and same breeder once you find a couple of good strains (there's a lot of shit autos out there, there's also a few really good ones that can handle HST but I wouldnt be able to tell you which ones since I dont grow them anymore). Look at this one, looks like a monster but the buds were pure fluff because I toped it, and even though the breeder said it was okay it wasnt at all, I chose a 3 month auto that was suposed to be able to handle toping, not even with the extra time:
View attachment 2353159
View attachment 2353161
No signs of them being unhealthy or anything, it was looking promissing but when the buds ended developing I was very dissapointed. It was a nice smoke, not very strong but pleasant but it was gone quick. Matanuska auto.
Had the same with autos outdoor, very nice smell, great appearance and nose, more a softy high which didn't last long and fluffier. But to be said the feed wasn't heavy as I am ridin' inside.
Imo low rh% makes a difference.
Hard to archive in my country, also high light intensity and proper phosphorus rates leads to denser buds.
 
Had the same with autos outdoor, very nice smell, great appearance and nose, more a softy high which didn't last long and fluffier. But to be said the feed wasn't heavy as I am ridin' inside.
Imo low rh% makes a difference.
Hard to archive in my country, also high light intensity and proper phosphorus rates leads to denser buds.
Im about them bouldersssss
Nurgets.
My rh is dead on 40 atm.
Love this arctic blast for stabalizing my flowering parameters indoors.
Makes me happy when it happens….👊🏻🤡
 
Oh, I get it bro. I’m not trying to be a dick or anything. I’m just doing it for the conversation, brother.
So your pre-treating your water before every feed or are you just dealing with the crazy swings that are coming from? I guess your water department?
I'm pretreating now because I didn't know I was having the insane swings from the municipal supply. When I figured out the swings were happening then it became clear why I was seeing all the issues concerning the plants. And it's on me. I screwed up by not checking ph. Got lazy and expected the basic organic setup I'm running would take on all ph issues. If I had been checking the ph before watering I would of caught it. And if I would have pulled my head out and done some soil ph slurry testing it could have all been avoided. So I was creating my own home rolled nutrient lock outs. Which was devastating for the GG4 auto that was packaged with GG4 photo seeds that I just happened to pop with a photo sister.
 
Page 3 of 3 · Replies 41–43 of 43
Back
Top Bottom