DEA Head Criticizes Obama For Telling The Truth About Marijuana

  • Thread starter oscar169
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
oscar169

oscar169

Farming 🌱
Supporter
2,729
263
During a speech to a conference of sheriffs in Washington, D.C., last week, Michele Leonhart, head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), reportedly criticized President Obama for saying marijuana is safer than alcohol. Bristol County, Massachusetts, Sheriff Thomas M. Hodgson gave this account to the Boston Herald:

She’s frustrated for the same reasons we are. She said she felt the administration didn’t understand the science enough to make those statements. She was particularly frustrated with the fact that, according to her, the White House participated in a softball game with a pro-legalization group….But she said her lowest point in 33 years in the DEA was when she learned they’d flown a hemp flag over the Capitol on July 4. The sheriffs were all shocked. This is the first time in 28 years I’ve ever heard anyone in her position be this candid.

Kern County, California, Sheriff Donny Youngblood, president of the Major Counties Sheriffs’ Association, the group Leonhart addressed, confirmed that she “called out Obama for what Youngblood described as ‘irresponsible’ comments that were a ‘big slap in the face’ to cops who have lost their lives keeping drugs off the street.” He said she received a standing ovation.

For Leonhart to describe Obama’s statement as unscientific is pretty rich. Like all of her predecessors, Leonhart has steadfastly refused to reclassify marijuana, which for no rational reason remains on Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, a category supposedly reserved for drugs with a high potential for abuse that have no accepted medical applications and cannot be used safely, even under medical supervision. In response to questions from Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) in 2012, Leonhart famously declined to say whether marijuana was more or less dangerous than crack, heroin, or methamphetamine (which is actually less restricted), repeating the mantra that “all illegal drugs are bad.” Mmmkay?

Michele-Leonhart3.jpg

DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart (Image: C-SPAN)

Leonhart’s objection to the hemp flag reflects the DEA’s unyielding opposition not only to marijuana itself but to anything associated with it. Although many countries manage to ban marijuana while allowing production of industrial hemp, which is not psychoactive, the DEA has always insisted those two policies cannot coexist, which is why the hemp for that flag had to be imported. The DEA’s fear and loathing of anything it associates with cannabis culture explains its bizarre, lawless attempt to ban all edible hemp products (such as the hemp seeds and hemp oil you can buy at Costco). That anti-hemp crusade was ultimately blocked by a federal appeals court, which said it had no statutory basis, since the Controlled Substances Act specifically excludes hemp seeds from its definition of marijuana.

You can call Leonhart’s revulsion at the thought of a hemp flag flying over the Capitol many things. But “scientific” is not one of them. Likewise, her refusal to concede that alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana has no scientific basis. Tellingly, Sheriff Youngblood calls Obama’s statement about the two drugs’ relative hazards “irresponsible” and offensive to drug warriors. He does not call it inaccurate.

Leonhart, of course, was Obama’s pick to head the DEA, and he surely knew what he was getting, since she had been running the agency as acting administrator since November 2007 and had served as its deputy administrator before that. As acting administrator, she overruled a DEA administrative law judge’s recommendation that University of Massachusetts at Amherst scientists be allowed to produce marijuana for research, a function currently monopolized by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, which is more interested in showing how dangerous marijuana is than in exploring its medical utility. That monopoly, unique to marijuana, is even harder to defend than the drug’s Schedule I status—which, by the way, Obama has the power to change without new legislation. It is fitting that Obama, having opted to stay the course in the war on drugs despite pre-election statements promising something else, has to endure sniping from the hardline prohibitionists he appointed now that has managed to utter an inconvenient truth.

Addendum: The Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) is urging Obama to fire Leonhart. Dan Riffle, MPP’s director of Federal Policies, says:

Whether Ms. Leonhart is ignorant of the facts or intentionally disregarding them, she is clearly unfit for her current position. By any objective measure, marijuana is less harmful than alcohol to the consumer and society. It is irresponsible and unacceptable for a government official charged with enforcing our drug laws to deny the facts surrounding the nation’s two most popular recreational drugs.

The DEA administrator’s continued refusal to recognize marijuana’s relative safety compared to alcohol and other drugs flies in the face of the president’s commitment to prioritizing science over ideology and politics. She is neglecting the basic obligations of her job and fundamentally undermining her employer’s mission. This would be grounds for termination in the private sector, and the consequences for Ms. Leonhart should be no different.

I don’t know about that. It seems to me Leonhart’s refusal to discuss the relative hazards of different intoxicants and her outrage at symbols of dissent makes her well-suited to lead the war on drugs, an emotion-driven crusade that has always been at odds with the truth.

Addendum II: Rep. Polis observes that “many of the Founding Fathers, including George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, grew hemp, and some of the first American flags were made of hemp.” He wonders, “Is Michele Leonhart embarrassed by Betsy Ross, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington?”​
 
oscar169

oscar169

Farming 🌱
Supporter
2,729
263
Oh my what a Fucking Tard, how did she get to the top.. SHE IS ON METH, look at her FACE !!!
 
Seamaiden

Seamaiden

Living dead girl
23,596
638
WHOA...!!!!! Is it me, or does that take some balls on her part? I mean, I know it's not the military, but she spoke out against her Commander in Chief and alla dat PUBLICLY! Isn't her position an appointed position?

What if this is the nation's first case of Suicide By President??

Ah, no, she was nominated by the guy she just stabbed in the back publicly, and confirmed by the senate. Unanimously, they did. Hmmm...
 
squiggly

squiggly

3,277
263
Leonhart has NEVER seen eye to eye with Obama. She has directly disobeyed him on multiple occasions. He made the mistake of not wanting to shake things up at the DEA, and in speaking with Leonhart believe that she would play ball with his policies. He was dead wrong about that.
 
altitudefarmer

altitudefarmer

3,271
263
That woman exemplifies much of what is wrong is the US today. It is so hard to understand why any educated person would CHOOSE to live in the dark, completely disregarding science to hold on to their precious brainwashing.

I guess that's why most churches are full of uneducated people.
 
squiggly

squiggly

3,277
263
That woman exemplifies much of what is wrong is the US today. It is so hard to understand why any educated person would CHOOSE to live in the dark, completely disregarding science to hold on to their precious brainwashing.

I guess that's why most churches are full of uneducated people.

Well part of what makes it tough for her, I imagine, is that she DOES have a front row seat to all of the negatives marijuana can bring. They exist, they are out there. It's just that as a law enforcement officer who doesn't use and likely doesn't associate with people who do--she is privy only to the negative side of the debate and not the positive one.

In her line of work it is COMMON to see people who are mixed up with marijuana who have also done awful, terrible, things. It's not strange for her to associate those things with the drug, but it's also not definitive. It's just an aspect of one person's perspective.

I think she's wrong, but I also think it's a lot easier to combat something if you understand it. It's her perspective that needs alteration here, not her intention.
 
altitudefarmer

altitudefarmer

3,271
263
I respectfully disagree, Squiggs. We have all seen the negative effects of cannabis first-hand. Lack of motivation, short-circuiting of memory function (short-term), lung irritation, and over-eating. Oh, and jail time, thanks to the Evil Empire.
That cunt has access to the same information concerning cannabis that everyone else does.
Her CHOICE to be ignorant is horrid.
 
squiggly

squiggly

3,277
263
I respectfully disagree, Squiggs. We have all seen the negative effects of cannabis first-hand. Lack of motivation, short-circuiting of memory function (short-term), lung irritation, and over-eating. Oh, and jail time, thanks to the Evil Empire.
That cunt has access to the same information concerning cannabis that everyone else does.
Her CHOICE to be ignorant is horrid.

The point I'm making is that YOU don't have the perspective SHE does, not the other way 'round. In her line of work you really do get to come across some pretty bad people who have done pretty bad things. Her linking those types of things to cannabis may be misguided, but it's not as if she doesn't have some legitimate context on which to base it. Being unreasonable and short sighted never got anyone anything. She's a human with a brain and came to the decisions she did according to the experiences she's had, just like everyone else. If her ideas are skewed it likey has a lot to do with her INexperience on the other side of the fence, and that's what I'm getting at here.
 
Prime C

Prime C

Defender of Dank
Supporter
4,285
263
"She's a human with a brain and came to the decisions she did according to the experiences she's had, just like everyone else."

Oh bs! She's told what to do period. Like she dont have all the information? Cmon!! Dont defend the nazis squig.
 
oregonized

oregonized

153
43
She's a villain no doubt, but wasn't the 1st, certainly wont be the last. I am amazed at people's astonishment. But this is her job, she is paid to quote UN drug policy verbatim. Could it be her personal opinion? Doubtful. People keep coming back to these people looking for the glimmer of hope, that signals the rationale has changed. They have said the same thing [sans a 6 month period in 1969 because of Mr. Leary] since 37'.

Why is this even news, she is Barry McCaffery with a vagina.
 
Prime C

Prime C

Defender of Dank
Supporter
4,285
263
President, Attorney General, and Senate Leader Voice Support for Reform, While DEA Rebukes Leadership


January 28, 2014 | Mike Liszewski

michele%2Bleonhart%2Band%2Beric%2Bholder.jpg


In the past week and a half, three of the most prominent leaders in Washington, President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Attorney General Eric Holder, have all made announcements that signal now is the time to reform federal laws and policies that prevent the implementation of state medical cannabis laws. In an interview last week with The New Yorker, President Obama acknowledged that cannabis is no more dangerous than alcohol. On January 16th, Majority Leader Reid said to the Las Vegas Sun, “I think we need to take a real close look at this...I think that there’s some medical reasons for marijuana.” Then on Friday, AG Holder announced that a policy change would soon be unveiled to allow state-approved marijuana businesses to use banking services, currently a major hindrance to medical cannabis providers.

These announcements made over such a brief a period of time comprise some of the boldest statements to date from federal officials in Washington. President Obama's comparison to alcohol raise serious questions about whether or not cannabis should even remain in the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), let alone it's absurd placement in Schedule I. In fact, Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), sponsor of HR 689, recently requested that the Administration take steps to drop cannabis from the CSA altogether.

The banking announcement is also significant progress that will actually improve the ability of providers to concentrate on quality of service rather than being forced to deal with the dangerous task of managing a cash-only business. While dispensaries have been found to provide a modest increase in neighborhood safety, the cash-only component remains the top area that has made these businesses vulnerable to burglary and robbery. Additionally, allowing these businesses to utilize banks will make it easier for regulatory bodies to oversee the industry, just like any other type of business. While this progress is truly meaningful, it likely will be limited to just banking access and not address the 280e tax issue that prevents cannabis businesses from taking normal business deductions on their tax filings. Nor is this policy a binding change in law, meaning things could go back at any time. Moreover, the details are still not know, for example, will medical cannabis providers be able to get loans, or just utilize accounts to make deposits and withdrawals from? Those concerns notwithstanding, patients and providers have reason for optimism with this announcement.

Indeed, binding reform for all federal medical cannabis issues (other than delisting or rescheduling cannabis under the CSA, which can be initiated by the Attorney General) must come from Congressional action. That is why Majority Leader Reid's public support for the therapeutic use of cannabis could prove to be the real game changer. Senator Reid joins a growing list of Members of Congress who are becoming publicly supportive of medical cannabis. With top-ranking leaders in both the Administration and Congress speaking up, it would appear that now more than ever is the time for Congress to pass meaningful reform such as HR 689 or HR 1523.

Yet, with all of this apparent momentum, some in the administration are showing signs of resistance bordering on insubordination. It has been reported the DEA Administrator Michelle Leonhart has called the President's comments "irresponsible" and "a slap in the face to cops." If you recall, Leonhart is the DEA chief who could not say whether or not cannabis or heroin is the more dangerous drug, yet somehow she inexplicably remains in charge of enforcing the nation's drug laws. Another high-ranking DEA official, Chief of Operations James Capra, called the recreational laws of Washington and Colorado “reckless and irresponsible,” not out of any concern for how the laws might effect medical cannabis patients, but simply because they threaten the DEA's culture of enforcement and eradication. The inflammatory rhetoric of Leonhart and Capra matches the fervent crackdown of medical marijuana providers by US Attorneys in certain states, such as California,Montana, Washington, and Michigan.

Clearly there appears to be is a substantial disconnect between Administration leaders like President Obama and AG Holder, and those who execute the laws of the land, such as Leonhart, Capra, and the aforementioned US Attorneys. While many are calling for Obama to fire Leonhart, her replacement would still be charged with enforcing the laws on the books today. Therefore, in order to end the crackdown on state medical cannabis laws, there needs to be legislative action from Congress to address the conflict in a comprehensive manner. With Majority Leader Reid's new-found support and medical cannabis enjoying 85% support in national polls, this change is now actually possible, Congress simply needs to act.
 
squiggly

squiggly

3,277
263
"She's a human with a brain and came to the decisions she did according to the experiences she's had, just like everyone else."

Oh bs! She's told what to do period. Like she dont have all the information? Cmon!! Dont defend the nazis squig.

Most of the "nazis" were just regular people, the trick is in understanding what motivated them--and in many cases what allowed them to look past atrocities. We'd do well to ask similar questions about our "enemies" now rather than just hurling insults at them.

You can hate and moan all you want to. The result? Nothing. A lot of it.
 
Prime C

Prime C

Defender of Dank
Supporter
4,285
263
DEA Chief Needs to Cut the Propaganda or Step Down
Posted: 01/28/2014 12:59 pm

Follow
follow-arrow.png


Barack Obama , Medical Marijuana, Drug Enforcement Administration, Reefer Madness,Dea, Decriminalization, Marijuana, Marijuana, Marijuana, Michele Leonhart,Misinformation, Propaganda, War On Drugs, Politics News

n-MICHELE-LEONHART-large570.jpg


Last week, President Obama made his most positive statements on marijuana policy reform yet, admitting that the drug is no more dangerous than alcohol and saying it's "important for [legalization] to go forward" in Colorado and Washington. While some praised his remarks and others questioned why it took so long to admit what 87 percent of Americans already recognize, DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart made headlines with her critical and nonsensical response. This is just the most recent statement in a decades-long history of propaganda from the agency, and Leonhart should either stop peddling misinformation or step down.

Leonhart's biggest criticism, made in a speech at the Major Counties Sheriffs' Association's annual meeting, was that she "felt the administration didn't understand the science enough to make those statements." This would be a ridiculous charge from anyone, but is particularly laughable coming from the head of the DEA. Despite the agency's efforts to prevent scientific research on marijuana, there is a growing body of evidence that shows marijuana has a much lower potential than alcohol for overdose, addiction, violence, and many other harms.

Yet the DEA has always ignored facts that support reforming drug laws, even when they come from within the agency. In 1988, DEA Judge Young ruled that "the evidence ... clearly shows that marijuana has been accepted as capable of relieving the distress of great numbers of very ill people" and that it would be "unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious" for the DEA to continue fighting laws to allow its use. Rather than accept this, then-Administrator John Lawn overturned the ruling and doubled down on the agency's opposition to medical marijuana.

Leonhart has carried on Lawn's legacy with a similar unwillingness to acknowledge basic scientific facts about the drugs her agency imprisons people for. At a House Judiciary Committee hearing in June 2012, Rep. Jared Polis asked Leonhart whether crack, meth, or heroin are worse for someone's health than marijuana. Instead of replying that marijuana is clearly far safer than these three drugs, she refused to answer directly, simply saying "all illegal drugs are bad." Given this, it's no surprise she balked at Obama's admission that it's not only safer than heroin, but the highly popular -- and legal -- alcohol.

That wasn't her only embarrassment at the hearing. After she dodged Polis' questions about drugs' relative harms, Rep. Steve Cohen told Leonhart about a Navy Seal he knew who used medical marijuana to increase his appetite and deal with other side effects of cancer treatment. She replied that she thought that should be "between him and his doctor," completely contradicting her agency's obstinate official stance that marijuana has no medical benefits.

Despite her notoriety, Leonhart isn't the only DEA official lying at Congressional hearings. Earlier this month, DEA operations chief James Capra told members of the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control that marijuana legalization is "reckless and irresponsible," claiming "in every part of the world where this experiment has been tried, it has failed time and time again." This couldn't be farther from the truth, as what Colorado and Washington are doing is completely unprecedented. Since marijuana prohibition first spread across the world at the United States' urging, no jurisdiction has ever re-legalized it -- even famously marijuana-friendly Amsterdam only allows the sale of up to 5 grams of the drug, and cultivating any amount is still illegal.

The DEA needs to stop opposing common sense drug policy reforms like marijuana legalization and the decriminalization of other drugs, which would actually help the agency by letting it focus its limited resources on more serious problems. By moving marijuana distribution into the open, legalization will allow sellers to settle disputes in court rather than through violence, while testing and labeling will minimize health risks to users. The head of New Jersey's Senate Judiciary Committee had it right when he said, "the only people who should be against [marijuana legalization] are the drug dealers."

If Leonhart and the DEA finally cut the propaganda, maybe the nation will be able to make some serious inroads on drug abuse. Over 80 percent of Americans think the Drug War has failed, and similar numbers support basic reforms like allowing medical marijuana and ending jail time for marijuana possession. DEA Administrator Leonhart should cease her agency's Reefer Madness-era objections to these common sense measures. If she doesn't, President Obama should consider a change in the DEA's leadership -- something many advocates are already pushing for.
 
Delerium

Delerium

783
93
I thought the Government was supposed to protect us from enemies foreign and domestic. Someone needs to arrest these Domestic Enemies for walking all over MY Rights.
Oops I forgot, I need them to protect me from myself. I'm my own enemy I guess.
 
Delerium

Delerium

783
93
oscar, you have to watch this enhanced version of the state of the union in MI right now. Idiots
 
Top Bottom