There is a slight flaw in the argument that breeding with fems or hermeries corrupts the grene pool or some how degrades it.
Cannabis in the wild, produces hermies, and sence all cannabis has at one point or time come from the wild. They all have that charactoristic. Do they not?
So how is it comprising the gene pool? It's already there, it's been there, always has, and always will.
If anything removing any gentics, that produce this phenotype, will be destroying the gene pool, or rather only breeding with plants from a dioescious stand point some what limets your choices in parents.
What strains would be availeble, if all fems, and any plants that showed and or breed herm traits were destroyed.
I wouldn't have a fucking plant in my garden. Everything I have ever grown if you look close enough, throws a nanner late in flower.
All
Sours
Chems
Og's
Purples
Aliens
Skunks
So basically saying trash the hermies is like fuck everything every one hear grows. There not full blown reck your garden. But I guentee anything taken past day 65 is gonna throw a nanner. Maybe only 1 nanner but it's there, and that means it's a hermie.
I read some were that only 1 out of 10,000 plants is a full blown female that will not produce a single nanner under a sercomstance. Chemical or what ever. It's in one of the grow bibles. They did a test or some shit. I think it was sensi maybe.
So yea.
IMO![
Sorry, from a purely genetic standpoint , these conclusions are
problematic, and not the consensus for most involved in cannabis genetics. Sorry boom,respect your growing... these conclusions are based on faulty premises. Tipz