DoobieDuck
Premium Member
Supporter
- 425
- 243
Federal Judge Finds Warrentless Searches/Raids Unconstitutional
0
Thumbs Up
None...
Federal Judge Finds Warrentless Searches/Raids Unconstitutional
Patients have rights too? Who would have thought? Possibly we patients have rights to our medicine after all. Congrats to those in Lake County. I know some of those fine folks there and they work very hard trying to turn the tables for all of us. Attending meeting, setting up rallies, and, as always, they vote. Good work my friends…
I'm no law scalar but I think if this is a Federal judge and as mentioned unconstitutional it would have Country-wide implications..all states.
from:
Warrantless Medical Marijuana Raids Unconstitutional, Federal Judge Finds
Thursday, October 16, 2014
by David Downs
http://www.eastbayexpress.com/Legali...al-judge-finds
Pot may be federally illegal, but so is police activity that violates due process.
This week, a federal court sided with California medical marijuana patients who are suing Lake County officials for the possibly illegal removal of their cannabis plants. Federal judge Thelton Henderson issued an injunction against the county Tuesday, saying police have to stop ripping up gardens without due process.
That’s a major victory for medical cannabis advocates. They say California officials are policing medical marijuana activity illegally some eighteen years after California voters legalized the plant for medical purposes.
Lake County narrowly passed Measure N thus June, banning medical cannabis cultivation on parcels one acre or smaller, and limiting cultivation to six mature plants on larger parcels. Illegal gardeners are supposed to get a five-day warning.
Patients sued, saying they’ve been subject to warrantless searches and immediate plant rips. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit were raided over the past several weeks, and included 60-year-old patient Mona Allen who was growing 6 mature plants, 66-year-old patient Carl Ray Harris who was growing 9 plants, and 70-year-old patient Nina Faye Sikes who, together with her elderly husband, was growing 14 immature plants.
Lake County law enforcement broke through several gates, entering the property of qualified patients without consent, and seizing medical marijuana without a warrant,” attorney Joe Elford stated.
Judge Henderson ordered that, "Defendant County of Lake, its officers, agents, and employees ... are enjoined from enforcing Ordinance No. 2997 [Measure N] through warrantless searches or summary abatement actions without consent, unless doing so is necessary to prevent immediate physical harm to persons or property, the destruction of evidence for a criminal case, or the escape of a criminal suspect."
"While a state or local government has the authority to declare a certain activity to be an 'emergency' or a 'nuisance,' such declaration does not, by itself, justify a warrantless search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment," Henderson wrote.
"The Court is utterly unpersuaded by Defendants’ claim at oral argument that Lake County should not be required to get a warrant for these abatement actions because it has not fully developed the institutional process required to do so."
The Court also held that, "[d]enying the preliminary injunction would leave numerous medical marijuana patients in Lake County vulnerable to future warrantless seizures of their medicine, which could lead to significant pain and suffering," and that in this circumstance, "the protection of constitutional rights and the guarantee of access to state-recognized medicine tilts the scales in favor of Plaintiffs."
"This is a tremendous victory for the medical marijuana patients of Lake County, who no longer have to live in fear that police officers will raid their property without a warrant and unlawfully seize their medicine," stated Elford, a San Francisco-based lawyer who filed the civil lawsuit with attorney Jeremy Blank. "This ruling should send a clear message to law enforcement that they are not above the law."
Lake County residents will vote on Measure O November 4 to alter pot-growing rules to protect patient rights.
0
None...
Federal Judge Finds Warrentless Searches/Raids Unconstitutional
Patients have rights too? Who would have thought? Possibly we patients have rights to our medicine after all. Congrats to those in Lake County. I know some of those fine folks there and they work very hard trying to turn the tables for all of us. Attending meeting, setting up rallies, and, as always, they vote. Good work my friends…
I'm no law scalar but I think if this is a Federal judge and as mentioned unconstitutional it would have Country-wide implications..all states.
from:
Warrantless Medical Marijuana Raids Unconstitutional, Federal Judge Finds
Thursday, October 16, 2014
by David Downs
http://www.eastbayexpress.com/Legali...al-judge-finds
Pot may be federally illegal, but so is police activity that violates due process.
This week, a federal court sided with California medical marijuana patients who are suing Lake County officials for the possibly illegal removal of their cannabis plants. Federal judge Thelton Henderson issued an injunction against the county Tuesday, saying police have to stop ripping up gardens without due process.
That’s a major victory for medical cannabis advocates. They say California officials are policing medical marijuana activity illegally some eighteen years after California voters legalized the plant for medical purposes.
Lake County narrowly passed Measure N thus June, banning medical cannabis cultivation on parcels one acre or smaller, and limiting cultivation to six mature plants on larger parcels. Illegal gardeners are supposed to get a five-day warning.
Patients sued, saying they’ve been subject to warrantless searches and immediate plant rips. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit were raided over the past several weeks, and included 60-year-old patient Mona Allen who was growing 6 mature plants, 66-year-old patient Carl Ray Harris who was growing 9 plants, and 70-year-old patient Nina Faye Sikes who, together with her elderly husband, was growing 14 immature plants.
Lake County law enforcement broke through several gates, entering the property of qualified patients without consent, and seizing medical marijuana without a warrant,” attorney Joe Elford stated.
Judge Henderson ordered that, "Defendant County of Lake, its officers, agents, and employees ... are enjoined from enforcing Ordinance No. 2997 [Measure N] through warrantless searches or summary abatement actions without consent, unless doing so is necessary to prevent immediate physical harm to persons or property, the destruction of evidence for a criminal case, or the escape of a criminal suspect."
"While a state or local government has the authority to declare a certain activity to be an 'emergency' or a 'nuisance,' such declaration does not, by itself, justify a warrantless search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment," Henderson wrote.
"The Court is utterly unpersuaded by Defendants’ claim at oral argument that Lake County should not be required to get a warrant for these abatement actions because it has not fully developed the institutional process required to do so."
The Court also held that, "[d]enying the preliminary injunction would leave numerous medical marijuana patients in Lake County vulnerable to future warrantless seizures of their medicine, which could lead to significant pain and suffering," and that in this circumstance, "the protection of constitutional rights and the guarantee of access to state-recognized medicine tilts the scales in favor of Plaintiffs."
"This is a tremendous victory for the medical marijuana patients of Lake County, who no longer have to live in fear that police officers will raid their property without a warrant and unlawfully seize their medicine," stated Elford, a San Francisco-based lawyer who filed the civil lawsuit with attorney Jeremy Blank. "This ruling should send a clear message to law enforcement that they are not above the law."
Lake County residents will vote on Measure O November 4 to alter pot-growing rules to protect patient rights.
