Funkadelic
- Posts
- 808
- Reactions
- 674
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2013
- Points
- 93
Nice find, funk. I compared it to a similar test they did with large se hoods:
Looks like 3x3 is the go-to footprint with these cmh fixtures.
not downing your link but as a cter,wordpress is a top propaganda site imho.just a headsup for future reference.not alot of folks know that.
agreedShit, homie. Most everything is propaganda or advertising (which I suppose are roughly the same thing) these days. Trust nothing.
I'm hoping to find as many as possible. I respect your healthy skepticism and questioning of bias. Absolutely!that chart they have is worth saving
If I read it right, Philips developed them to emulate efficient natural lighting for auto showrooms. THATS why it aint stonertech. No stoners involved~!Apparently these lights have been around since '94 it's weird they weren't used for growing sooner.... Anyone know if lighting companies are working on a higher wattage single bulb like a 1k? It'd be sick to have one big cmh or any kind of grow light really that you could hang in the middle of a 10'x10' or bigger room up high covering the whole room. Anyone have any opinions/experience w the nanolux cmh fixtures? I can get them reasonably priced. :D
Wouldn't shipping be high? Plus I get a charge for foreign exchange.Also u guys in the states ordering large numbers I would probably look at the UK market for these the pound has never been as low as it is now and it's only guna get worse before it gets any better it's defo a buyers market if u have $ or even €
I ain't too sure how much shipping would be but I've noticed u guys seem to pay a premium for 230v gear anyway over here 230v is standard it's worth a little look intoWouldn't shipping be high? Plus I get a charge for foreign exchange.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?