I'm not a believer. Regardless of what some people believe their senses are telling them, it would be surprising to any biologist that flushing would have any effect. In the range of concentrations that can allow a healthy plant to exist, eg., the concentrations that good growers use and get vigorous plants with, there is no pathway out of the plant for nutrient chemicals. None. The pathways and mechanisms that transport nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium across the root boundary are very well understood, and they work one way, in. There is not a sufficient osmotic pressure inside the plant of these chemicals to make them go out through the root boundary at the concentrations that exist. There is no transport pathway down from the buds to the roots. The nutrients are not exhaled from the leaves. A study I quoted here earlier this year, peer reviewed, measured and found that flushing had -no- measurable effect on the concentrations of nutrients in the plant, which is unsurprising to anyone who has studied cell biology. None of what believers in flushing think is happening is physically possible, or in fact happening.
Think about it from an evolutionary standpoint. Why would any plant ever want or need, in a nutrient poor world, ever evolve a mechanism to get rid of nitrogen? There is no need or benefit.
So why do we think something is going to happen that the plant didn't evolve to do? I would no more expect it to grow ears.
I have many years of practical, consumer experience to back up this belief. But that's beside the point.