Just Like Jacks isn't 3-2-1, MasterBlend isn't 2-2-1

  • Thread starter plumsmooth
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
plumsmooth

plumsmooth

162
43
Name or Number? A/S/L

Seriously though, after assuming 3-2-1 was once again the simplified Hippie Lazy Math version to like make it easier to rememeber the ratios Mannnnnn... Someone here said actually that was the original Ratio -- I guess they kept the "name" becasue it sounds CoooooL.

When I Discovered the 3.79 2.52 .99 I scratched my Bald Head and thought that is not 3-2-1 so I set out to put it into Mathmatical Perspective...

3.79/3 2.52/X
2.52X3 = 7.56
7.56 ÷ 3.79 = 1.994722955145119

So I thought that is pretty darn close enough to 2 to say they (Jack's A and B) are still in the same ratio!

3.79/3 .99/X
.99 x 3 = 2.97
2.97 ÷ 3.79 = .78

Ooops sorry I guess it is not .64 it is 3-2-.78

Anyway some have suggested that Jacks Already has enough Magnesium without the '1' i.e. 3-2-0

I had a theory that the 1 is partly to make up for the possible least dissolving component of Jacks Hydro = Epsom Salt? I got some Master Blend and it premixes perfectly without the what look like Mag Sulfate Crystals settling on the bottom -- and they stay there...
 
Last edited:
Anthem

Anthem

4,178
263
plumsmooth said:
Name or Number? A/S/L

Seriously though, after assuming 3-2-1 was once again the simplified Hippie Lazy Math version to like make it easier to rememeber the ratios Mannnnnn... Someone here said actually that was the original Ratio -- I guess they kept the "name" becasue it sounds CoooooL.

When I Discovered the 3.79 2.52 .99 I scratched my Bald Head and thought that is not 3-2-1 so I set out to put it into Mathmatical Perspective...

3.79/3 2.52/X
2.52X3 = 7.56
7.56 ÷ 3.79 = 1.994722955145119

So I thought that is pretty darn close enough to 2 to say they (Jack's A and B) are still in the same ratio!

3.79/3 .99/X
.99 x 3 = 2.97
2.97 ÷ 3.79 = .78

Ooops sorry I guess it is not .64 it is 3-2-.78
Click to expand...
What country are you in and what is your language?
 
Anthem

Anthem

4,178
263
plumsmooth said:
Whom may I ask are you addressing here?
Click to expand...
You with your screwed up Formulas.
One last time. If you take the original formula of Jacks it is 3 grams of Jacks Base fertilizer. 2 grams of Calcium Nitrate and 1 grams Epson Salt per gallon of water.
The formula was later changed to 3.79 grams of Jacks Base fertilizer, 2.52 grams of Calcium Nitrate and .99 grams of Epson Salt.
Why are you trying to create some formula with false formulations.
 
plumsmooth

plumsmooth

162
43
I humbly suggest you may be losing it brother.

I am not creating anything other than converting it into 3-2-1 Format for the purpose of mental relaxation and perspective pertaining to the original 3-2-1. If you do not believe do the Math yourself. Actually, I just did the F#$%ing math. Now, read the Math, understand it, or go back to Kindergarden...

By the way I am just playing around all in good fun ha ha!!!
 
plumsmooth

plumsmooth

162
43
I stand corrected that might be more like 6Th grade level math or even Middle School (Junior High School ha ha)?
 
Anthem

Anthem

4,178
263
plumsmooth said:
Name or Number? A/S/L

Seriously though, after assuming 3-2-1 was once again the simplified Hippie Lazy Math version to like make it easier to rememeber the ratios Mannnnnn... Someone here said actually that was the original Ratio -- I guess they kept the "name" becasue it sounds CoooooL.

When I Discovered the 3.79 2.52 .99 I scratched my Bald Head and thought that is not 3-2-1 so I set out to put it into Mathmatical Perspective...

3.79/3 2.52/X
2.52X3 = 7.56
7.56 ÷ 3.79 = 1.994722955145119

So I thought that is pretty darn close enough to 2 to say they (Jack's A and B) are still in the same ratio!

3.79/3 .99/X
.99 x 3 = 2.97
2.97 ÷ 3.79 = .78

Ooops sorry I guess it is not .64 it is 3-2-.78

Anyway some have suggested that Jacks Already has enough Magnesium without the '1' i.e. 3-2-0

I had a theory that the 1 is partly to make up for the possible least dissolving component of Jacks Hydro = Epsom Salt? I got some Master Blend and it premixes perfectly without the what look like Mag Sulfate Crystals settling on the bottom -- and they stay there...
Click to expand...
your formulas are screwed up to no end.
3.79/3 is fine
2.52 x 3 is wrong. It should be the same as above but 2.52/2
and lastly .99/1

A little different than the base of Jacks at 3 2 1 but more like 3.9, 2.6, 1.3. Like I have already said they changed the formula.
 
plumsmooth

plumsmooth

162
43
Dude that was the Math to figure out the answer you my friend are bugging out
 
Anthem

Anthem

4,178
263
plumsmooth said:
3.79/2.52/.99 = 3/2/.78 I win you Lose...
Click to expand...
You might want to head back to school but better yet feed that to your plant. It will still work but mine with still out grow yours because I understand the formulas!!!!
 
plumsmooth

plumsmooth

162
43
Anthem said:
You might want to head back to school but better yet feed that to your plant. It will still work but mine with still out grow yours because I understand the formulas!!!!
Click to expand...
Aha so you are admitting I am correct in my Conversion.... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
 
Anthem

Anthem

4,178
263
plumsmooth said:
Aha so you are admitting I am correct in my Conversion.... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Click to expand...
no I am not. I just know how far off from the 3.79, 2.52, .99 you can drift and it will not cause lock out or def. You will lost some Terps with that but it will grow the plant. And why are you trying to do some conversion? THIS IS ALL GRAMS PER GALLON FORMULATIONS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top Bottom