R
RikkiTikkiTemb0
- Posts
- 3
- Reactions
- 1
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2023
- Points
- 3
So I have exhausted my contacts in regards to this question and the answers so far have felt uninformed and certainly not scientific/empirical in the slightest
Firstly, Does CMH really have a better PAR and/or PPFD than LED, is it the other way around, or is there no difference and it only lies in the quality/design of the product (which Diode and processor for LED and Which Ballast has which Bulb for CMH)?
As far as I've seen CMH ALWAYS has a higher PAR in every regard PLUS an extended UV and IR spectrum (UV very important for trichome development I've heard and read) but is the difference really consequential or measurable? Moreover, I have heard that the extra UV just isn't needed and that even if you supplement with far blues you're just increasing your chance of burning the plant... is this true? Ive read in a study (published by Frontiers) the opposite of this and the more light and UV present (PPFD) has a linear correlation to an increase in the presence of terpenes and actual volume of flower. The study in question claimed that the highest this correlation goes is a PPFD of 1,800 umol which sounds very high to me given everything else I've read which says 1,000-1,200 umol for bulk flower is standard.
This brings me to my second concern/point of contention; I have been told that the Wattage claimed by LEDs is different from that which is claimed by CMH. How can this be the case? Is there some weird sales trick which instead of calculating the Watts consumed over, say, 3hrs for LEDs the CMHs are calculated at the Watts consumed in 1hr? The SunSystem LEC/CMH boasts a 315W consumption which would be standard unit W/h... right? Is this different from an LED which is labeled at 315W (aka 315W/hr), is the time the Watt consumption is measured different?
Now assuming that there is no weird salesmen trickery, and the Wattage labeled is measured at the same unit/rate, surely this doesn't effect the cost outside of having to buy bulbs right? I know that question may seem obvious but again I'm hearing a lot of conflicting ideas and there's, unfortunately, no place that I know of that has this comprehensive of a comparison that isn't from a store/blog/interested party trying to push a product. I need hard evidence as best as possible (well informed anecdotes are welcome, but none of this "some people say" bc I want to know who specifically is saying this and whether they have credible ethos)
I know this is a long and involved post, but I would research this myself if I was able to find more concrete evidence. Thank you and I await your detailed response.
Study mentioned; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.646020/full
Firstly, Does CMH really have a better PAR and/or PPFD than LED, is it the other way around, or is there no difference and it only lies in the quality/design of the product (which Diode and processor for LED and Which Ballast has which Bulb for CMH)?
As far as I've seen CMH ALWAYS has a higher PAR in every regard PLUS an extended UV and IR spectrum (UV very important for trichome development I've heard and read) but is the difference really consequential or measurable? Moreover, I have heard that the extra UV just isn't needed and that even if you supplement with far blues you're just increasing your chance of burning the plant... is this true? Ive read in a study (published by Frontiers) the opposite of this and the more light and UV present (PPFD) has a linear correlation to an increase in the presence of terpenes and actual volume of flower. The study in question claimed that the highest this correlation goes is a PPFD of 1,800 umol which sounds very high to me given everything else I've read which says 1,000-1,200 umol for bulk flower is standard.
This brings me to my second concern/point of contention; I have been told that the Wattage claimed by LEDs is different from that which is claimed by CMH. How can this be the case? Is there some weird sales trick which instead of calculating the Watts consumed over, say, 3hrs for LEDs the CMHs are calculated at the Watts consumed in 1hr? The SunSystem LEC/CMH boasts a 315W consumption which would be standard unit W/h... right? Is this different from an LED which is labeled at 315W (aka 315W/hr), is the time the Watt consumption is measured different?
Now assuming that there is no weird salesmen trickery, and the Wattage labeled is measured at the same unit/rate, surely this doesn't effect the cost outside of having to buy bulbs right? I know that question may seem obvious but again I'm hearing a lot of conflicting ideas and there's, unfortunately, no place that I know of that has this comprehensive of a comparison that isn't from a store/blog/interested party trying to push a product. I need hard evidence as best as possible (well informed anecdotes are welcome, but none of this "some people say" bc I want to know who specifically is saying this and whether they have credible ethos)
I know this is a long and involved post, but I would research this myself if I was able to find more concrete evidence. Thank you and I await your detailed response.
Study mentioned; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.646020/full