Ah, you might want to check out the thread we recently had that demonstrated pretty clearly that a longer vegging period is giving the guy whose name I've suddenly forgotten a
much higher yield.
Nutts, that's the cat! Here's his thread, photo-rich.
https://www.thcfarmer.com/community/threads/how-much-veg-time-and-its-effect-on-yeild.56070/
That proved nothing as far as yield to veg time ratio PER YEAR. Of course you get a higher yield (not 100% connoisseur ) from each plant when you veg longer but smaller plants have a higher ratio of "connoisseur/marketable buds"
He's comparing no veg time to 30 day veg not 30 days to 100 or more !
I don't know why you don't understand this already as much as i see your posts, although it just seems like you like to be objective to whatever someone says so you can argue or debate. But take note you have to subtract the extra costs of certain techniques from the increases you have in yield &
How many harvests less will you have over the next 5 years if you double the veg time.
More less often or Less more often ?
Nutts even types later in a reply " Do you do a shitload of supercropping to keep em low? A two month veg is insane." So he just supports what i was saying before.
You will get double the yield from veg for 30 days instead of 15, you will not double your yield if you veg for 60 days instead of 30 we are talking about INDOOR.
Veg time / yield is not based on a exponential or logarithmic type curve, the equation creates a parabola on a graph.
If you want to take the time & start a poll to get some veg/yield figures from users, I will collect the data & graph it out. we would need to know; # lights ,watts, medium, co2, # plants, veg length, flower length, strain. I think that would fill in enough variables to get some accurate figures.
I love science cuz it doesn't argue with me as much as everyone else, lol.
