Why do you say that? Is it because 1284 doesnt specifically define patient to patient sales? Neither did amendment 20, so do you believe its always been illegal or something changed because 1284?
You are correct that HB10-1284 does not specifically address patient to patient sales. However this is the part that has been interpreted to define [eliminate] patient to patient sales:
(2) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FURTHER DECLARES THAT IT IS
UNLAWFUL UNDER STATE LAW TO CULTIVATE, MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTE,
OR SELL MEDICAL MARIJUANA, EXCEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS,
CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS IN SECTION 14 OF ARTICLE
XVIII OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION AND THIS ARTICLE OR WHEN ACTING AS
A PRIMARY CAREGIVER IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS, CONDITIONS,
LIMITATIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS OF SECTION 25-1.5-106, C.R.S.
Since only sales by Caregivers, Infused Product Manufacturers , and MMCs is covered in the law, then patient to patient is not.
However, there is some dispute in that Amendment 20 authorizes sale in general:
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, no person, including a patient or primary care-giver, shall be entitled to the protection of this section for his or her acquisition, possession, manufacture, production, use, sale, distribution, dispensing, or transportation of marijuana for any use other than medical use.
So to quote the most used terms of high paid Medical Marijuana lawyers, "It's a gray area."