I find the cross on the Obamanator hilarious, even as a liberal--lol.
That said, I'm already wary on the first line where it is refered to as "land race" when the term is "landrace".
I'll explain why:
Identification of a landrace strain takes a keen eye. Landraces possess common morphology--and this is what separates them from other sub-groups within the species.
The act of actually finding a landrace, identifying it morphologically, and selecting suitable parent stock is complex enough that one might expect to see it called by the proper term.
It could, however, be a typo.
I'm wary mostly because the midwest is very far behind the west/southwest in terms of keeping genetics straight. Even the west/southwest is pretty bad at keeping things cataloged well.
I'm from very near to Michigan (near enough that I'd visit the beach there maybe 7-8 times a summer--down near Indiana though). So I know that regionally speaking we've still got considerable work to do when it comes to our strain cataloging and other such things.
This could be totally innocent but for me at that price this would be a red flag.
