Not LITERALLY, or else he would certainly be claiming prima nocte at all the gay weddings. :cigar:
But Obamacare, how do you explain that? Mofo flipped healthcare upside down and named it after himself. That is a far reaching legislation which personally effects every single American. O has powers that reach into the daily lives of every America, and he can order his minions to push a button to unleash hellfire missiles from a drone at anyone worldwide, American citizen or not. Ancient Kings never had anything close to such power.
Let's get a few things clear bro:
1. The idea that the ACA flipped the healthcare industry upside down is nothing but a media narrative. It flipped the insurance industry upside down, and that's something that was needed. Even if the law ends up being a terrible mistake, it will be good for the fact that it put these restrictions on insurance providers. There is no chance they will be rolled back now that people enjoy them, and that's a success.
2. He didn't name that shit after himself, as a matter of fact he didn't even author the bill. It's called the Affordable Care Act. It was his opponents who painted it Obamacare (AND sold the narrative that it "turns everything upside down") in an attempt to tie him the "failed policy" before the 2012 election. They went all in on that narrative and now they can't drop it. Let's not be silly and pretend something different is going on.
3. He didn't do this in the manner a king would do it. In fact, he didn't do it alone at all. His function was to give the final seal of approval to the bill (that's what a president does), and in some capacity to broker the deals that allowed the necessary votes to be won in congress. In other words, he used our system of legislation to pass the bill. He didn't just mandate out of nowhere that this is how shit is now.
4. As for the drone strikes, I'm in the same boat with you in terms of opposing that--but it is a congressionally given and wielded power that he enjoys. What congress giveth, congress may taketh away. Again, not very akin to a king in any sense of the term.
5. I think you're severely misrepresenting the power of kings throughout history. It may be that in the past they didn't have drone strikes--but they also didn't have the media and a relatively educated public to worry about. Genocide and murder was much more common in those times than it is today, I think any sane person would have a hard time making any kind of sensible comparison to the death toll American actions post Vietnam have taken to those pre-Vietnam (and those of other nations throughout history). Along the arc of history the world as a whole has become much less murderous and much more civilized.